Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but I know nothing about Zookeeper. I gave the documentation a cursory glance but I didn't see anything that looked like configuration manipulation. But if a znode is similar to a file or folder than it would seem that if

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ted Dunning
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Actually, just implementing > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-37 would be even easier. It would be easier, but it would lose the notifications. > But from what I am guessing you want to have Zookeeper itself be treated as >

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-06-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [all] Source jars for released components

2009-06-12 Thread Phil Steitz
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: POOL-141 is asking for source jars for old versions of [pool] to be pushed to maven central. I think we talked about this before in relation to another component, but I can't find the thread and can't recall the resol

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ralph Goers
Actually, just implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-37 would be even easier. But from what I am guessing you want to have Zookeeper itself be treated as a single Configuration. To do that you would probably need to extend HierarchicalConfiguration. You can't really e

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ralph Goers
Pardon my ignorance, but I know nothing about Zookeeper. I gave the documentation a cursory glance but I didn't see anything that looked like configuration manipulation. But if a znode is similar to a file or folder than it would seem that if it can be implemented as a provider in Commons V

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ted Dunning
On a related topic, I am interested in building a configuration object that pulls configuration from Zookeeper and can optionally persist back to ZK. A key feature would be auto-reload on change combined with a lazily copied snapshot so that related properties could be read from a guaranteed stabl

[Commons Wiki] Update of "ValidatorStandalone" by GaborKoves

2009-06-12 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by GaborKoves: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/ValidatorStandalone -- T

[EMAIL] fixes for 1.2

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
I think the file src/assembly/src.xml needs updating now that some files / dirs have been removed. Also, how about using file: URLs for the tests, rather than http: ones? What do you think about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-87 ? Is that a reasonable approach for comparing URLs? S/

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 12/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I remembered on my way home that I had the same issue when running the > test without network connectivity a few weeks ago I just tried with the network disconnected, and the 3 failures disappeared. However, a different one appear

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Sebastian, I remembered on my way home that I had the same issue when running the test without network connectivity a few weeks ago Sorry for the wasted cycles Siegfried Goeschl sebb wrote: > On 12/06/2009, sebb wrote: > >> On 12/06/2009, sebb wrote: >> > On 12/06/2009, Siegfried

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 12/06/2009, sebb wrote: > On 12/06/2009, sebb wrote: > > On 12/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > > > see my comments inlined ... > > > > > > For the rest of us : > > > > > > +) the missing AL headers in pom.xml are an M2 issue I had before > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 12/06/2009, sebb wrote: > On 12/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > see my comments inlined ... > > > > For the rest of us : > > > > +) the missing AL headers in pom.xml are an M2 issue I had before > > +) the broken tests needs investigation since they work

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 12/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > see my comments inlined ... > > For the rest of us : > > +) the missing AL headers in pom.xml are an M2 issue I had before > +) the broken tests needs investigation since they work on my box and Gump > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goesch

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 12, 2009, at 1:32 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: I may have some time to work on the experimental branch this summer. There is a fundamental point I'd like to address, that's the persistence of the configurations. As described in CONFIGURATION-311 I'd like to add two methods to the Con

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Sebastian, see my comments inlined ... For the rest of us : +) the missing AL headers in pom.xml are an M2 issue I had before +) the broken tests needs investigation since they work on my box and Gump Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl sebb wrote: > On 11/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >>

Re: Request for Comment: Corey Scott as Commons Committer?

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 12/06/2009, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : > > > > not sure what to do here - Corey Scott is involved with commons-email > > for ages and sent in a lot of patches over the years. IMHO that would > > qualify him as committer but he has no other Apache Commons involvement >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.2 based on RC1

2009-06-12 Thread sebb
On 11/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-email-1.2 . :-) > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_2 I tested against: Last Changed Rev: 783930 AL headers are missing from commons-email

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-06-12 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-06-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-06-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: Request for Comment: Corey Scott as Commons Committer?

2009-06-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : not sure what to do here - Corey Scott is involved with commons-email for ages and sent in a lot of patches over the years. IMHO that would qualify him as committer but he has no other Apache Commons involvement as far as I know. So the question is "does a long stan

Re: archive.apache.org/dist vs www.apache.org/dist

2009-06-12 Thread Mark Thomas
Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Mark Thomas a écrit : > >> www... is the location for the latest releases. It should contain the >> latest release and the latest stable release (these may be the same >> release) for each release branch. Older releases should be cleaned out >> with each new release. > > T

[configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

2009-06-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
I may have some time to work on the experimental branch this summer. There is a fundamental point I'd like to address, that's the persistence of the configurations. As described in CONFIGURATION-311 I'd like to add two methods to the Configuration interface, sync() and flush(), similar to the

Re: archive.apache.org/dist vs www.apache.org/dist

2009-06-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Mark Thomas a écrit : www... is the location for the latest releases. It should contain the latest release and the latest stable release (these may be the same release) for each release branch. Older releases should be cleaned out with each new release. The older files are removed automaticall