[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Configuration -

2009-04-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=180059&projectId=161 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 23:31:10 -0700 Finished at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 23:32:32 -0700 Total time: 1m 22s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Compress -

2009-04-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=179704&projectId=176 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 15:30:44 -0700 Finished at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 15:31:06 -0700 Total time: 21s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Num

Re: [site] How is the Commons site built/deployed?

2009-04-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up the JCR Commons subproject in Apache Jackrabbit, and > I'd like to follow the example of Apache Commons in setting up the web > site. However, I couldn't find where the sources of the Commons site > are located (I can f

[site] How is the Commons site built/deployed?

2009-04-01 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, I'm setting up the JCR Commons subproject in Apache Jackrabbit, and I'd like to follow the example of Apache Commons in setting up the web site. However, I couldn't find where the sources of the Commons site are located (I can find the site sources of individual components, but what binds them

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Compress -

2009-04-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=179339&projectId=176 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 06:32:38 -0700 Finished at: Wed 1 Apr 2009 06:33:12 -0700 Total time: 33s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

[all] JIRA Dashboard

2009-04-01 Thread Henri Yandell
I've started a Commons dashboard: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12312273 You should be able to add that to your dashboards if you want. Currently it gives a drop down that only has Commons projects in, shows the latest Commons releases, the most voted for Commo

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-01 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread Oliver Heger
sebb wrote: > On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the >> > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page >> > says that Maven 1.x is the pr

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread sebb
On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the > > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page > > says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build too

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread James Ring
Hey, On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> wrote: >> > >> > Do we really need to support Ant, Maven 1.x and Maven 2? > > If the project supports Java 1.3, then IMO it should have a way of > building and testing on Java 1.3, in which case it needs something > else other than Maven 2