Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-03-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Stefan Bodewig wrote at Montag, 30. März 2009 12:27: > I think I see why Gump's mvn repository proxy doesn't work here - it > currently doesn't work for group-ids that contain dots. > > Do you want me to turn off nags until this gets fixed (shouldn't take > longer than a few days, I hope)? I don

[Commons-JCI]

2009-03-30 Thread Liam Coughlin
Is this project dormant? Nothing much seems to have happened with it for a minute

Re: [Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > > > > What about the corresponding getNextxxxEntry() methods? > > > I suppose they do avoid a cast. > > > Yes, in one case (tar IIRC) they have been explicitly asked for via > JIRA. > Could not find the JIRA issue. The commit

Re: svn commit: r760000 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ar/ArArchiveOutputStream.java test/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ArTestC

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > > > Might it not be better to throw an Exception if methods are called out > > of sequence? > > > We are pretty inconsistent here. In general I agree it would be > better to throw an exception, but we seem to swallow other er

Re: svn commit: r760000 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ar/ArArchiveOutputStream.java test/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ArTestC

2009-03-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > Might it not be better to throw an Exception if methods are called out > of sequence? We are pretty inconsistent here. In general I agree it would be better to throw an exception, but we seem to swallow other errors in other classes. Stefan ---

Re: [Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > What about the corresponding getNextxxxEntry() methods? > I suppose they do avoid a cast. Yes, in one case (tar IIRC) they have been explicitly asked for via JIRA. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> OK, I'll remove them. > > What about the corresponding getNextxxxEntry() methods? > I suppose they do avoid a cast. Correct. I'll don't need them so specific stuff. For ChangeSet its all enough to have ArchiveEntry aswell. - T

Re: [Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > > > The abstract parent class for archive output streams has the method > > > putArchiveEntry(ArchiveEntry) > > > but all the implementations - apart from Ar - also define the specific > method > > > putNextEntry(xxxArchiveE

Re: svn commit: r760000 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ar/ArArchiveOutputStream.java test/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/ArTestC

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, bode...@apache.org wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Mon Mar 30 15:07:54 2009 > New Revision: 76 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=76&view=rev > Log: > make closeArchiveEntry a NOP if called repeatedly. This makes ArTestCase > fail for all platforms consistentl

Re: [Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote: > The abstract parent class for archive output streams has the method > putArchiveEntry(ArchiveEntry) > but all the implementations - apart from Ar - also define the specific method > putNextEntry(xxxArchiveEntry) where xxx = Zip, Jar, etc. > Do we really need the l

[Compress] Do output streams really need the putNextEntry() method?

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
The abstract parent class for archive output streams has the method putArchiveEntry(ArchiveEntry) but all the implementations - apart from Ar - also define the specific method putNextEntry(xxxArchiveEntry) where xxx = Zip, Jar, etc. Do we really need the latter method? Would it not just be simp

[NET] support for IPv6 FTP - GsoC?

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
Net does not specifically support IPv6, though as it uses Java, basic IPv6 support is built-in. One area which is not yet covered is the new FTP commands for IPv6, e.g. EPASV etc as per RFC 2428 - FTP Extensions for IPv6 and NATs, e.g. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2428.html Are there any plans to

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-03-30 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: svn commit: r759472 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/examples.xml xdoc/index.xml xdoc/zip.xml

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-03-28, sebb wrote: > > > On 28/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On 2009-03-28, sebb wrote: > > > >>> I thought the idea was that the ArchiveInputStreams would not allow > >>> one to read past the end of the entry, so one can just read until >

Re: [COMPRESS] Changeset ideas

2009-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > > > The current ChangeSet API allows for: > > + deletion of entries by name > > + addition of entries by ArchiveEntry and InputStream. > > > > This is fine as far as it goes, but I think it would be useful to add: > > + addition of entries

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-03-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
I think I see why Gump's mvn repository proxy doesn't work here - it currently doesn't work for group-ids that contain dots. Do you want me to turn off nags until this gets fixed (shouldn't take longer than a few days, I hope)? Stefan -

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-03-30 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th