>> We could also add some new methods with partial implementations, for example
>> putArchiveEntry(File)
>> extractFile(File basedir, Entry)
>
> If this is a common usecase, yes. The only real user of a simial API
> I know is Ant and here those methods wouldn't help since they don't
> provide a wa
Hi,
> The current ChangeSet API allows for:
> + deletion of entries by name
> + addition of entries by ArchiveEntry and InputStream.
>
> This is fine as far as it goes, but I think it would be useful to add:
> + addition of entries by File
> + replacement of an existing named entry by File or Entr
On 2009-03-29, sebb wrote:
> The existing ArchiveInputStream and ArchiveOutputStream abstract
> classes are quite minimal. Seems to me that there is quite a lot of
> common code that they could provide.
> For example, if the Stream was stored as a protected variable, then
> they could provide ge
your API suggesteions sound useful.
On 2009-03-30, sebb wrote:
> On 29/03/2009, sebb wrote:
>> On 29/03/2009, sebb wrote:
>>> The current ChangeSet API allows for:
deletion of entries by name
> The same method call is currently used for both deleting a single
> file, and for deleting a d
On 2009-03-28, sebb wrote:
> On 28/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2009-03-28, sebb wrote:
>>> I thought the idea was that the ArchiveInputStreams would not allow
>>> one to read past the end of the entry, so one can just read until
>>> read() returns -1?
>> I don't think AR is the only
On 29/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 29/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> > The current ChangeSet API allows for:
> > + deletion of entries by name
The same method call is currently used for both deleting a single
file, and for deleting a directory tree. If the string matches a file,
it is deleted, but if it
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system properties
> > > that get set in addition to the url and additional
On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:08 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system
properties
that get set in addition to the url and additional dependencies are
added.
For example, jackrabbit is required for the WebDAV test to run
On 29/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> The current ChangeSet API allows for:
> + deletion of entries by name
> + addition of entries by ArchiveEntry and InputStream.
Forgot about "Move", which is not yet implemented.
I think that should be called "Rename", unless it really means to move
the entry elsewh
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:03 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Can one also run the tests by adding
> >
> >
> -Dtest.webdav.uri=webdav://admin:ad...@192.168.10.133:7402/vfstest/test-data
> >
> > etc. to the command-line? That's perhaps simpler for one-off
On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:03 AM, sebb wrote:
Can one also run the tests by adding
-Dtest.webdav.uri=webdav://admin:ad...@192.168.10.133:7402/vfstest/
test-data
etc. to the command-line? That's perhaps simpler for one-off tests.
No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
The existing ArchiveInputStream and ArchiveOutputStream abstract
classes are quite minimal. Seems to me that there is quite a lot of
common code that they could provide.
For example, if the Stream was stored as a protected variable, then
they could provide generic implementations for many of the s
The current ChangeSet API allows for:
+ deletion of entries by name
+ addition of entries by ArchiveEntry and InputStream.
This is fine as far as it goes, but I think it would be useful to add:
+ addition of entries by File
+ replacement of an existing named entry by File or Entry+InputStream
It
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I need to document this. When you run all the tests
> TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a functional
> test - it requires a WebDAV server to be available. To run the test you need
> to add something like
>
>
> webdav
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
16 matches
Mail list logo
