+0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
-Rahul
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
On 2009-03-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&pathrev=753102
> The compress component shall become a proper Commons component:
> [X] +1 Yes
> [ ] -1 No
Stefan
+0 (meaning I'm in favour, but as I don't plan to be involved in the
short term then I won't vote +1; this being one of the few votes where
I think a +1 = "Yes and I'm going to volunteer time").
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOS
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> One more try :)
>>
>> Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done
>> post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites).
> Another problem of the site:
>
> Project Documentation/Project
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&pathrev=753102
RAT only flags a few
+1, all tests pass now also on IBM JDK 6.
Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> My second attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-)
>
> RC2 includes sebb's patches that make numerous instance variables
> immutable.
>
> NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested Db
Henri Yandell wrote:
> One more try :)
>
> Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done
> post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites).
Actually I could not let go this failing test with IBM JDK running on Maven
without any reason. And finally I found out the p
On 2009-03-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
> since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected
> several todos.
I'm a bit swamped at ${work} right now, but hope to prepare a PROPOSAL
and start a formal vote tomorrow at latest.
> * Gump: I don't see compress here:
> http
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
Hi
> All committers have write access to Gump data files.
> I can add it.
> It can go into Compress JIRA issue if you want to track it, but AFAIK
> Gump is not required.
not necessary if you keep an eye on it :-)
>> * ChangeSet Support (SANDBOX-183): testcases and such are running. Its
>>
On 12/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected several
> todos.
> I would like to discuss what is necessary for release 1 and what is not.
>
> * Of course administrative stuff: vote compress to proper etc. I don't
> hav
11 matches
Mail list logo
