Re: [compress] ArArchiver Implementation strange behaviour

2009-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-28, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Torsten (or any other) if you can't check this out now I will create > an issue for that and check it out later. Let me know. I'd say create an issue and if possible attach a test. Stefan --

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-28, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Additionally we have to: > - improve maven site stuff, which is a bit outdated now Oh yes, true. I must admit that I'm at a total loss here since I never used any mvn goal other than clean or package - so I'll have some learning to do 8-) > - check A

[LANG] IDKey class

2009-03-01 Thread Henri Yandell
Any reason that IDKey is public? Rather than putting in the builder package and making it package-private? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.

Re: [compress] State of encoding support in ZIP package

2009-03-01 Thread Wolfgang Glas
Stefan Bodewig schrieb: > On 2009-02-27, Wolfgang Glas wrote: > >> Additionally, my experience with WinZip shows, that WinZip writes weird >> filenames to the single-byte version of the filename when a unicode field is >> present. > > Hmm, native encoding I'd guess. Sth like this, looks like th

[compress] [PATCH] Refactoring of zip encoding support.

2009-03-01 Thread Wolfgang Glas
Hello all, Well, the latest discussions with Stefan showed two shortcoming of our current ZIP unicode support: 1) Unicode extra fields are written for all ZIP entries and not only for entries, which are not encodable by the encoding set to ZipArchiveOutputStream. 2) In order to implement selec

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-03-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> In parallel to "graduation" we may be able to finish the stuff we want >>> to see done before the 1.0 release. >> I'd like to see some statements in the Javadoc about the intended >> thread safety or otherwise of the classes. > >> However, if there are any classes

Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels

2009-03-01 Thread Matt Benson
Hen, --- On Sun, 3/1/09, Henri Yandell wrote: > From: Henri Yandell > Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels > To: "Commons Developers List" > Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 1:20 PM > No reason not to give it a try and if > it's too large it can move out of Commons. > Thanks for th

Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels

2009-03-01 Thread Matt Benson
Mark: see comments inline. --- On Sun, 3/1/09, Mark Fortner wrote: > From: Mark Fortner > Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels > To: "Commons Developers List" > Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 1:23 PM > Hi Matt, > I like the idea; however, it might make more sense to > simply hav

Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels

2009-03-01 Thread Mark Fortner
Hi Matt, I like the idea; however, it might make more sense to simply have domain objects (and in the case of dbutils perhaps a small derby database) in each project as necessary. This can be used to both improve the unit tests and provide working examples of the code. Mark On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at

Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels

2009-03-01 Thread Henri Yandell
No reason not to give it a try and if it's too large it can move out of Commons. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-449 might be of interest to it. Hen On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > For awhile I've had an itch that it would be nice to have a project whose > purp

gauging sandbox interest - openmodels

2009-03-01 Thread Matt Benson
For awhile I've had an itch that it would be nice to have a project whose purpose is to provide small, realistic domain models for consumption primarily by tests of library-type code (if the domain models are actually usable/extensible for real work, so much the better). It seems to me that p

Re: Commons committer: Dan Fabulich

2009-03-01 Thread Paul Benedict
Congratulations!!! On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Welcoming Dan as a new committer to Commons. > > Dan Fabulich became a sandbox committer a little while back and put in > the work to make DbUtils release ready. > > We're hoping Dan will be energized to do the release man