I had some questions about a few remaining bugs... maybe somebody here can
help...
1) OptimalBeanListHandler
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-37
This bug provides a patch that considerably improves the performance of
BeanListHandler.
However, Julien correctly points out that:
W
If I rollback the change from CLI-162, and comment out the
testInfiniteLoop; your new test also infinite loops. So CLI-162 is a
sign that something has broken in that class since 1.1, rather than it
being an existing issue in 1.1.
Rolling back each commit on HelpFormatter, the issue appears to hav
OK, I've checked in a fix for the null problem (and the five bugs
surrounding it) in revision 742865. Code review here is welcome.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=742865
The code passes against Derby, but, as I mentioned earlier, I don't have
an Oracle test instance to run ag
Thanks for the update.
It's invoked when I run mvn package:
Running org.apache.commons.cli.bug.BugCLI162Test
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013
sec <<< FAILURE!
Hen
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hen:
>
> Ok, I've updated the class BugC
Hen:
Ok, I've updated the class BugCLI162Test in SVN with a failing test. Note that
BugCLI162Test is not invoked during a Maven build. Is this an omission? How
about an AllTests class for the "bug" package?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoft
I'll extract a unit test from our code and post a new ticket.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:10 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)
I think it's a showstopper - that was a fix
I think it's a showstopper - that was a fix due to infinite looping
causing an OOM. Sounds like you have a test case that isn't covered by
the current tests.
Hen
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hello Hen:
>
> I've encountered a backwards compatibility issue in our applicati
If Gary's issue isn't deemed a showstopper, this is my +1
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hello Hen:
>
> I've encountered a backwards compatibility issue in our application unit test
> suite related to [CLI-162].
>
> With version 1.1, I can print call HelpFormatter#printHel
On 09/02/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Liam Coughlin wrote:
>
>
> > b) Yes it will have a thread safety issue -- you'll need to synchronize on
> > something when setting the pmdKnownBroken variable.
> >
>
> When setting? Or when reading? Remember, once pmdKnownBroken is true, it
> will never agai
Liam Coughlin wrote:
b) Yes it will have a thread safety issue -- you'll need to synchronize on
something when setting the pmdKnownBroken variable.
When setting? Or when reading? Remember, once pmdKnownBroken is true, it
will never again be false, so there's no risk that one thread will try
Hello Hen:
I've encountered a backwards compatibility issue in our application unit test
suite related to [CLI-162].
With version 1.1, I can print call HelpFormatter#printHelp(String,Options)
without any problems without our options. When I replace 1.1 with 1.2 I get:
Exception in thread "main
+1
Oliver
Note: The link to the binaries is wrong. Replace RC1 by RC2.
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Apologies for the revote. I've added a note to the release page to
check the NOTICE file's copyright year.
There should be no difference between the two other than the RC1->RC2
in the pom and the upd
snip
>
>int sqlType = Types.VARCHAR;
>if (!pmdKnownBroken) {
>try {
>sqlType = stmt.getParameterMetaData().getParameterType(i+1);
>} catch (Exception e) { pmdKnownBroken = true; }
>}
>stmt.setNull(i + 1, sqlType);
>
> Possibly we'd add a new argument to
This email is long, so here's the executive summary:
Summary: The Oracle JDBC driver is broken in ways that will require some
Oracle-specific workarounds. I think I have a good workaround in mind,
but I don't actually have an Oracle instance available to test. Can
somebody tell me if I'm do
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote:
I submitted a small documentation fix for the pipeline_basics tutorial.
...
This is issue SANDBOX-278
Applied patch and republished site.
-Rahul
Thank you. Now people can cut and paste from the w
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Niall Pemberton
>> I think the new Java5 stuff in trunk should be released as IO 2.0 - so
>> we could release a IO 1.5 version that is for JDK 1.4. Having said
>> that JDK 1.4 is so old now I don't really t
Ok, sort of letting eclipse take over. More comments inline.
"Phil Steitz" wrote in message
news:49901038.2070...@gmail.com...
> billbar...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Do we need this?
>> +if (mask != other.mask)
>> +return false;
>> .
as the code stands now, unnecessary. The va
billbar...@apache.org wrote:
Do we need this?
+if (mask != other.mask)
+return false;
...
Or this?
+if (!Arrays.equals(states, other.states)){
It would seem reasonable to me that two OpenIntToDoubleHashMaps would be
equal iff they contain they contain the s
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Welcoming Paul as a new committer to Commons. Realizing that we don't
> announce this very publicly usually.
>
> Mark Thomas became a committer at the start of January and Ralph Goers
> became a committer back in November. Dan Fabulich be
2009/2/9 Henri Yandell :
> Welcoming Paul as a new committer to Commons.
Congrats Paul!
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
