Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote: >>> > Author: sebb >>> > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 2009 >>> > New Revision: 730816 >>> > >>> > URL: http://

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-02 Thread Ted Dunning
I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but instructive as predicted. Positive and negative infinity behave as expected. ** (/ 1 0.0) #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY * (/ -1 0.0) * ***#.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-INFINITY * Square roots of negative infinity work

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-02 Thread Ted Dunning
I think that (2) is the easiest for a user to understand. Obviously, the documentation aspect of (1) should be brought along. The behavior of Common Lisp is always instructive in these regards. The complex arithmetic was generally very well thought out. On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Phil Stei

Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, sebb wrote: > On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote: >> > Author: sebb >> > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 2009 >> > New Revision: 730816 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730816&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Add m

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Phil - Thanks for taking a look. Did you intend to vote on the 1.8.1 thread instead? The 2.0 vote (this thread) has closed, while the 1.8.1 one is still active (for another few hours). -Rahul On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> This is a vote to rele

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: Phil Steitz wrote: Thanks, Bernhard for the contribution in MATH-236. I would like to suggest a couple of improvements. First, I think the return type should be List, not Collection, as there is an order to the elements in the returned collection (as stated in the API doc

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: Thanks, Bernhard for the contribution in MATH-236. I would like to suggest a couple of improvements. First, I think the return type should be List, not Collection, as there is an order to the elements in the returned collection (as stated in the API doc, the order is by in

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2009-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
Rahul Akolkar wrote: This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons Digester 2.0: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/2.0/RC1/ This is a major release, with breaking changes. See release notes for corresponding details. SVN tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/rep

Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

2009-01-02 Thread sebb
On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote: > > Author: sebb > > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 2009 > > New Revision: 730816 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730816&view=rev > > Log: > > Add missing @Deprecated annotations > > > > > Which remi

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by SiegfriedGoeschl

2009-01-02 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases --

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 1.8.1

2009-01-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1, works with my compiler zoo Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons Digester > 1.8.1: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/1.8.1/RC1/ > > This is a point release, with a handful of bugfixes and improvements > from the last couple o

Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 2009 > New Revision: 730816 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730816&view=rev > Log: > Add missing @Deprecated annotations > Which reminds me -- these deprecated fields and methods can simply disappear fro

Re: [SCXML] svn commit: r730783 - in /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml: ./ env/jsp/ invoke/ io/ model/

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:38 PM, sebb wrote: > On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wrote: >> > Author: sebb >> > Date: Fri Jan 2 08:58:59 2009 >> > New Revision: 730783 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730783&view=rev >> > Log: >> > SCXM

Re: [SCXML] svn commit: r730783 - in /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml: ./ env/jsp/ invoke/ io/ model/

2009-01-02 Thread sebb
On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > > Author: sebb > > Date: Fri Jan 2 08:58:59 2009 > > New Revision: 730783 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730783&view=rev > > Log: > > SCXML-91 (1) - Test cases should only catch Exception if th

Re: [SCXML] svn commit: r730783 - in /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml: ./ env/jsp/ invoke/ io/ model/

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Fri Jan 2 08:58:59 2009 > New Revision: 730783 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730783&view=rev > Log: > SCXML-91 (1) - Test cases should only catch Exception if that is part of the > test > Thanks for improving the tests

Re: Time out Setting

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Please ask usage questions on the Commons user list. Please use the component name in square brackets in the subject since the Commons lists are shared mailing lists (in this case, use [net] in the email subject when posting to the user list). -Rahul On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:05 PM, MohanN wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 1.8.1

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 As a reminder, this vote is scheduled to close in half a day (bit over 12 hours). -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 1.8.1

2009-01-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Thanks for taking a look Oliver ... On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > I think the copyright date in NOTICE.txt has to be updated to cover 2009. I think 2008 is good since the vote was called in '08 :-) There have been no changes in '09. > Also in the releases section of t

Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > sebb wrote: >> On 02/01/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> >>> Phil Steitz a écrit : >>> >>> I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that >>> > it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not >>> sure if >>> > cha

Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: On 02/01/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that > it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sure if > changing this would cause problems, but the current setup (

Time out Setting

2009-01-02 Thread MohanN
Hi, Can someone please help me? I am new to the FTP Client stuff. I need to transfer the files from my server to other remote servers. I have a batch Job running which will transfer the files using the Apache FTPClient. If there are any issues like network issues we need to send out an email No

Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread Sujit Pal
If OpenIntToDoubleHashMap returns NaN for non-existent keys, then the Sparse Matrix could check for NaN to return 0 to its client. -sujit Phil Steitz wrote: I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sur

Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread sebb
On 02/01/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Phil Steitz a écrit : > > > I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that > > it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sure if > > changing this would cause problems, but the current setup (returning 0 > > for

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 1.8.1

2009-01-02 Thread Oliver Heger
I think the copyright date in NOTICE.txt has to be updated to cover 2009. Also in the releases section of the main site the dates for the 2.0 and 1.8.1 releases are wrong (January 2008). Everything else looks good, so +1. Oliver Rahul Akolkar schrieb: This is a vote to release the following

Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that > it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sure if > changing this would cause problems, but the current setup (returning 0 > for missing keys) limits usefulness of this class. I s

[math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?

2009-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sure if changing this would cause problems, but the current setup (returning 0 for missing keys) limits usefulness of this class. I see how this is convenient

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

2009-01-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > >> Yeah, I don't have access to a MAC, so have been reluctant to commit >> MAC-specific changes. As a non-PMC committer to commons, Mark has my >> (non-binding) +1 to becoming a commons commiter. > > if you give me detailled instructions, I can test the issue o

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

2009-01-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Bill Barker wrote: > "Mark Thomas" wrote in message > news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org... >> Folks, >> >> I have been working through some Tomcat bug reports and there are a number >> of >> commons-daemon issues - eg [1] - that are also in JIRA [2]. I'd very much >> like >> to see these issues

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-01-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-02 Thread Bernhard Grünewaldt
+1 sounds good :) Phil Steitz schrieb: > Thanks, Bernhard for the contribution in MATH-236. I would like to > suggest a couple of improvements. > > First, I think the return type should be List, not Collection, as there > is an order to the elements in the returned collection (as stated in the

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

2009-01-02 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi, I can help out on Mac OS 10.4.1 as well Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > >> Yeah, I don't have access to a MAC, so have been reluctant to commit >> MAC-specific changes. As a non-PMC committer to commons, Mark has my >> (non-binding) +1 to becoming a c

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Frankly, I don't believe Cocoon is the right place. It's too high-level. > IMO, this should either be Commons or XML Commons. > While I don't think that Cocoon is too high level for this, I actually don't care that much where the code is hosted. As long as I'm able to comm

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

2009-01-02 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, > Yeah, I don't have access to a MAC, so have been reluctant to commit > MAC-specific changes. As a non-PMC committer to commons, Mark has my > (non-binding) +1 to becoming a commons commiter. if you give me detailled instructions, I can test the issue on my Mac with 10.4.x installed. I can

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Frankly, I don't believe Cocoon is the right place. It's too high-level. IMO, this should either be Commons or XML Commons. On 02.01.2009 09:11:52 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Carsten Ziegeler > > wrote: > >> In the Cocoon proje

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: >> In the Cocoon project we're about to refactor/move some of our common >> xml stuff into an own sub project at Cocoon. This will be a small >> reusable library. So maybe we could add the common stuff from