Ralph Goers wrote on 12/29/2008 02:36:30 PM:
> On Dec 29, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > As part of the gradual shutdown of the XML project, the Xerces PMC has
> > agreed some time ago to take over the responsibility for XML Commons.
> > The xml-commons group which you mentioned
On Dec 29, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As part of the gradual shutdown of the XML project, the Xerces PMC has
agreed some time ago to take over the responsibility for XML Commons.
The xml-commons group which you mentioned is basically for committers
who only have access to XML comm
As part of the gradual shutdown of the XML project, the Xerces PMC has
agreed some time ago to take over the responsibility for XML Commons.
The xml-commons group which you mentioned is basically for committers
who only have access to XML commons (mainly Norman Walsh when he still
worked on the res
On Dec 29, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
See:
http://markmail.org/message/i4mzckmqzy2gdwsc
Xerces (responsible for XML Commons) seems open to revive XML
Commons a
bit. I think it would make sense to do Commons SAX or Commons XML in
XML
Commons, not here. I'm planning to invest
See:
http://markmail.org/message/i4mzckmqzy2gdwsc
Xerces (responsible for XML Commons) seems open to revive XML Commons a
bit. I think it would make sense to do Commons SAX or Commons XML in XML
Commons, not here. I'm planning to invest some time in this after New
Year.
On 29.12.2008 12:07:14 Pau
Erm... what about xml-commons ?
http://xml.apache.org/commons/
is this considered dropped?
At least another project that's in the realm of xml-commons is xml-
resolver, or?
Would that migrate in as well? It could but...
paul
Le 29-déc.-08 à 11:06, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 29
It may be worth quoting that:
- it's livable to be registered to commons-dev without filter (you
need a swift delete key)
- the filter practice is deep anchored until the netiquette for both
commons-dev and commons-user so that mails without the project prefix
are very quickly warned about a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I don't see why it's not a good fit for Commons. We've a few xml
> related components in the dormant section. I think a component with
> things for both SAX and DOM would be fine, and letting it grow
> organically would also work well.
Ok,
