To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
rsync runs without the --delete option because releases should never
be changed or deleted
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, but I presumed as you were using rsync that this would be taken care
> of.
>
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> but they got to t
ok, but I presumed as you were using rsync that this would be taken care
of.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
but they got to the mirrors already. I have removed them there, next
time please notify <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah I se
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but they got to the mirrors already. I have removed them there, next
> time please notify <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for taking the time, we'll try not to screw up next time I guess :-)
/niklas
--
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but they got to the mirrors already. I have removed them there, next
> time please notify <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
*sigh*
When I saw the repo diff below I quickly checked repo1 [1], and saw
only one set of ftp artifacts th
but they got to the mirrors already. I have removed them there, next
time please notify <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah I see. Actually that was my fault, as I manually uploaded the ftp jar
> initially. I have since removed my upload
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah I see. Actually that was my fault, as I manually uploaded the ftp jar
> initially. I have since removed my upload.
>
Great, looks like you and Niklas have already sorted this out.
-Rahul
> Cheers
> Rory
>
>
> Rahul Ak
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-compress has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue aff
Hi,
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I believe this is the only discussion on 2.0 I've seen on the
> dev list.
> I went and scanned the archives a while ago. Rereading this thread I
> don't really see a decision to use an Abstract class. I'm not sure I
> understand the discussion about which is more extendab
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-cli2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
12 matches
Mail list logo
