Re: [configuration] Interface vs class

2008-10-31 Thread Samuel Le Berrigaud
Hi, I have not been in the conversations before, but I am also a proponent of using interfaces. One way to enable extensions for those interfaces would be to use the capability pattern (similar to what is described here: http://java.dzone.com/news/the-capability-pattern-future- ). There could be

POI and CSV import utility

2008-10-31 Thread David Durham, Jr.
I emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] to see if there was interest in including some of my classes in their project. See the link below: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/poi-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nick mentioned that commons might be a better home for this. I'm fine with continuing to

RE: [configuration] Interface vs class

2008-10-31 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > > Look through the archives, the discussion with pros and cons went on > > promoting commons-proxy. > > Yes they did! I remember it well and I hated using a class rather > than an interface. However, I can see the merit in the decision when > it comes to maintenance and backward compatibi

Re: [configuration] Interface vs class

2008-10-31 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> FWIW, I agree. I must have missed the earlier discussion as well. I >> definitely prefer having an interface that can be used whenever a >> specific implementation is not required. > >

Re: [configuration] Interface vs class

2008-10-31 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: > FWIW, I agree. I must have missed the earlier discussion as well. I > definitely prefer having an interface that can be used whenever a > specific implementation is not required. The original arguing was, that an interface will always prevent an enhancement becaus

[dbcp] Connections closed and opened again when using fixed size pool?

2008-10-31 Thread M4N - Arjan Tijms
Hi, I'm trying to use DBCP 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 (as supplied with Tomcat 6.0.14 resp 6.0.16). I've set the pool's configuration to be a fixed size. My (test) config is this:  This seems to be a fixed size pool to me. However, in my postgresql log I see that every ~10 seconds all 5 connections

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-10-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-10-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 2