Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress (in module commons-sandbox) failed

On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that compress is in the sandox, it seems strange that it affects > so many projects. > > Do they really all depend on compress? Transitively, commons-vfs depends on commons-compress http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-sandbox/

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress (in module commons-sandbox) failed

On 06/10/2008, commons-compress development wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, > and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Project commons-compress has an

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-compress has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

Re: [JEXL] - 1.1.1 release?

No patch seen here. Please create a JIRA issue and attach the patch(es) to that. Patches to mailing lists may get overlooked - or lost, as has apparently happened here On 07/10/2008, Vishal Goenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please find a patch for the ASTBlock statement bug. I will follow up w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-compress (in module commons-sandbox) failed

Gump still tried to use a Maven 1.x build, but that doesn't work anymore. I've switched the descriptor to use Maven 2 instead, expect a few more nags until we have the correct file name of the generated jar (unfortunately Gump cannot enforce this in mvn anymore) and I am satisified with the depend

Re: [improvement] - FILEUPLOAD-168

Hi guys! Sorry for being so persistent. My previous email seems to have gone unnoticed. Here it is again if someone could be kind enough to take a look at FILEUPLOAD-168. :) Best Regards, Paul Rivera On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Paul Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'v