RE: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 10/1/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some >> plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the >> signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javadocs >> containing

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-10-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread James Carman
Shouldn't the Parent pom take care of this? On 10/1/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some > plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the > signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javad

Re: [Pipeline] contributions

2008-10-01 Thread Ken Tanaka
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Ken Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I would like to add some documentation and code changes to the Pipeline ... If you're planning on contributing often, I'll suggest that you send in a CLA. Since I'm short on email time, a

Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Rory Winston
Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javadocs containing the examples classes (its always been like that). Rory Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi

Re: [Pipeline] contributions

2008-10-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Ken Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add some documentation and code changes to the Pipeline > project. I have worked with Kris Nuttycombe on the Pipeline software, and it > is still actively used at the data center where I work. Since Kris

[Pipeline] contributions

2008-10-01 Thread Ken Tanaka
Hi, I would like to add some documentation and code changes to the Pipeline project. I have worked with Kris Nuttycombe on the Pipeline software, and it is still actively used at the data center where I work. Since Kris has not been using the Pipeline code in his current work, he is working f

Re: commons.scxml on google android

2008-10-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Jakob Sachse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > today i created such a patch. The only issue I have with it, is that I > don't know how to append binary files to it. I created a folder for my > referenced files and added also some binary files (pictures, a jar)

Re: commons.scxml on google android

2008-10-01 Thread Jakob Sachse
Hello, today i created such a patch. The only issue I have with it, is that I don't know how to append binary files to it. I created a folder for my referenced files and added also some binary files (pictures, a jar) to it. How can I append them to the JIRA issue report? Thanks -Jakob Rahul Akol

RE: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Rory, here comes part II, I try to build the jar from the src package with my compiler zoo. Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Rory, > > - the clirr report compares 2.0 against 1.4.1 instead of 1.5.0. > - the changes report is missing some information in the release history. > This is not your fault,

Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On 10/1/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under > > > > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net > > > > ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself. > > > > But is it correct? > > If not, will

Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread sebb
On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under > > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net > > ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself. > But is it correct? If not, will the incorrect location cause any problems for Maven? If the ent