On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving to a separate thread ...
>
> On 5/17/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Niall Pemberton
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akol
On 5/17/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin/Sebb
> >
> > Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with
> where
> > we're at.
>
>
> I just ran the build on both the trunk a
Moving to a separate thread ...
On 5/17/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
On 5/17/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly +1 from me on this release.
>
> A couple of minor points...
>
> 1) The changes report usually has links to the JIRA tickets, but these
> seem to be missing.
> 2) The dependencyManagement section in the parent pom only affects
> ,
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK. Everything seems therefore to be either under control or false positive
> from findbugs.
>
> I therefore change my vote to +1.
>
Great, thanks for taking another look.
-Rahul
Great! Thanks for the feedback, Niall.
Cheers
Rory
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin/Sebb
Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with where
we're at.
I just ran the build on both the tru
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Seb.
I changed the m1 build to use JUnit 3.8.1 and add the new dependency
for mockrruner:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=657477
Two tests continue to fail under JDK 1.3 (but pass using JDK 1.4)
Te
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin/Sebb
>
> Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with where
> we're at.
I just ran the build on both the trunk and net 2 branch - all looks
good - the only thing I noticed is for 1.5/trunk
Martin/Sebb
Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with
where we're at.
Rory
Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Hi all,
just wondering, what's currently holding off a release of Commons Net
1.5 / 2.0?
Many issues have been sorted out after the last release candidates, w
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>>
>> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahu
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
Whats the deal with linking to J6, as you were discussing in some JIRA comments?
No idea, Henri stated that we can't link to Java 6 in COMMONSSITE-29,
but I don't know why.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To uns
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>
> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is a vote to release the following
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>
> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is a vote to release the following
Firstly +1 from me on this release.
A couple of minor points...
1) The changes report usually has links to the JIRA tickets, but these
seem to be missing.
2) The dependencyManagement section in the parent pom only affects
, and not , so would be good pratice to specify
plugin version numbers in t
I've updated all the sandbox poms, and re-published all their web sites.
Niall
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people:
>
> Niall Pemberton
> Emmanuel Bourg
> Torsten Curdt
> Dennis Lundberg
>
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
Thanks Luc, and I appreciate the findbugs run!
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Generating the site on Linux, with maven 2 and JDK 1.6.0_06 gives me a few
warnings for tests javadoc (references not found for @link pointing to SCXML
itself). This are
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=90311&projectId=187
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 17 May 2008 10:37:32 -0700
Finished at: Sat 17 May 2008 10:38:03 -0700
Total time: 31s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=90302&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 17 May 2008 10:30:58 -0700
Finished at: Sat 17 May 2008 10:31:25 -0700
Total time: 27s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Javadoc would be nicer with external links to the JDK, JEE and
> Digester. You just have to add this in the POM:
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
>
> true
>
>
> htt
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
Its a combination of staging and the way the Commons SCXML site is
organized on c.a.o.
On the staged site, you can get to the release Javadocs
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=90298&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 17 May 2008 09:30:31 -0700
Finished at: Sat 17 May 2008 09:31:05 -0700
Total time: 34s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=90298&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 17 May 2008 09:30:31 -0700
Finished at: Sat 17 May 2008 09:31:05 -0700
Total time: 34s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people:
Niall Pemberton
Emmanuel Bourg
Torsten Curdt
Dennis Lundberg
I'll cut the release shortly, thanks
Niall
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 6 of the c
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
>
Its a combination of staging and the way the Commons SCXML site is
organized on c.a.o.
On the staged site, you can get to the release Javadocs from "Project Reports":
Thanks sebb ...
On 5/16/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks generally OK to me.
>
> Some minor points to consider (for next release?):
>
Yup, will look into these post release.
> TestingTestSuite does not seem to run any tests - it creates a suite,
> but does not add any tests to
Thanks Luc, and I appreciate the findbugs run!
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Generating the site on Linux, with maven 2 and JDK 1.6.0_06 gives me a few
> warnings for tests javadoc (references not found for @link pointing to SCXML
> itself). This are details.
>
True,
The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
Emmanuel Bourg
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
[ ] +1 for release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
[ ] +1 for release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 for release because...
Vote will close no sooner than Sunday, May 18th (sam
28 matches
Mail list logo
