Re: [VOTE] Release Commons SCXML 0.8

2008-05-16 Thread sebb
On 16/05/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/ > > > [ ] +1 for release +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 for release because... > ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons SCXML 0.8

2008-05-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Thanks for taking a look Oliver ... On 5/16/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Build works fine on JDK 1.6, all artifacts look good. > > The only minor nit I have is the checkstyle report containing 164 errors, > but I guess this is of minor importance. > Ugh, missed that. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons SCXML 0.8

2008-05-16 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Build works fine on JDK 1.6, all artifacts look good. The only minor nit I have is the checkstyle report containing 164 errors, but I guess this is of minor importance. Oliver Rahul Akolkar schrieb: This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8: http://people.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons SCXML 0.8

2008-05-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ... On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8: > > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons SCXML 0.8

2008-05-16 Thread Phil Steitz
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/ > > > [ X] +1 for release > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 for release because... >

Re: [all] commons-build-plugin fails with maven 2.0.9

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Niall, > > there were some rumors that maven-antrun-plugin is broken on maven 2.0.9 > > http://www.nabble.com/Can't-run-ant-task-in-maven-2.0.9-td17044271.html Yes, perhaps its related - I've posted a question on ma

Re: [all] commons-build-plugin fails with maven 2.0.9

2008-05-16 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Niall, there were some rumors that maven-antrun-plugin is broken on maven 2.0.9 http://www.nabble.com/Can't-run-ant-task-in-maven-2.0.9-td17044271.html Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Niall Pemberton wrote: Just a heads up that the commons-build-plugin seems to have problems with maven 2.0.9 -

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: OK good. I also added the bare bones of a site for JNet and have added it in to the list of sandbox components - should be there after the next sync: http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/index.html Again, thanks Niall! I'll continue with jnet in two weeks when I'm back fr

[all] commons-build-plugin fails with maven 2.0.9

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
Just a heads up that the commons-build-plugin seems to have problems with maven 2.0.9 - haven't had time to look at it yet, but when I tried running "mvn commons:sandbox-jira-page" I got the following error: Reverting to 2.0.8 resolved this. I'll try to look into this when I get time Niall [INF

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton schrieb: >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton schrieb: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the in

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! >>> Thanks everyone, >>> >>> I just c

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Pötz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. great. Carsten, Steven refactored the code so that internals of "parent-aware URLStreamHandlers" are hidden in an inner class an

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. great. Carsten, Steven refactored the code so that internals of "parent-aware URLStreamHandlers" are hidden in an inner class and it explicitly uses a

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Mind if I fix a few things in the maven build? We have some properities tha

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Torsten Curdt wrote: >> >> Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! >> > Thanks everyone, > > I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Mind if I fix a few things in the maven build? We have some properities that need to be s

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional co

Re: [jxpath] comments

2008-05-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Michiel Kalkman a écrit : True, on the other hand, just for my curiosity: 1. shouldn't the javaCC project be notified through some bug report ? 2. shouldn't there be an apache commons bug report which purpose is to keep track of the bug reported against the JavaCC project ? Well, that may be wo

Re: [math] should version 2.0 be targeted to Java 5 ?

2008-05-16 Thread Mauro Talevi
Phil Steitz wrote: Here is my proposal, summarizing what has been discussed so far in this thread and adding my own bias: - commons-math 2.0 will target Java 1.5 as the minimal version - the maven groupId will be changed from commons-math to org.apache.commons (the artifactID is unchanged)

Re: [jxpath] comments

2008-05-16 Thread Michiel Kalkman
True, on the other hand, just for my curiosity: 1. shouldn't the javaCC project be notified through some bug report ? 2. shouldn't there be an apache commons bug report which purpose is to keep track of the bug reported against the JavaCC project ? Just wondering ... Regards, Michiel On 5/2/08,

Re: [math] should version 2.0 be targeted to Java 5 ?

2008-05-16 Thread James Carman
Well then I might not make the jump to 2.0 then. That way, if we ever do make the jump to 2.0 (for API incompatibility reasons), we can change the package name. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. The consensus seems to keep the original package name, so this is > w

Re: [math] should version 2.0 be targeted to Java 5 ?

2008-05-16 Thread luc . maisonobe
OK. The consensus seems to keep the original package name, so this is what I will do. Thanks to all for your comments. Luc - Mail Original - De: "Rahul Akolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À: "Commons Developers List" Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Mai 2008 02:01:21 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /