To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Just realised why the Feb29 tests are not passing - not all the
relevant NET-188 patches have been applied. I'll fix trunk.
Also, the tests fail on Java 1.4.1 as well.
The tests pass on Java 1.5.0, which is presumably why you did not see
the failures.
On 07/04/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Sorry, assumed it was a recent change.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sigh. here it is - its been in there for a long time.
>
>
> Added an ant target to the Maven build to generate an FTP-only jar file,
> for clients who wish to use only FTP-based functionality.
>
>
sigh. here it is - its been in there for a long time.
Added an ant target to the Maven build to generate an FTP-only jar file,
for clients who wish to use only FTP-based functionality.
sebb wrote:
Just did - I'm none the wiser.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
look
Not sure, but they are certainly tests that need to pass.
I'm looking at how to fix them now.
The 1.5 build still contains the proposal/ftp2 tree.
This has been removed from 2.0 - should it not be removed from 1.5 as well?
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are they the te
Just did - I'm none the wiser.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> look in the changes.
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
> > > maintenance rele
are they the tests that you added?
sebb wrote:
On 06/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a maintenance
release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons
look in the changes.
sebb wrote:
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/c
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
> maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html
>
> T
On 06/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a maintenance
> release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/changes-report.html
>
>
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/changes-report.html
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/comm
Oliver Heger a écrit :
Sub packages would group classes with similar functionality. The plist
and web packages are good examples for that, but I am not sure how to
handle specific implementations consisting of only one or two classes
(e.g. INIConfiguration). Putting them in their own package pr
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The concept of an "expression" comes up within a lot
> of contexts.
> There are various ways to define/evaluate an
> expression, currently,
> but there's no standardized API way to deal with
> them. I was trying
> to come up with an API, but I don't
The concept of an "expression" comes up within a lot of contexts.
There are various ways to define/evaluate an expression, currently,
but there's no standardized API way to deal with them. I was trying
to come up with an API, but I don't know where it should belong.
Should it be part of Lang, Bean
I have created a branch to start working on a genericized Proxy API.
However, I'm running into an issue that I'm not quite sure how I
should deal with. I want to make the methods on ProxyFactory use the
varargs language feature. For example:
public Object createDelegatorProxy( ObjectProvider del
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=73772&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 6 Apr 2008 04:35:12 -0700
Finished at: Sun 6 Apr 2008 04:36:52 -0700
Total time: 1m 40s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=73772&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 6 Apr 2008 04:35:12 -0700
Finished at: Sun 6 Apr 2008 04:36:52 -0700
Total time: 1m 40s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numbe
18 matches
Mail list logo
