On 24/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:07 AM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Right. I woul
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
I was looking at the Operations API which seems to imply that the developer
would be able to provide their own operations for different types of file
systems. The only example seems to be a version control system which at
present seems to be just a collection of interfaces. I was wondering if
som
I'd love more input from anybody interested in
Collections so we can figure out what, if anything, is
needed to get us to the point that we can continue
adding useful items to [collections].
-Matt
--- Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki pag
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Collections
--
J
Thanks for that Matt, hopefully will translate to lots of
ExtendedMessageFormat users :)
Hen
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what I've done is enough. Let me know if you
> think anything needs more explanation.
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> --- Matt Benso
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Collections/Collections3x
On 3/23/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:07 AM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Right. I would not put the to-be-voted-on candidate there, just the
> > > RCs le