Re: [sandbox] Component ideas

Henri, Is your timing just a coincidence? http://lists.juliusdavies.ca/pipermail/not-yet-commons-ssl-juliusdavies.ca/2008-March/000102.html I was just going to sit down and finally rewrite my old incubator wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CommonsSSLProposal), but maybe I should

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons IO

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62012&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Error Started at: Thu 6 Mar 2008 17:32:44 -0800 Finished at: Thu 6 Mar 2008 17:34:28 -0800 Total time: 1m 44s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number

Re: svn commit: r620174 - /commons/proper/io/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/io/IOUtils.java

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All: > > In short: Feel free to revert. OK I've reverted: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=634470 Niall > In detail: > > Ah, sorry about the formatting, it was not my intention to commit the > generic

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > >> > mistake

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

Niall Pemberton wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local r

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo > > (sorry!).

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

+1

[ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons Proxy 1.0

We are pleased to announce the Commons Proxy 1.0 release. Commons Proxy makes creating dynamic proxies in Java easy! Please visit the Commons Proxy site for more information. Thank you, Commons Proxy Development Team ---

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

Niall Pemberton wrote: I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by mistake) it had used a patched copy of the maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Java version on the dependencies page. The

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > maven-project-info-reports-plugin

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

sebb wrote: On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by mistake) it had used a patched copy of the maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to incl

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

+1 from me Niall On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies, I'd like to do another (version 9) commons-parent release > (hopefully the last for a while) - the changes since the last release > are: > > - Use the maven-bundle-plugin to gener

Re: [all] Junit 3.8.2 jar is not Java 1.3 compatible

On 06/03/2008, Hasan Diwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just discovered that JUnit 3.8.2 contains a 1.4+ method call: > > > > Boolean.valueOf(boolean) > > > > This is used by the methods: > > > >assertEquals([String message,]

Re: [all] Junit 3.8.2 jar is not Java 1.3 compatible

On 06/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just discovered that JUnit 3.8.2 contains a 1.4+ method call: > > Boolean.valueOf(boolean) > > This is used by the methods: > >assertEquals([String message,] boolean expected, boolean actual) > > So any builds that are intended for 1.

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by NiallPemberton

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi The comment on the change is: Add notes/links to Felix (re)bundle of commons project

[all] Junit 3.8.2 jar is not Java 1.3 compatible

I've just discovered that JUnit 3.8.2 contains a 1.4+ method call: Boolean.valueOf(boolean) This is used by the methods: assertEquals([String message,] boolean expected, boolean actual) So any builds that are intended for 1.3 should ensure that they are using 3.8.1, rather than 3.8.2 (w

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

+1 On 3/5/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry correct URL for the diffs since the last release is here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=631209&r2=634135&diff_format=h > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Niall Pemberton > <[

Re: [all] jakarta still appearing in Reply-to header

On 06/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a > reference to > Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I think the > header is already set up like this from the beginning. For t

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

Gary Gregory a écrit : Really nice ! If you have some time to add Commons Configuration that would be great. Et hop: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html#commons-configuration-1.5 Thank you! The failure on Java 1.3 is not surprising (missing JDBC classes that can't be fetched automat

RE: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

> [X] +1 > [ ] =0 > [ ] -1 - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[all] jakarta still appearing in Reply-to header

Hello, It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a reference to Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I think the header is already set up like this from the beginning. For the dev list, it reads: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" I t

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

+1 Selon Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Apologies, I'd like to do another (version 9) commons-parent release > (hopefully the last for a while) - the changes since the last release > are: > > - Use the maven-bundle-plugin to generate an OSGi manifest file > (rather than the whole

RE: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

> -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:12 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites > > Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Feel free to use this compatibility informat