Re: [configuration] Type conversion

2008-02-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger a écrit : This looks pretty good to me. Just a question about the convert() methods: What is the meaning of the params var arg parameter and where do the actual values come from? That's the same vararg used currently by PropertyConverter.to(), it's used to specify a date format

Re: [configuration] Type conversion

2008-02-29 Thread Oliver Heger
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb: Hi, I've been working on the type conversion lately, it's almost complete, I still have to refactor the unit tests and write the docs. Here is what I plan to commit: - A new Converter interface is introduced in the o.a.c.c.converter package. This interface has a sing

Re: svn commit: r631284 - /commons/proper/net/branches/NET_2_0/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/FTPTimestampParserImpl.java

2008-02-29 Thread Jake Harmon
I don't think this will work, because in Jan 2009, if you get a file from Feb 29 and try to parse it using the current year, it will also fail. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/svn-commit%3A-r631284commons-proper-net-branches-NET_2_0-src-main-java-org-apache-commons-ne

Re: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread Mark Fortner
yanfs uses a BSD license. I think that's compatible. You can see the project here: http://yanfs.dev.java.net Mark On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Fortner skrev den 29-02-2008 17:18: > > I have an NFS implementation (using Sun's YANFS

Re: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mark Fortner skrev den 29-02-2008 17:18: I have an NFS implementation (using Sun's YANFS implementation) that I'm in the process of testing. I also have GUI components (a file chooser, and a basic file browser) in addition to a metadata API for reading image and MS Office metadata. I'd be glad

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-02-29 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread Mark Fortner
I have an NFS implementation (using Sun's YANFS implementation) that I'm in the process of testing. I also have GUI components (a file chooser, and a basic file browser) in addition to a metadata API for reading image and MS Office metadata. I'd be glad to donate any or all of these if there's an

Re: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mario Ivankovits skrev den 29-02-2008 10:41: Hi, IMHO major problem is the necessary environment. You may have one or two of the supported external virtual file systems, but as soon as you start to modify core classes, you have no clue about the effects for the other systems ... :-/

Re: [all] M2 Dependency Version Ranges...

2008-02-29 Thread James Carman
On 2/29/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 2/29/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> All, >> > >> >> In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency ver

RE: [all] M2 Dependency Version Ranges...

2008-02-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 2/29/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> >> In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency version declared >> >> like this: >> >> >> >> >> org.slf4j >> >>

Re: [all] M2 Dependency Version Ranges...

2008-02-29 Thread James Carman
On 2/29/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency version declared > >> like this: > >> > >> > >> org.slf4j > >> slf4j-api > >> [1.4.0,)

RE: [all] M2 Dependency Version Ranges...

2008-02-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: > On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All, >> >> In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency version declared >> like this: >> >> >> org.slf4j >> slf4j-api >> [1.4.0,) >> true >> >> >> With this, maven will download the latest version of SLF4J

Re: [all] M2 Dependency Version Ranges...

2008-02-29 Thread sebb
On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency version declared like this: > > > org.slf4j > slf4j-api > [1.4.0,) > true > > > With this, maven will download the latest version of SLF4J (1.5.0 I > believe) and use that

[pool] New DBCP deadlock reported (DBCP-44)

2008-02-29 Thread Phil Steitz
Pool 1.4 has made DBCP-44 worse. The synchronization changes implemented to address other issues in pool 1.4 have created more opportunities for Evictor / client contention for locks on the pool and factory-related objects. The stack trace added to DBCP-44 on 27-feb-08 shows a new deadlock. That

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread James Carman
On 2/29/08, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > I've been using the project for the last 6 months or so and haven't seen > > very many commits or activity on JIRA. Is there intention for on going > > support? > > > > As long as no code work needs to be done I think support is

RE: commons-vfs current status?

2008-02-29 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi, >IMHO major problem is the necessary environment. You may have one or two of >the supported external virtual file systems, but as soon as you start to >modify core classes, you have no clue about the effects for the other systems >... :-/ There exists a VMWare image with everything setup