Re: about sending several emails in a batch

2008-02-24 Thread zheng hao
you mean the current implementation, I see. we mean the same idea. On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * /** > * Sends the email. Internally we build a MimeMessage > * which is afterwards sent to the SMTP server. > * > * @return the message id of

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by NiallPemberton

2008-02-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi -- || la

[Announcement] Apache Commons Math 1.2 released

2008-02-24 Thread Phil Steitz
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.2 of Commons Math. Commons Math is a Java library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components addressing common problems not available in the Java programming language or Commons Lang. Version 1.2 com

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, now it works for me. So +1 for the release. Likewise +1 > Oliver > > James Carman schrieb: > > > On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can > >> re-che

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Okay, now it works for me. So +1 for the release. Oliver James Carman schrieb: On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can re-check them? Done. Sorry about the mix-up. I should have verified them myself. I think what

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread James Carman
On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can > re-check them? Done. Sorry about the mix-up. I should have verified them myself. I think what screwed it up was me monkeying with the "phase" for the gpg plugin. Apparently "

Re: download page broken

2008-02-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Disregard. Replication worked On 2/24/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made changes for the math 1.2 release, republished the site and > later fixed permissions on the cgis. The site must have replicated > before I did the permissions fix and it has now been more than an > hour, so I

download page broken

2008-02-24 Thread Phil Steitz
I made changes for the math 1.2 release, republished the site and later fixed permissions on the cgis. The site must have replicated before I did the permissions fix and it has now been more than an hour, so I suspect regen and (quick) perm fix is necessary (I guess the perm change is not picked up

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > > > with veryfying the signatures. > > > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread James Carman
On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > > with veryfying the signatures. > > > > I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because >

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > with veryfying the signatures. > > I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because > there have been some commits to KEYS later on. So this may

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread Oliver Heger
The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem with veryfying the signatures. I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because there have been some commits to KEYS later on. So this may be a problem with my setup. Did anybody else check the signatures?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-02-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: about sending several emails in a batch

2008-02-24 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
* /** * Sends the email. Internally we build a MimeMessage * which is afterwards sent to the SMTP server. * * @return the message id of the underlying MimeMessage * @throws EmailException the sending failed */ public String send() throws EmailException { this.buildMimeMessage(); retu

[RESULT][VOTE] Release version 1.0 of commons-build-plugin based on RC2

2008-02-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
This votes has passed with three +1 votes (all binding) from the following: Sebastian Bazley Dennis Lundberg Niall Pemberton thanks - I'll finish up on the release later today Niall On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to release commons-build-p

Re: [VOTE] Release version 1.0 of commons-build-plugin based on RC2

2008-02-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
Never really sure if we actually need to vote on our own proposals - but +1 from me in case. Niall On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to release commons-build-plugin 1.0 based on rc2. > > The main differences from rc1 are improvements/correctio