Hi,
I have two thoughts along the line
+) using the Commons Email API you get access to the underlying
MimeMessage which is pretty much the "clean bean email" you are looking for
+) the fact that a Email can send itself is "inversion of control" but
the bad one - using some sort of transport l
Hi Niall,
not sure if I'm part of the gang but I will be there from Sunday to
Friday ... :-)
Siegfried Goeschl
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'm going to be there - perhaps we could have an informal get together
if there are a few of us?
Niall
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a ?crit :
> > The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two
> > issues have been opened.
> >
> > I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable
> > with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for
> > MA
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry I don't really understand why you're referring to developer
> pages and pom/skin sites? Where does that come into this?
Someone suggested that I have a page which describes how to build the software.
>
>
> Niall
-
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall,
> >
> > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom?
>
> Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:25 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Niall,
> > >
> > > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom?
> >
On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, James Carman
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
> > >
>
On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
> >
Oops, sorry, my bad ...
> > I have looked through some of the other
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall,
> >
> > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom?
>
>
> Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not
> sure if it would
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
> >
> > I have looked through some of the other projects and none of those
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall,
>
> Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom?
Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not
sure if it would mess up doing pom or skin releases which don't.
Niall
> On 2/21/08, [EMAI
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
>
> I have looked through some of the other projects and none of those
> have their KEYS file in there. I'm not saying you're wrong. Is this
>
Nope, we moved to a single Commons-wide KEYS file a while back. It can
be found here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/KEYS
sebb wrote:
Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When you say "root" do you mean proxy's root (sam
On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
I have looked through some of the other projects and none of those
have their KEYS file in there. I'm not saying you're wrong. Is this
something new?
>
>
> On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whe
Phil Steitz a écrit :
The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two
issues have been opened.
I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable
with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for
MATH-195), but I don't want to do this preempti
Proxy root, same as pom.xml.
On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you say "root" do you mean proxy's root (same directory as the
> pom.xml file) or do you mean http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf?
>
>
> On 2/21/08, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Wiki user,
When you say "root" do you mean proxy's root (same directory as the
pom.xml file) or do you mean http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf?
On 2/21/08, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
> change notificat
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by sebbapache:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by JamesCarman:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
--
r
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by JamesCarman:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
I put in some comments asking for some clarifications.
On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about creating a temporary page on the Commons Wiki with this
> information?
> >
> > Once the process has been nailed down and tested, it should be moved
> > to the formal website.
>
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by sebbapache:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
DRAFT Procedure for creating a release using M2
New pa
Niall,
Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom?
On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Thu Feb 21 09:13:27 2008
> New Revision: 629875
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629875&view=rev
> Log:
> Attach assembly to "package" phase in "r
On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about creating a temporary page on the Commons Wiki with this information?
>
> Once the process has been nailed down and tested, it should be moved
> to the formal website.
>
I like this idea! I can try to update it with anything I run into as
I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 17:43 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 2/20/0
On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 2/
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Yup, sorry abo
On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think
> > > following this t
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think
> > following this thread:
> > http://commons.markmail.org/message/vw3ckyjakjgbdlbu
> >
>
Sorry, I meant MATH-195 in the second to last sentence below.
On 2/21/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two
> issues have been opened.
>
> I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable
> with marking
On 21/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two
> issues have been opened.
>
> I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable
> with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for
> MA
The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two
issues have been opened.
I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable
with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for
MATH-195), but I don't want to do this preemptively without giving
othe
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think
> following this thread:
> http://commons.markmail.org/message/vw3ckyjakjgbdlbu
>
> ...but no-one has go round to updating the docs. The other part of the
> equation is
Hi,
I am using FTPClient to put file in remote servers. The code works fine in
the local server(inside of my company), but always got time out problem in the
outside server(client's FTP server). I manually used command line ftp to the
outside server without any problem. I searched on t
*cough* Ignore that mail, my mailed marked it as new for some reason :)
Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Dumb question, why is there already a revision 1.1 published last
september in the Maven 2 repository ?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-email/1.1/
http://mirrors.ibiblio.o
Dumb question, why is there already a revision 1.1 published last
september in the Maven 2 repository ?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-email/1.1/
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-email/1.1/
Emmanuel Bourg
-
I have found the redirectTestOutputToFile property that should redirect
the output when set to true, but the output files created are empty :(
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
sebb wrote:
> On 21/02/2008, Jörg Schaible
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> > On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
>> >> test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything
On 21.02.2008, at 12:01, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on
the console ? That's how Maven 1 proceeded an
On 21/02/2008, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> >> Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
> >> test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on
> >> the console
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
>> test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on
>> the console ? That's how Maven 1 proceeded and I found this quite
>> useful.
>
> Th
On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on
the console ? That's how Maven 1 proceeded and I found this quite
useful.
Thought that was the default also
Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the test
output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on the
console ? That's how Maven 1 proceeded and I found this quite useful.
Thanks,
Emmanuel Bourg
---
46 matches
Mail list logo
