On 2/1/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/02/2008, Yegor Bryukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can build [math] using maven 2, which is now the primary build
> > > platform for this component. The Ant build should also work.
> > >
> >
> > http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.
On 2/1/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb a écrit :
> > > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Their ha
On 02/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb a écrit :
> > > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thei
On 01/02/2008, Yegor Bryukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can build [math] using maven 2, which is now the primary build
> > platform for this component. The Ant build should also work.
> >
>
> http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.html
> refers to http://commons.apache.org/building.htm
On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
> > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have
> >
sebb a écrit :
On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
What about preparing 1.2 release ?
Good idea
> You can build [math] using maven 2, which is now the primary build
> platform for this component. The Ant build should also work.
>
http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.html
refers to http://commons.apache.org/building.html
which mentions Maven 1.0.2 only
> Maven 1.0.2 is still also avail
On 2/1/08, Yegor Bryukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> done, MATH-184
>
> as for a patch, yesterday I tried to download Maven 1.0.2 from Apache
> mirrors to build the library but could not find a single mirror where
> it would still be available. And Maven 1.1 complains about
> "Unrecognised tag: '
done, MATH-184
as for a patch, yesterday I tried to download Maven 1.0.2 from Apache
mirrors to build the library but could not find a single mirror where
it would still be available. And Maven 1.1 complains about
"Unrecognised tag: 'optional'" in project.xml
:(
On Feb 1, 2008 4:57 PM, Phil Steit
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2008 1:19 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Niall / Stuart,
> >
> > thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns
> > of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just
> > a bit diffe
On 2/1/08, Yegor Bryukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cumulativeProbability((double)x, (double)x) returns 0 for
> discrete/integer distributions
>
> I suppose AbstractIntegerDistribution.cumulativeProbability(double,
> double) should be overridden to call its (int, int) version instead of
> using
On 01.02.2008, at 21:09, nicolas de loof wrote:
Hello,
Many apache commons have no -source.jar bundle in maven "central"
repo. I've
created some of them based on the official source distribution for my
personnal use.
Would you allow me use
/x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-re
Interesting to see so different results for same JRE on Windows and SunOs.
This demonstrates that such bench are never a final answer to java
performance questions !
Another such example is moksito test to compare synchronized to java5
Atomics. On Sun JRE perfs are the oposite to Bea JRockit ones
Win XP Intel Core(2) T5500 1.66GHz
System.nanoTime took : 2064849583ns
System.currentTimeMillis took : 62748478ns
java version "1.5.0_13"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_13-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_13-b05, mixed mode)
On Hudson:
java v
My personnal result (Windows XP AMD Athlon XP 2800+):
C:\>java -version
java version "1.6.0_03"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_03-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_03-b05, mixed mode)
System.nanoTime took : 1432396575ns
System.currentTimeMillis took : 61866802n
Hello,
Many apache commons have no -source.jar bundle in maven "central" repo. I've
created some of them based on the official source distribution for my
personnal use.
Would you allow me use
/x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ for adding them,
or do you prefer a more form
and without stupide copy/paste colorde formatting :
public class CurrentTimeMillisVsNanoTime
{
static int loops = 100;
/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main( String[] args )
{
long time = System.nanoTime();
long t;
for ( int i = 0; i
I didn't commit from my office, but the bench looks like :
*
public* *class* CurrentTimeMillisVsNanoTime
{
*static* *int* *loops* = 100;
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] args
*/
*public* *static* *void* main( String[] args )
{
*long* time = System.*nanoTime*();
*long* t;
*for* ( *int* i = 0;
And I could probably run it on OpenVMS
;-)
On 01/02/2008, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> if I either find the test code (or you commit it) I can tell you on Mac
> OS X :-)
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> nicolas de loof wrote:
> > on java < 5 backport-util-concurren
Hi Nicolas,
if I either find the test code (or you commit it) I can tell you on Mac
OS X :-)
Siegfried Goeschl
nicolas de loof wrote:
on java < 5 backport-util-concurrent is required to provide
System.nanotime()
I've no idea of the result of such a bench on other JVM /
architectures.
I'm sorry if I resent this email. Actually, I didn't know if I was
sending this mail correctly.
Thanks.
Rodrigo
Em 1/2/2008 13:41, Niall Pemberton escreveu:
On Feb 1, 2008 3:22 PM, Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
I'm Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes and I'd like to d
cumulativeProbability((double)x, (double)x) returns 0 for
discrete/integer distributions
I suppose AbstractIntegerDistribution.cumulativeProbability(double,
double) should be overridden to call its (int, int) version instead of
using default one from AbstractDistribution
--
Best regards,
Yegor
_
On Feb 1, 2008 4:07 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to add bnd 0.0.236 to the maven repo so I can try
> > out these new features with Felix's bundle plugin?
> >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2
Hi Rodrigo,
It's great to see your offered patch. Thanks. And don't worry about your
English; everyone understands about that.
BeanUtils has only a couple of active developers, so how long it takes
until someone can look at your code depends very much on how busy those
people happen to be now.
T
Use Morph @ morph.sourceforge.net. ;)
-Matt
--- Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes and I'd like to do some
> contributions to
> commons apache project (despite my poor English
> Knowledge).
>
> So, I have one problem with
> BeanUtil
on java < 5 backport-util-concurrent is required to provide System.nanotime()
I've no idea of the result of such a bench on other JVM / architectures.
I'll try it on some of my corporate servers (solaris / linux ...)
Having two timing modes would be a solution as you proposed.
2008/2/1, Siegfri
On Feb 1, 2008 3:22 PM, Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes and I'd like to do some contributions to
> commons apache project (despite my poor English Knowledge).
>
> So, I have one problem with BeanUtils.copyProperties: From a source, I
>
Hi all!
I'm Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes and I'd like to do some contributions to
commons apache project (despite my poor English Knowledge).
So, I have one problem with BeanUtils.copyProperties: From a source, I
have a bean partialy populated. From another source, I have the same
bean with oth
On Feb 1, 2008 1:19 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Niall / Stuart,
>
> thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns
> of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just
> a bit different: Apache focuses on packages whereas Eclipse
> focuses on Bundle granu
On Jan 31, 2008 3:01 PM, Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's useless to add a "uses" directive for
> > packages that are in the same bundle.
> It is also harmless ... Besides, the important issue is that it lists
> private packages, which is not wrong but useless.
>
> > At
> > Ec
Hi Nicolas,
a few thoughts
+) I use dynamic proxies together with JAMon to measure the execution
time of method invocations - ns would make a lot of sense here
+) the execution times also depend on you JVM since you are using JRockit
+) and finally it depends how often you start/stop a monitor
Hello,
For commons-monitoring my first intent was to use System.nanotime() to
compute code performances. A simple bench [1] demonstrates that
System.currentTimeMillis is FAR quicker to return current time (on my
windows box [2]) :
nanoseconds precision may be usefull for profilers, but is it for
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> > fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
> >
> > What about preparing 1.2 release ?
> >
>
On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
>
> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
>
Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
Hello Niall / Stuart,
thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns
of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just
a bit different: Apache focuses on packages whereas Eclipse
focuses on Bundle granularity for Re-use.
That's why we don't explicitly import all exported packages
Hi all!
I'm Rodrigo di Lorenzo Lopes and I'd like to do some contributions to
commons apache project (despite my poor English Knowledge).
So, I have one problem with BeanUtils.copyProperties: From a source, I
have a bean partialy populated. From another source, I have the same
bean with oth
Hello,
Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
What about preparing 1.2 release ?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
Hi Simon,
these are interesting new - I have a look at it. I personally thing that
a proper SVN report is a must have since it simplifies reviewing of code
changes (I guess I might be overly formal here)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Siegfried,
Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi folks,
>
> since my last releases of Fulcrum components reminded me of the dark
> ages of release management I decided to move Fulcrum to M2
> +) I still have problems with the svn report - it picks up everything
> which I
Hi folks,
since my last releases of Fulcrum components reminded me of the dark
ages of release management I decided to move Fulcrum to M2
+) I added a fulcrum-parent project to SVN
+) I migrated fulcrum-yaafi to a M2 build while M1 still works
+) since "site:deploy" works now - a first draft o
41 matches
Mail list logo
