[configuration] DatabaseConfiguration - should it escape SQL?

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
Should the DatabaseConfiguration class be responsible for protecting against SQL Injection, or should we make sure the javadoc states that it offers no protection and leave that up to the user? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Simon Kitching
Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last > > release used commons-parent version 4 and the only changes are to > > upgrade to the latest version 7 of commons-parent and update the > > plugin

[pool] trunk?

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
Is development back on trunk yet? Having it off on a branch worries me :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [lang] 2.4 on 1.4?

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
If that's the only 1.4 bit, then we should target 1.3 and hit 1.5 with Lang 3.0/LangTwo (depending on whether the API changes horribly). Hen On Jan 16, 2008 3:05 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a dependency in StringEscapeUtils on a Java 1.4 method. Is this > intentional?

[math] proposal: ZipfDistribution (code available)

2008-01-16 Thread Paul Cowan
Hi all, I'd like to propose adding a Zipf (or Zipfian) integer distribution to commons-math. The Zipf distribution is a distribution which (approximately) reflects many 'real-world' phenomena, e.g. the frequency of use of words in a language. I have a patch available, including test case;

[VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC3

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
The changes since RC2 are: - Separate out tests requiring JDK 1.4 and change ant build to run tests depending on JDK version - Correct m1 and ant builds to use the same "target" option as the m2 build The artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-1.4-RC3/ SVN Tag: http://svn.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 16, 2008 9:16 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:07 PM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2 > > > > On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAI

[lang] 2.4 on 1.4?

2008-01-16 Thread Gary Gregory
There is a dependency in StringEscapeUtils on a Java 1.4 method. Is this intentional? The build properties for Ant and Maven still refer to 1.3 as the source level. I have a fix ready for StringEscapeUtils. Or the build properties should be updated. Thank you. Gary Gregory Senior Software Eng

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Oliver Heger
I found no problems with the artifacts. All build variants worked for me on JDK 1.6. The only thing I noticed is that the md5 files do not follow the default format used for most commons components (they do not contain the flags and the file name). The argument with the JDK 1.3 compatibility t

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Gary Gregory
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:07 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2 > > On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2008 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread sebb
On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:21 AM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton wrote: I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last release used commons-parent version 4 and the only changes are to upgrade to the latest version 7 of commons-parent and update the plugin versions to the latest. +1 ---

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 On Jan 16, 2008 11:48 AM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 with thanks. > > > On Jan 16, 2008 10:30 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 16, 2008 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:21 AM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2 > > > > On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Ben Speakmon
+1 with thanks. On Jan 16, 2008 10:30 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last > > release used commons-parent version 4 and the only changes are to > > upgrade to the latest

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
I've found the example proposal in the sandbox/project-template. I'll publish one soon. 2008/1/16, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 1/16/08, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 Niall Pemberton wrote: Hi, I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last release used commons-parent version 4 and the only changes are to upgrade to the latest version 7 of commons-parent and update the plugin versions to the latest. A full diff of the pom.xml can be

Re: [m2 & m1] pom.xml / project.xml cleanup / formatting

2008-01-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Niall Pemberton wrote: I'd like to go through all the component m2 poms making them all consistent with 4 spaces indentation. IMO its easier to read and also if they're all consistent its easier to copy bits between them. Since many components are still using m1 it makes life easier to maintain b

Re: svn commit: r612386 - /commons/proper/math/trunk/pom.xml

2008-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/16/08, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > - See the License for the specific mathuage governing permissions > > Guess org.apache.commons.lang was the template used for this file :-) > > :1,$s/lang/math/g > Found another such instance in [math],

Re: [m2 & m1] pom.xml / project.xml cleanup / formatting

2008-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/16/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to go through all the component m2 poms making them all > consistent with 4 spaces indentation. IMO its easier to read and also > if they're all consistent its easier to copy bits between them. Since > many components are still using

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/16/08, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > commons ? > In addition to what Hen said, IMO its good to have a slightly

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Gary Gregory
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:21 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2 > > On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2008 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
> > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > Done. Thanks > > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > > commons ? > > You'll know when you break them ;) > > Generally (new) components are using m2 for the build system and JDK > 1.5 dependent

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
On Jan 16, 2008 12:13 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? Done. > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > commons ? You'll know when you break them ;) Generally

Re: [m2 & m1] pom.xml / project.xml cleanup / formatting

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
On Jan 16, 2008 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to go through all the component m2 poms making them all > consistent with 4 spaces indentation. IMO its easier to read and also > if they're all consistent its easier to copy bits between them. Since > many components ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread sebb
On 16/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The manifest created by the M2 build includes the following: > > > > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_07 > > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 > > > > so yes, the actual bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 16, 2008 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The manifest created by the M2 build includes the following: > > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_07 > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 > > so yes, the actual build JDK is shown, but so are the intended versions. > > For javac, the sou

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread sebb
The manifest created by the M2 build includes the following: Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_07 X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 so yes, the actual build JDK is shown, but so are the intended versions. For javac, the source and target setting have limited effect in that they don't affect the

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by NiallPemberton

2008-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi -- === C

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 16, 2008 3:38 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only Ant can specify the actual target JDK used to compile the code in the > Manifest. Maven has an open issue for this in the jar plugin. Alot of people > want to write the target JDK to the manifest, but unfortunately the actual

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by SimonKitching

2008-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SimonKitching: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi The comment on the change is: Add info re commons-logging and osgi ---

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by NiallPemberton

2008-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi -- || di

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsOsgi" by NiallPemberton

2008-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi New page: === Commons OSGi === The [http://felix.apache.org/ Apache Felix] project hav

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Paul Benedict
Only Ant can specify the actual target JDK used to compile the code in the Manifest. Maven has an open issue for this in the jar plugin. Alot of people want to write the target JDK to the manifest, but unfortunately the actual JDK version (e.g., 1.6) appears. Paul On Jan 16, 2008 8:58 AM, Niall P

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 16, 2008 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Found what appear to be some build problems: > > "ant dist" creates a Manifest entry of: > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1 > > whereas the (M2) distribution has: > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 > > This is probably due to > > project.properties:

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread sebb
Found what appear to be some build problems: "ant dist" creates a Manifest entry of: X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1 whereas the (M2) distribution has: X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 This is probably due to project.properties: maven.compile.target = 1.1 which affects M1 builds as well. == The Ant Ma

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Pool 1.4 Released

2008-01-16 Thread Phil Steitz
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.4 of Commons Pool. Commons Pool provides a general purpose object pooling API, an implementation toolkit and some pool implementations. Version 1.4 is a maintenance release including numerous bug fixes. This release is source

[VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 3 (2nd attempt)

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi, I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last release used commons-parent version 4 and the only changes are to upgrade to the latest version 7 of commons-parent and update the plugin versions to the latest. A full diff of the pom.xml can be found at this address: http:

[m2 & m1] pom.xml / project.xml cleanup / formatting

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'd like to go through all the component m2 poms making them all consistent with 4 spaces indentation. IMO its easier to read and also if they're all consistent its easier to copy bits between them. Since many components are still using m1 it makes life easier to maintain both if they are formatted

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
Sorry in the changes section that should have read "Fix an error in the FileWriterWithEncoding JavaDocs" rather than just "fix an error in the". Niall On Jan 16, 2008 10:51 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have been a few changes since RC1, but since they were all IMO > mino

[VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC2

2008-01-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
There have been a few changes since RC1, but since they were all IMO minor, I've cut a RC2 and thought would proceed straight to a vote. The changes since RC1 are: - changes to build.xml to keep gump happy - fix an error in the - upgrade to version 7 and commons-parent (and remove stuff fro

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-01-16 Thread dIon Gillard
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: svn commit: r612386 - /commons/proper/math/trunk/pom.xml

2008-01-16 Thread Simon Kitching
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > - See the License for the specific mathuage governing permissions Guess org.apache.commons.lang was the template used for this file :-) :1,$s/lang/math/g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
I'm ok with the graduate rule. Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other commons ? Nico. 2008/1/15, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 1/15/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 15, 200