To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Yes, the configuration2-packaged classes should be part of the 2.x
release series.
On 12/18/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> So I will probably follow this road. This is a good opportunity for a
> >> refactoring and polishing of some interfaces and base
> >> classes. Because
> >>
So I will probably follow this road. This is a good opportunity for a
refactoring and polishing of some interfaces and base
classes. Because
we will have major changes, changing the package name (maybe to
o.a.c.configuration2?) will certainly make sense.
I'd go for o.a.c.configuration2 here.
s
Hi Oliver,
[snip]
Oliver Heger wrote:
> This is pretty much the reaction I was hoping for :-)
>
> So I will probably follow this road. This is a good opportunity for a
> refactoring and polishing of some interfaces and base
> classes. Because
> we will have major changes, changing the package na
+1 everything looks ok for me so far.
On 12/16/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote for releasing the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.7:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc2/
>
>
> [ ] +1 for release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 for
