Re: [JCI] Moving fam module to Commons IO

2007-10-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/20/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Niall, > > Thanks for looking into that. But frankly speaking I am not a big fan > of that for a couple of reasons. > > That would make it the 3rd FAM implementation in the commons > codebase. There already is commons-jci-fam, the commons-

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1

2007-10-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
What is your conclusion? Should we leave things the way they are and maybe add JRockit as a "known issue" on the wiki? Jörg Schaible wrote: Dennis Lundberg wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Dennis, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi It's about time to get commons-logging 1.1.1 released. Release Not

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1

2007-10-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Dennis, >> >> Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> It's about time to get commons-logging 1.1.1 released. >>> >>> Release Notes: >>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1

2007-10-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Dennis, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi It's about time to get commons-logging 1.1.1 released. Release Notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160 Tag: https://svn.apache.org/re

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1

2007-10-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Dennis, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi It's about time to get commons-logging 1.1.1 released. Release Notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160 Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/l

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1

2007-10-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Dennis, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > It's about time to get commons-logging 1.1.1 released. > > Release Notes: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160 > > Tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tag

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-10-20 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-10-20 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [JCI] Moving fam module to Commons IO

2007-10-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
Hey Niall, Thanks for looking into that. But frankly speaking I am not a big fan of that for a couple of reasons. That would make it the 3rd FAM implementation in the commons codebase. There already is commons-jci-fam, the commons-vfs fam and then we would also have the commons-io fam.

Re: [validator] svn commit: r585762 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/InetAddressValidator.java test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/

2007-10-20 Thread Ben Speakmon
Ack. My filter ate this conversation; sorry for not seeing it earlier. This is my new machine and I forgot to twiddle the svn props. I'll get that sorted out. On 10/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/18/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/17/07, [EMAIL P