[Math] rolling calculations with lag

2007-09-22 Thread Bradford Cross
Greetings! Recently I stumbled into the Commons math project; nice design, good abstractions, "smart updates" and even unit tests! :-) the Smart updates are a key feature for event stream processing / time series simulation. The only piece that is missing from a time series analysis and simulati

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1

2007-09-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
I believe we said that we're not keen on changing groupIds for components that have had releases ( WRT r575823 [1] ). -Rahul [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=575823 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons FileUpload

2007-09-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=7617&projectId=166 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 22 Sep 2007 14:32:00 -0700 Finished at: Sat 22 Sep 2007 14:32:20 -0700 Total time: 20s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Num

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1

2007-09-22 Thread Ben Speakmon
> I agree with Oliver though that the backward compat isssue requires a > major version bump and ideally deprecation before that. Any way it > can be worked around? Sure, I can just rename the new field and deprecate the new one. A few more observations. > > 1) I notice that the src distro incl

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1

2007-09-22 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/19/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *groan* *shuffle* > > a zombie commons project rises to stalk the earth again, hungry for votes... > > Seriously, it'll be two years next Saturday since 1.0 was released, and > after a fair bit of work on closing existing bugs and adding simple

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1

2007-09-22 Thread Oliver Heger
The artifacts all look good to me, so I would be +1. However this breaking change concerns me. Our versioning guidelines so far have been that a binary incompatible release must have a new major version number. In this concrete case, as I understand it, impact seems to be pretty low. Neverthel

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-09-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-09-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th