Currently the main package name for Commons CLI 2.x is:
org.apache.commons.cli2
Is there actually a need for a change of package name from:
org.apache.commons.cli
If it is allowed I would propose that the 2.x line just uses the same
package name as the 1.x line.
--
Russel.
Hi Wolfgang,
I agree that the framework should have better support for groups and mutually
exclusive options. This is a feature I've often had to do in a pre or post
processing step.
I've thought about writing a CLI library which would accept a EBNF option
grammar, much like JavaCC or ANTLR
Gene Wu wrote:
Hi,
I got some failed results from test class
"org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration".
The error is "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress".
I run build.xml and pom.xml. The error messages are the same. There is no
javamail depende
Hi Hen,
the Commons Validator package sounds interesting and I perhaps it should
be possible to use these validators. But I also like the CLI2 validators
for files and directories. The validators I am missing are something
like dependency-validators, e.g. specify mutually exclusive options.
G
Hi Wolfgang,
It's great that the bugfix release has driven some interest onto the
lists for improving the library. Validation sounds very useful - is it
something that you think Commons Validator would be useful for, or do
the use cases not quite match?
Brian and others... any thoughts?
CLI futu
On 8/13/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Community
> > =
> >o Agreed on committer voting rules (?)
> > 1. ask on private
> > 2. propose on private
> > 3. vote on private
> > 4. ask the prospect i
test
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
