Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
@jburwell That was default behavior for few years to allow deletion of the
template even if active VMs exist. Deletion of the template on secondary
doesn't remove the template copy on pr
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
@priyankparihar A part is still missing that will use forced option in UI
but give a user option to cancel deletion if active VMs exist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
@priyankparihar Well. API use cases can be recoded but not UI. Presently we
can delete templates in UI even with active VMs. With your changes there will
be no recourse. An easy option will be
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
@karuturi @anshul1886 Can we tweak line 278 of test_snaphsot.py from
self.services["nfs"],
to self.services["nfs2"],
and re-merge this PR so it d
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
@karuturi I agree with @nvazquez . This PR can be safely merged and then
B.O. runtime environment needs to be adjusted to define nfs2 mountpoint in
test_data.py
---
If your project is set up
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
@borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can we re-test this with B.O. ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958#discussion_r102753237
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -508,7 +507,7 @@ public String updateConfiguration(final long userId
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@rafaelweingartner Can you review latest updates from @nvazquez . Since
tests are passing this PR will be ready for merging to 4.10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@rhtyd @karuturi To fix errors in B.O in
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store we need to merge PR1961 and then
adjust test_data on B.O side to have correct mapping for nfs2 label
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
Thanks @priyankparihar . We verified in our environment that all is working
fine including UI part.
LGTM
I think this one is
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@rhtyd @borisstoyanov @DaanHoogland Can we get B.O. management server log
to check why exception is generated?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r103719599
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -3614,6 +3604,26 @@ public UserVmVO doInTransaction(TransactionStatus
status) throws
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
@borisstoyanov That would be awesome .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov Can you kick off B.O for Vmware again? Hopefully it will
pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
@rhtyd @borisstoyanov did you have a chance to add nfs2 test data in B.O. ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
Still fails but error is different now
Exception: Job failed: {jobprocstatus : 0, created :
u'2017-03-03T09:20:53+', jobresult : {errorcode : 530, errortext : u'Unable
to
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov Thanks. Can you check in B.O. what is value of global
configuration 'vmware.create.full.clone', if the same configuration is set for
the primary storage pool and if
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
LGTM
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
@abhinandanprateek I am curious if this PR will allow deploying VM with
Data disk attached?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
LGTM @nvazquez Can we test it with shared networking?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
LGTM
tag: mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
@anshul1886 I am curious if there is a way to cancel stuck vmsnapshot jobs
without restarting management server. E.g. VM deployment go to error start upon
any failure in the process.
---
If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@mike-tutkowski @karuturi @koushik-das @rafaelweingartner Please review
the fix for 4.10 blocker
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@nvazquez Should we simply replace storage_tag_view instead of switching
queries over to another view?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@nvazquez Is storage_tag_view still in use after this change that reference
old way of retrieving the tags? If not should we remove it? E.g. host tags
don't have a separate view.
---
If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can you kick off new round of tests for this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@rhtyd @borisstoyanov Can you kick off new tests for this release blocker?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r105409367
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_rootvolume_resize.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1140 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@priyankparihar I think we need to improve smoke test
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py and introduce the logic you implemented in
component test test_rootvolume_resize.py.
We would want smoke
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@mike-tutkowski Can you test this fix in your environment?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@sadhugit NFS supports root disk resize with full clones. I don't see any
restriction in the code and it actually works on Vmware no matter what kind of
underlying storage technology is use
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
@sureshanaparti I've been thinking if there is better way to re-sync all
portgroups and I couldn't come up with easy alternative. With that said if we
are copying portgroups for newly
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1253
@sureshanaparti Why don't we just remove Config for this setting and leave
default to be 8?
Your logic to handle v4.1 will take care of old installations.
As of May 2016 Vsphere 4
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
@sudhansu7 Shouldn't we update POD id upon a successful migration? If
migration fails we will have wrong POD id in the DB.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r105932339
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,7 +114,13 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
# 2. root
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@nvazquez Looks like Travis cant SSH into management server during the test
.
2017-03-17 19:26:58,672 - DEBUG - mount -t nfs
nfs:/export/automation/1/testprimary
/mnt/marvin-1b4190cb
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2017
@SudharmaJain Isn't it duplicate to PR1613 that is already merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@cloudsadhu Thanks for the changes. LGTM on the code review. @borisstoyanov
@rhtyd @DaanHoogland Can you kick off another round of test for vmware and Xen
for this PR ?
---
If your project is
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov Can you also kick off vmware test in parallel?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r108580807
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,36 +134,46 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
# 2. root
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@priyankparihar Fortunately those API are already written. As per PR1767
you can get VM details including rootdiskcontroller using listVirtualMachines
API and listTemplates.
So if we are
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
LGTM on the code review. @borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can you kick off tests for
this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov Let's re-run vmware B.O test for this PR now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
@rhtyd @karuturi This is a new improvement introduced in PR1941 that
allows volume and VM snapshots to coexist. Now, test
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot in test_vm_snapshots.py needs to be
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2043
LGTM on the code change.
@borisstoyanov @rhtyd @DaanHoogland Can we re-kick vmware test for this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@yvsubhash Please, take this up. So far this PR hasn't moved forward.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2044
@DaanHoogland Can you clarify few questions/concerns
1. This change will likely to break restoreVirtualMachine functions. At the
very least users should be able to turn off new behavior with
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2044
@DaanHoogland Thanks. But for #1 the requirement for the code changes is
that the template is deleted from cloudstack. In this condition
restoreVirtualMachines when template ID is not specified
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2044
@DaanHoogland Not for us since we still use link clones but I am sure tons
of other might be affected. Interestingly enough that with PR 1773 merged the
default behavior in API is not to allow
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-174554271
Unfortunately NFS version negotiation doesn't work properly with all
storage vendors. Some vendors e.g. Tintri require that vers=3 is supplied in
mount co
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-174746870
I believe the main reason is to provide the most of backward compatibility.
image_store_details doesn't have NFS version in existing installations so after
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-184799968
Hi committers,
Can someone perform a second review and merge it at the earliest? We would
like this to be part of 4.9?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-185256350
If requirements to use particular NFS version is known beforehand it can
be specified during the image store creation using details argument
details[0].key
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1094#issuecomment-162319994
Since you are testing L3 connectivity existing switch patch to router
shouldn't overlap an ip range used by the new subnet. Cidr #1 should work fine
. You
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1094#issuecomment-162532791
This index comes from schema-40to410.sql:
CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`nicira_nvp_router_map` (
`id` bigint unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT &#x
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1094#issuecomment-163684761
Assuming everything else is ready e.g. service controllers, transport zone,
management server, STT tunnels in-between then to create L2 gateway (page 89 of
the User
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218466672
@swill Last Travis run for this PR was a success for
test_list_ids_parameter. Which PR gives an issue?
Marvin Init Successful
=== TestName
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218480013
The issue that it couldn't find a snaphsot because it is already cleaned by
account cleanup.
+cls._cl
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-218543261
@swill PR1539 passed Jenkins and Travis. After you merge it should resolve
the issue in other PRs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/798#issuecomment-219067011
It would be nice if this is resolved. The issue still exists in 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-219154273
This doesn't seem to be related to this PR.Can you post
managment-server.log extract around the failure time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542#issuecomment-219468957
@remibergsma In some private cloud environments nested virtualization is
not a good fit so it is generally disabled. That's fine but we found that it
would be
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542#issuecomment-219473209
@remibergsma, @DaanHoogland Current global support for nested
virtualization is only vmware specific and done in VmwareGuru.
Are you proposing to move the
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-220652018
@swill Travis passed. Looks like it is ready to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593#discussion_r67618240
--- Diff: usage/conf/log4j-cloud_usage.xml.in ---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ under the License
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@jburwell If no sanity-check-last-id is present it will run Sanity on the
whole cloud_usage data set and then create a new sanity-check-last-id file. The
whole part of sanity checking related to
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
@syed. On Vmware using link cloned was a default behavior. The primary use
cases are:
- storage saving if underlying arrays don't support deduplication
- speed of the deployme
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
@syed. The default behavior won't change. The proposed enhancement will add
an ability to control link/full clone deployment of a primary storage level. If
it is not defined there a cu
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
@syed. Absolutely it can although the effort seems to be well beyond and
scope of this PR. @nvazquez and I have only access to vmware hypervisors at
this point. If there is an interest to expand
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Ping for second review -- @GabrielBrascher, @rhtyd, @wido,
@rafaelweingartner
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
Ping for review -- @sateesh-chodapuneedi, @rhtyd, @koushik-das
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@rafaelweingartner That's correct. At this point advanced VM details and
advanced template details have no UI exposure. At some point we can bring in PR
to show this in UI and allow API
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@jburwell Are there any outstanding issues with this PR? It is waiting for
second LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@rafaelweingartner @swill Will you be able to review this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
@jburwell Are there any outstanding issues with this PR? It is waiting for
second LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@karuturi @jburwell There are 2 LGTM in this PR. Packaging, Travis and
Jenkins all passed. Can this be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
@rafaelweingartner @jburwell @rhtyd @koushik-das Can you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@jburwell @rhtyd @koushik-das Can you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@jburwell LGTM for the test part. This PR was extensively tested on
Environment: RHEL 6 management servers, Vmware ESX5.5 and 6.0 with advanced
networking
---
If your project is set up for
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@jburwell Support for NFS version for Secondary storage is already merged
via PR 1361. Since there were integration tests developed and executed over
there we seem to be needed tests only for
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
Debian returns: 1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
CentOs returns: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 4ms
Between those 2 we could be
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/db854a35790c77099e9f82a4e2dd77edd5be3eed#commitcomment-18732552
Don't you need to put a space in from of 0 to exclude e.g 100% packet loss ?
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605#discussion_r75796954
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -2042,49 +2043,46 @@ protected void
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@jburwell The support for passing vGPU parameters is already implemented
via PR1310 which has a test case. This PR is only performance optimization by
reducing an extra reconfgtask which save
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1650
We tried macchinina template during test cases on ESX with E1000 adapter
and VMs doesn't come with eth0 causing test_internal_lb.py and test_vpc_vpn.py
to fail on a real hypervisor test
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@rhtyd Confirming. No issues on usage and management servers.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
LGTM for the test.
Exception in network_acl_test **before the fix**
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 cloudstack]# cat /tmp//MarvinLogs//NB313W/results.txt
Test network ACL lists and items in VPC
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
Also we wrote a tester for SshHelper.sshExecute method. It was returning
output of SSHexecute command as it gets received by sshExecute. Here they are
100 sequential runs (success if result is
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
LGTM for testing. Vmware ESX 5.5 and 6.0 hypervisors, advanced networking,
RHEL 6 management servers
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 ~]# cat
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_volumes_930LZ3/results.txt|grep
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
LGTM with smoke testing. RHEL 6 management servers, advanced networking,
Vmware 5.5 .and 6 hypervisors
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 smoke]# cat
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_volumes_340FH1
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
LGTM for testing
Before
sshClient: DEBUG: {Cmd: ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 via Host: 10.140.12.103}
{returns: [u'PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.', u'64 bytes from
8.
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
@jburwell With this PR test_network_acl is successfull
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 Aug_23_2016_16_49_32_8HYYKG]# tail results.txt
Test network ACL lists and items in VPC ... === TestName
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
@rhtyd @jburwell Can this be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@rhtyd @jburwell Can this be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
@rhtyd @jburwell Can this be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
