Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael! I see I was the reporter for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164 I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is. On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: Hi folks, I have been reviewing old J

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

this Mike. The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164>) I managed to check, and I believe it can be closed. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael! >

Re: Save The Date: Spring Meetup Of Cloudstack European User Group

I’m looking forward to attending. Thanks for host this, Interoute! On 2/27/17, 5:54 AM, "Steve Roles" wrote: Hi guys, The next meetup is Wednesday, April 12, hosted by Interoute Prague. As always, there will be some great speakers, the chance to meet and collaborate with other Clo

Re: Introducing Vishwas

Welcome to the CloudStack Community! :) > On Feb 24, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Nathan Johnson wrote: > > Vishwas Pathak wrote: > >> Hello CloudStack team, >> >> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform >> testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I see the following exception when trying to deploy a user VM in a Basic Zone with two XenServer 6.5 hosts in one cluster. My system VMs have all deployed properly. The user template gets downloaded fine. I can see the user VM begin to start on a XenServer host, then it goes away. We then automa

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

off of a slightly older version of master and it works fine here. > On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Hi Mike, > Try vm with at least 512MB for memory. > >> On Mar 1, 2017 15:01, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: >> >> I see the followin

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

because I have another branch based off of a slightly older version of master and it works fine here. > On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Hi Mike, > Try vm with at least 512MB for memory. > >> On Mar 1, 2017 1

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

the 4.10 systemvmtemplate before upgrade and post-upgrade the upgrade paths fix the entries, global setting etc. Regards. ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 02 March 2017 22:39:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: :[VOTE]

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

l/1983 <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1983>With above fix, the aim is that users only seed the 4.10 systemvmtemplate before upgrade and post-upgrade the upgrade paths fix the entries, global setting etc. Regards. _______

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I believe this is another blocker, but probably related to CLOUDSTACK-9822 (which I just opened): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9823 On 3/6/17, 11:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I seem to have found another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/j

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

No VM snapshot. I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy > wrote: > > Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > > On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski,

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

rt a new thread. > It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 suffix in > DB. > I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is created. Was > snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped? > > > On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, &qu

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

ticket for this. I want to examine it a bit more before doing so. On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: No VM snapshot. I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

This does seem messed up. If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag ends up in storage_pool_details. If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them in storage_pool_tags. On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I believe I

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Yes, I can open a ticket. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy > wrote: > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can you take a > look? > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > >This does seem mess

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

> Yes in schema492to410 existing tags are imported into the table > > INSERT INTO `cloud`.`storage_pool_tags` (pool_id, tag) SELECT pool_id, > name FROM `cloud`.`storage_pool_details` WHERE value = 'true'; > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:39 PM, "Tutkowski, M

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I believe the VM was deployed that way. I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots are involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from scratch. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levi

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Here’s the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Yes, I can open a ticket. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy wrote: > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for t

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

operations. On 3/7/17, 10:11 PM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" wrote: Hi Mike, Is there any volume snapshot operation in progress for that ROOT volume, when resize is attempted? Regards, Sateesh On 07/03/17, 8:40 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

(it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing works out as expected. On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Hi, I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS datastore. A new

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

but I figured I would run them past you first. Thanks! > On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy > wrote: > > Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be addressed shortly > > On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > >OK, I have an update

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

ng cluster doesn’t have an intended affect. You might try unmanage your vmware cluster and re-try. I think one of the settings above can control where your router will end up. Thanks, Sergey On 3/8/17, 11:30 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

I went ahead and resolved/closed CLOUDSTACK-9822 just now. I am still investigating if CLOUDSTACK-9823 is an issue. Thanks! On 3/8/17, 2:41 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Thanks! I got the system VM up and running again on XenServer. On 3/8/17, 12:40 PM, "Sergey Lev

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

3-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that cod

Re: [Proposal] - StorageHA

Hi, Thanks for sending out this email and welcome to the CloudStack Community. :) I have a couple quick questions: First of all, let me start with something I found in our docs: Primary Storage Outage and Data Loss

Re: [Proposal] - StorageHA

Thanks for your clarification. I see now. You were referring to a networking problem where one host could not see the storage (but the storage was still up and running). On 3/13/17, 10:31 PM, "Jeromy Grimmett" wrote: I apologize for the delay on the response, let me clarify the points req

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement of midonet plugin

Disable, then delete works for me, too. On 3/14/17, 7:49 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote: I agree with Sergey and Will. Let's disable it first. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingärtner [rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Received: Tuesday, 14

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Hi, This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed and closed the ticket. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 I went t

Re: Welcoming Wido as the new ACS VP

Thanks for taking on this role over the past year, Will! You did a great job. :-) > On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > It has been a pleasure working with you as the ACS VP over the past year. > I would like to say Thank You to everyone who has supported me

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Wei Zhou and Rene Moser are now PMC members

Congratulations! > On Mar 17, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Rafael Weingärtner > wrote: > > Congratulation guys!! > You deserved it for your great contributions. > > Let’s keep the pace making ACS better every single PR ;) > >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Simon Weller wrote: >> >> Congrats Rene an

Re: Stop one of primary storage but no vm diskimg in it , All vm stoped.

Do you know if your other VMs shut down when you stopped the NFS service or when you put the primary storage into maintenance mode? Putting a primary storage in maintenance mode should only shut down VMs that have one or more disks running from that primary storage. For example, if you had your

Re: Stop one of primary storage but no vm diskimg in it , All vm stoped.

cloudstack-agent. In C storage ,only one file that for VMC1, there aren’t disk image for other vms , so it stoped all vms to be beyond comprehension. > 在 2017年3月22日，11:39，Tutkowski, Mike 写道： > > Do you know if your other VMs shut down when you stopped

Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Hi, Within CloudStack 4.10, I have two VMware 5.5 clusters (both in the same VMware datacenter). Each cluster has a shared iSCSI-based datastore. I can initiate the process of migrating a VM and its root disk from a host in one cluster to a host in another cluster. However, it fails with the f

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Also, by the way, datastore-66 (referenced in the image) is the target datastore. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 11:13 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (Clou

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Slight correction: That image on Imgur is of the VirtualMachineRelocateSpec that’s passed to the VirtualMachineMO.changeDatastore method to attempt to migrate the VM and its root disk. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 11:10 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apach

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Hi, The CloudStack API that the GUI is invoking is migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume (which is expected since I’m asking to migrate a VM from a host in one cluster to a host in another cluster). A MigrateWithStorageCommand is sent to VmwareResource, which eventually calls VirtualMachineMO.change

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

or does the source host have to be able to see the target datastore? If so, does that mean the target datastore has to be zone-wide primary storage when using VMware to make this work? On 3/23/17, 7:47 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: This looks a little suspicious to me (in Vmwa

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

get datastore, that works for morDsAtTarget, but morDsAtSource ends up being null. For some reason, we only check if morDsAtTarget is null (I’m not sure why we don’t check if morDsAtSource is null, too). On 3/23/17, 7:31 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Hi, The Cl

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

My version is 5.5 in both clusters. > On Mar 23, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi > wrote: > > >>> On 23/03/17, 7:21 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > >>> However, perhaps someone can clear this up for me: >>> With XenServer, we

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Also, in case it matters, both datastores are iSCSI based. > On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: > > My version is 5.5 in both clusters. > >> On Mar 23, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi >> wrote: >> >> >>>

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

disk 'Hard disk 1' is not accessible on the host: Unable to access file [SIOC-1] Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datastore. The source datastore and the target datastore are both using iSCSI. On 3/23/17, 11:53 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike&quo

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Slight typo: Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datastore. Should be (datastore changed to datacenter): Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datacenter. On 3/23/17, 12:31 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wro

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

mation for method RelocateVM_Task at line 1, column 110 while parsing SOAP body at line 1, column 102 while parsing SOAP envelope at line 1, column 38 while parsing HTTP request for method relocate on object of type vim.VirtualMachine at line 1, column 0 On 3/23/17, 12:33 PM, "Tutkowsk

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

looking to implement similar functionality for VMware. On 3/23/17, 2:01 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Another piece of info: I tried this same VM + storage migration using NFS for both datastores instead of iSCSI for both datastores and it failed with the same err

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

__ From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10) This is interesting: If I shut the VM down and then migrate its root disk to

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

oving from host to host and storage to storage at the same time so it seems to be a bug in migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume implementation. vSphere standard license is enough for both regular and storage vMotion. On 3/23/17, 1:21 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

o the destination > datastore. > > On 3/23/17, 1:34 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > >So, in my case, both the source and target datastores are cluster-scoped > primary storage in CloudStack (not zone wide). Would that matter? For > XenServer, that cluster-scoped conf

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

I think I should open a blocker for this for 4.10. Perhaps one of our VMware people can take a look. It sounds like it’s a critical issue. On 3/23/17, 4:48 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: OK, yeah, it does. The source host has access to the source datastore and the destin

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

I opened the following ticket for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849 On 3/23/17, 6:03 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I think I should open a blocker for this for 4.10. Perhaps one of our VMware people can take a look. It sounds like it’s a crit

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

kiy > wrote: > > Was it working before in 4.9? > > On 3/23/17, 5:03 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > >I think I should open a blocker for this for 4.10. Perhaps one of our > VMware people can take a look. It sounds like it’s a critical issue. >

Re: Remove me from mailing list[was]Re: [VOTE] Retirement of midonet plugin

Please see this page for details on removing yourself from CloudStack mailing lists: https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html On 3/29/17, 1:07 AM, "Sharad Nandwani" wrote: Please remove me from the mailing list. From: Daan Hoogland

VR Question

Hi, With 4.10 (master), I’m currently running all of my system VMs (including the VR) on XenServer. When I create a user VM on VMware, it acquires an IP address; however, when I create one on KVM, it does not. All of this is running in a single, basic zone. Thoughts on this? Thanks! Mike

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

/download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I c

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

and to present at the CloudStack Meetup in Prague hosted by Interoute). On 3/30/17, 4:28 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9? On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: This one may be a blocker (i

Re: VR Question

: "Tutkowski, Mike" Date: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 7:47 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: VR Question Hi, With 4.10 (master), I’m currently running all of my system VMs (including the VR) on XenServer. When I create a user VM on VMware, it acquires an IP addre

F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

Hi, I see the following error now when trying to compile 4.5.x code: [INFO] Compiling 12 source files to /Users/solidfire/Documents/CloudStack/CloudStack/plugins/network-elements/f5/target/classes [INFO] - [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [I

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Hi, > > I see the following error now when trying to compile 4.5.x code: > > [INFO] Compiling 12 source files to /Users/solidfire/Documents/ > CloudStack/CloudStack/plugins/network-elements/f

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-f5:jar:4.5.1 in central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) -> [Help 1] I removed the F5 reference there and am re-compiling. On 4/4/17, 2:14 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I am running with Java 8 because I typically have been working with

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

but would not work with anything higher. Did you try using Java JDK 7? On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > I am running with Java 8 because I typically have been working with 4.10. > I just needed to go back to 4.5.x for another projec

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

oudstack-nonoss and > while building ACS 4.5.x use JDK1.7. > > > Regards. > > ____ > From: Tutkowski, Mike > Sent: 05 April 2017 01:36:48 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x > > Hi, > > I

Re: VR Question

s once to see any security group rules got failed. > 2. Check the VR /etc/dhcphosts.txt entry for the vm is configured > 3. tcpdump on VR interface to see whether the dhcp request reached to VR. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > >> On Apr 2, 2017, at 12:34 AM, Tutkowski, Mike >>

Re: Github messages on dev list

I don’t know…I like waking up to about 200 e-mails that I need to delete. ;) On 4/28/17, 7:52 AM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: I personally prefer the way it worked before, where Github username was shown in From field and not in Subject. That way mails could be grouped by PR 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one have passed. The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for man

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

} else { +s_logger.debug("Volume " + vol.getUuid() + " is already destroyed"); + } On 5/10/17, 8:17 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

code in the next RC for 4.10. Thanks! Mike On 5/10/17, 2:34 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: OK, here’s the gist of the problem: In StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean), the following line in 4.9 List vols = _volsDao.listVolumesToBeDestroye

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi, I went ahead and opened the following PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2096 Talk to you later! Mike On May 10, 2017, at 9:26 PM, Tutkowski, Mike mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: Hi, I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this way: https://gith

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

other additions? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one have passed.

Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning

This sounds like a good idea to me. > On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > +1. I like it. > >> On Jun 4, 2017 5:04 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this >> has a really inconsistent API naming. E.g. >> >

Re: Volume snapshot and primary storage space

“A friend answered me: the last snapshot is required to take any future snapshots, that is the reason it stays on primary store” That answer is correct as far as I know. If you take another volume snapshot, we only want to transfer the data since the prior volume snapshot. To do this, we need to

Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning

Yeah, I think the phrase is that CloudStack’s API uses “conditional parameters.” As Syed notes, based on the presence of, say, parameter X, it may be required that parameters Y and Z are also passed in. On 6/6/17, 9:44 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: The interesting thing about Cloudstack's API is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi Rajani, I don’t see the following PR in this RC: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098 I ran all of my managed-storage regression tests. They all passed with the exception of the one that led to PR 2098. As I examine the RC in a bit more detail, it sits on top of ed2f573, but I th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

reating RC4 now and cancelling this. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi Rajani, I don’t see the following PR in this RC: https://github.com/apache/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

your efforts on this, everyone! Mike On 6/9/17, 8:52 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Hi Rajani, I will see if I can get all of my managed-storage testing (both automated and manual) done today. If not, we’ll need to see if someone else can complete it before we OK this RC as

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

this is the only commit added to it since the current RC. Thanks! Mike On 6/9/17, 7:43 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Hi everyone, I found a critical issue that was introduced into this RC since the most recent RC, so I am -1 on this RC. The fix for this ticket

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

On 6/12/17, 2:40 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Op 10 juni 2017 om 21:18 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike" : > > > Hi, > > I opened a PR against the most recent RC: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141 > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

> > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I had a little time this evening and re-ran some VMware-related

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

+1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests against the prior RC. The results can be located here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141. As noted in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2150, I submitted fixes to resolve two issues I had discovered.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

I should also point out that I performed my tests on a fresh system (I did not upgrade from a prior system). On 6/20/17, 9:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: +1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests against the prior RC. The results can

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

+1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated and manual testing that I performed on a previous RC. On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Hi All, I've created 4.10.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

hs in the RC phase :( > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I had a little time this ev

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

ng new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not making the >> product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see here. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Paul Angus >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos P

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

w features AND all the > new fixes in. > > People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not > making the > product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see > here. > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

works On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: +1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated and manual testing that I performed on a prev

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous one and my positive vote remains. > On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

event like CloudStack Day and/or meetups in partnership >>> with Universities. >>> >>> Sorry for the long delay on that. We tried until the last minute to turn >>> it possible and we are very sad because we cannot perform the CCC here. &

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

tform.accelerite.com/ > > On July 3, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > +1 > > I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous > one and my positive vote remains. > > On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Rajani Karuturi

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

Hi Ilya, I think this is a good idea and thanks for the proposed breakdown of the contents of the call. One thing to note about August 17 is that there is a CloudStack Meetup in London on that day. The call would be happening around 5 PM local time (during part of the meetup or during the afte

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

I thought about that, but sometimes you can barely hear the person next to you there let alone on a phone. :-) > On Jul 19, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > > ...unless you take a conference phone to the pub 😉 > > > > > ____

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

How's about a week before or after August 17? Same time. > On Jul 19, 2017, at 3:26 PM, ilya wrote: > > The date conflict is noted - please provide range of alternative dates. > > Thanks, > ilya > >> On 7/19/17 12:35 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: >> I tho

Marvin Install Issue

Hi everyone, I am having trouble installing Marvin on Ubuntu 14.04 from master. It’s complaining that it’s having trouble with mysql-connector-python. mtutkowski@mike-ubuntu:~/cloudstack/cloudstack$ sudo pip install --upgrade tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-*.tar.gz Unpacking ./tools/marvin/dist/Marvi

Re: Marvin Install Issue

t;> import mysql.connector as msc >>>> msc.__version__ > ‘2.1.3' > > Thanks, > Jayapal > > On Jul 27, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am having trouble installi

Re: Marvin Install Issue

nose-timer > > working fine. > >> On 27/07/17 05:16, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am having trouble installing Marvin on Ubuntu 14.04 from master. >> >> It’s complaining that it’s having trouble with mysql-connector-python. >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

Hi Syed, I have a couple questions. What about the minimum number of IOPS a storage provider can support? For example, with SolidFire, in some releases we can go down as low as 100 IOPS per volume and in newer releases as low as 50 IOPS per volume. Perhaps you should just leave it to the stora

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

ht, the existing offerings will still work as expected. An IOPS/GB setting will be used independently of the current method (fixed or custom) Thanks, -Syed On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tutkowski, Mike mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: Hi Syed, I have a couple questions. What about

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

m. I am not using a fifth parameter since it is an either or situation, if you pass IOPS/GB in your API call and also pass an IOPS value, I will error out saying that you can only use one of those. Thanks, -Syed On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Tutkowski, Mike mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com&

VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

Hi, I’m running some tests on master with VMware 5.5 in a Basic Zone. My SS and CP VMs come up fine, but the VR is stuck in the Starting state (even when I manually reboot the VM hosting the VR). Anyone have thoughts on this based on the cloud.log from the VR VM: Wed Aug 2 04:04:14 UTC 2017 E

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

I knew this issue sounded familiar. :) I logged a bug for it a couple years ago: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 From: "Tutkowski, Mike" Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: VMware VR stuck in Starting

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

However, the workaround that Paul Angus noted in the ticket worked for me just fine. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 4:26 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch) I knew this issue so

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

Well…it did work. However, I tried it again and am having trouble getting it to reconnect using that manual method. On 8/2/17, 4:28 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: However, the workaround that Paul Angus noted in the ticket worked for me just fine. From: "Tutkowski,

  1   2   3   4   5   >