Are you using the new systemvm image?
On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Since upgrading, and restarting system VM's, nothing is coming back online.
> System VM's are still in starting state, nothing in the way of error messages
> in the logs. Did you or anyone else encounter
Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
Xenserver :
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
KVM :
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
VMware : http://download.cloud.com/templates
Hey Marcus,
The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going
through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff
to get them corrected as soon as possible.
Travis
On Wednesday, October 2, 2013, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> For 4.2 that doesn't work.
Here is a patch for the "Deployment Architecture Overview" section until things
get setup in Review Board for the new repo or there's a GitHub mirror that pull
requests can be sent to for review. Will the github mirror and PR route be
supported in tandem with the Review Board process or not at a
gt; On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:10:26PM -0400, Travis Graham wrote:
>> Here is a patch for the "Deployment Architecture Overview" section
>> until things get setup in Review Board for the new repo or there's a
>> GitHub mirror that pull requests can be sent to fo
Was that a limitation caused by the primary storage only being available to a
single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides?
Travis
On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we
> still constrained to migrat
From the perspective of a new community member being able to contribute to a
separate repo that doesn't touch the app code is nice because that would open
up the possibility of being a committer for the doc repo and separate that silo
of work. Also less volatile in the fact that people, like me,
Here is the relevant section from the 4.2.0 docs:
*
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/add-password-management-to-templates.html
Travis
On Oct 5, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to recall how to setup a templ
CSP was included in XS 6.1 forward so there's no need to install it.
Travis
On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:58 AM, benoit lair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading the docs of ACS 4.2, and about Xenserver CSP (ch 8.2.7 :
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/c
I don't think we need to add another tool for this. I'm sure Jira is fully
capable of doing what's needed, it's just finding the right configuration and
the person who knows how to get things setup to work.
Travis
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
> +1 I think we need another
Yep, that's a typo. Should be 16059 like libvirtd.conf has by default.
If you'll open a Jira for it I'll submit a patch the docs.
Travis
On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see the KVM install guide says:
>
> tcp_port = "16059"
>
>
> I'm wondering if this is corre
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>> I have some other KVM docs that I've been updating as
>> I do my development
>>
Might be this one:
*
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
Travis
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address.
>
> SSVM can ping CS MS.
>
> I think we had a nice debug d
Have the 4.2 branch changes been merged into master now?
Which branch should we be submitting patches off of?
Travis
On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy wrote:
>> Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
>> publican changes. Can someone take a look and fix the pub
Animesh,
I'm volunteering to help out with the docs. I've put a hold on fixing things
until there's a Review Board in place for cloudstack-docs to make it easier to
submit patches.
Travis
On Oct 11, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Folks
>
> As per the thread [1] release mana
Here is a list of Jira issues against the docs that can be reviewed and closed
if the outcome is acceptable:
CLOUDSTACK-4844 -- Corrected download link for MSI file, removed MSI link from
Linux section
CLOUDSTACK-4805 -- Added the missing Ubuntu steps
CLOUDSTACK-4782 -- Already corrected in 4.2.
Another patch:
CLOUDSTACK-4609 -- Updates Pod and Cluster references in CS hierarchy
Travis
This fixes the typo referenced in CLOUDSTACK-4161.
Travis
ied.
Until the patch makes its way in I'll leave the tickets open.
I'm going through the open docs issues now and closing out the ones that are no
longer a problem.
Travis
On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:03 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:43:33PM -0400, Travi
,
Travis Graham
---
(section 4.5.7.2) reflect steps for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
Diffs
-
en-US/nfs-shares-on-management-server.xml 881ca8d
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14784/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
---
Corrects the two references in Release Notes.
Diffs
-
release-notes/en-US/Release_Notes.xml a65cca9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14785/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
---
(sections 2.3 and 2.4) Updated references to organization unit within
CloudStack for Pods and Clusters
Diffs
-
en-US/about-clusters.xml d2f0220
en-US/about-pods.xml 57ae1a3
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14786/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
Here was the last from the thread you're thinking of, no resolution follow up,
so I don't know if it fixed things previously:
Hi Min,
1/ I just pulled the latest code from master and used marvin, it went fine.
Are you still facing this issue? Make sure your local setup is clean and marvin
i
/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
Brockmeier.
Repository: cloudstack-docs
Description
---
Corrects the two references in Release Notes.
Diffs
-
release-notes/en-US/Release_Notes.xml a65cca9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14785/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
Brockmeier.
Repository: cloudstack-docs
Description
---
(section 4.5.7.2) reflect steps for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
Diffs
-
en-US/nfs-shares-on-management-server.xml 881ca8d
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14784/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
://reviews.apache.org/r/14783/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Travis Graham
created
against 4.2.
- Travis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14784/#review28433
---
On Nov. 7, 2013
I'm kicking off the thread to discuss the work that's needed for the 4.2.1
Release Notes.
Radhika has asked for help getting the 4.2.1 RN updated and Alok and I have
volunteered so far to help out. Sebastian has asked to hold off on the release
until after the Amsterdam meet up which would prov
I think that's an acceptable middle ground. I would prefer to have the
artifacts to test the upgrade procedures with and with a designated committer
to review, commit and release the docs as progress is made we should all be
able to call this approach a win.
I've yet to get any kind of environm
I agree on splitting the docs out into their own repo that pull requests can be
sent to as bugs in the docs are found or different installations are tested and
documented.
With the current state of the docs being one of the greatest barriers to entry
for new CloudStackers, or even when running
That is weird, do you have entries for them in the console_proxy and
secondary_storage_vm tables?
Have you tried to destroy them and let the Management server recreate them to
see if that creates the entry in the hosts table?
Travis
On Sep 4, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> So I'm
Is there a problem with applying the sql changes as micro timestamped updates
and keeping a schema version in the db based on the timestamp?
In Ruby on Rails that's how migrations are created, as timestamped ruby file
that defines the changes, for example 20130818033029_add_user_roles.rb. When a
Will this only pull down one key pair or can it pull down many? We have a need
to pull in our keys as well as all of our customers keys.
If the script can only pull down one, we can make it work, but would be nice to
pull down all keys from the project an instance is associated with.
Travis
On
MariaDB is a drop in replacement for MySQL, so it can be used with or without
the JOOQ changes.
Travis
On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be a lot of work to move to JOOQ? All queries will have to be
Use the links from the Install Guide instead.
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template
Travis
On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> In trying to troubleshoot I think I hav
Have you tried backing out each commit until it builds clean to see what
broke things?
Travis
On Thursday, November 28, 2013, sebgoa wrote:
> moved to dev@
>
> I have been checking on this, and the release notes don't build, there is
> some freaking weird error with publican :(
> Staring at it a
38 matches
Mail list logo
