I agree with the respin.
Cloudstack is still a young open source project and we don't need any
negative press/tweets/blogs/gossip :)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailt
I am a fan of Foundation's look (or Bootstrap even)...
http://foundation.zurb.com/
3d elements make it look dated, kind of like it does now. The less images,
the better imo.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage <
kel...@backbonetechnology.com> wrote:
> Hmm, maybe cut 2 copi
If you could use font icons, that would be really nice..
(MIT License)
http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icons/
(Apache License)
http://getbootstrap.com/components/#glyphicons
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Brian Federle wrote:
> Right now the plan was to remove the icons, though if
I tend to agree. This is an Release Candidate, not an actual Release.
However, I am not so sure going forward that there should be a pure time
based release unless the their is a way to not plow through the release
dates. Perhaps having code freezes earlier in the cycle would help.
On Wed, Aug 2
Kudos to you Sebastian!
I am glad to see it in Markdown.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > > By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
> > yes you can...
> >
> > http://daringf
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> [Animesh>] Any change should be done post 4.2
>
I agree, this should be post 4.2.
I really like markdown, very readable in the state that it is in before it
is converted to whatever else. I also like reStructuredText.
Outputting to different formats is important I guess, however, I would say
that most real reading that is done is done in html.
With that said, I love beautiful
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this has been discussed a few times on the list before.
>
> When I start up the CSMS, I get prompted for my password about nine times.
>
> I thought updating the sudoers file would fix this, but it still happens.
>
> Any thou
M, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> > You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
> >
>
> bad idea, someone compromises your account and he is root.
>
> > Kelven
> >
> > On 9/4/13 4:10 PM, "Tracy Phillips" wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:05 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> > You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
> >
>
> bad idea, someone compromises your account and he is root.
>
>
>
True. But they are on your box unauthorized, its just a matter of time
be
+1 to Marty.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Marty Sweet wrote:
> My view is that when a feature is added the developer should give a short
> overview of how to use all of the items which have been added, a doc
> contributor can then write this up in a user friendly manner which is
> similar to
Matt,
Probably the contact listed in the whois
Domain ID:D150572512-LROR
Domain Name:CLOUDSTACK.ORG
Created On:07-Jan-2008 15:12:00 UTC
Last Updated On:12-Sep-2013 11:24:54 UTC
Expiration Date:07-Jan-2018 15:12:00 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Domain.com, LLC (R1915-LROR)
Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
St
+1 to Daan.
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> -1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features
> in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then
> to pack more bugs in a single go.
&
Rafael,
Once you put XCP on, do you gain features that belong to Xenserver or is it
limited in someway?
The only reason I am not using Xenserver is that I have to manage it
differently than my other hosts.
Tracy
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Rafael
Very, very nice. I watched your videos a month or so ago.
Good work!
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Antone Heyward
wrote:
> I wanted to get some feedback on this as I have added it github. Hopefully
> it helps some get into using apache cloudstack and ma
Thanks for the update. This is good news.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:53 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last
> month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make
git-flow with master always golden would be a good method.
Right now the development model just isn't working.
fwiw, I am not a developer, just a tinkerer with git and some bash and a
lurker :)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yep...what
The best thread I have read in awhile...
Good read http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leo Simons
> wrote:
> > lsimons
>
>
> has access
>
> --
> Daan
>
24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Tracy Phillips
> wrote:
> > Good read
> http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
>
>
> he agrees with our thread that every work sould start with creating a
> branch, doesn't he. I think we need to say that a lot of times
daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 July 2014 17:30
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Tracy Phillips
> wrote:
> > Good read
> > http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
>
>
"Once you merge release branch it on master/stable branch, you don’t lose
commit if you delete it. It’s like removing a feature branch once it’s
merged on master/target branch."
Correct. At t his point your "release" is in master. If you need to bug
fix, you checkout that tag from master.
Also, a
Alena,
Check this out and see if it would resolve your concern regarding
maintaining multiple releases
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16562339/git-flow-and-master-with-multiple-parallel-release-branches
git-flow uses support branches to support releases that are not on master.
On Wed, A
Any process is better than what is being used right now.
git-flow is just a proven process that is working for folks who use it.
That is a fact.
git-flow somewhat enforces a process, especially if you use the git-flow
plugin:
git flow feature start 2345-eye-candy
git flow feature publish etc, e
23 matches
Mail list logo
