RE: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-19 Thread Ramanath Katru
Can we get the CI proposed by Bharat up onto the ASF servers? While may not be complete or even if its running with issues, why not start it over there and have everyone fix it to get it up and running? Ram Katru -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday

RE: Revisit Process for creating Blocker bugs

2015-08-04 Thread Ramanath Katru
While we can say if a bug doesn’t effect "majority" of current users, we can go ahead and release, but we should also look at a product perspective not just release perspective. There are some features that are important for cloudstack as a product and these cannot be broken in a release. If we

RE: Revisit Process for creating Blocker bugs

2015-08-04 Thread Ramanath Katru
different things. Daan On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Ramanath Katru wrote: > While we can say if a bug doesn’t effect "majority" of current users, we can > go ahead and release, but we should also look at a product perspective not > just release perspective. There are som

RE: Revisit Process for creating Blocker bugs

2015-08-04 Thread Ramanath Katru
Subject: Re: Revisit Process for creating Blocker bugs Yes we can if there is a group of users that don't use it but are in dire need far another feature. We just have to document and market it properly On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ramanath Katru wrote: > Daan, > > I beg to differ

RE: VR refactoring, concerns and a way out ?

2015-09-24 Thread Ramanath Katru
My vote is for the approach no.1 - to backout completely. Most of VR functionalities are broken and are in a mess to say the least. It definitely will take some time and effort from several folks to get it to a stable state. Ram Katru -Original Message- From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.