Hi all,
As you know, tomorrow is the first day of the Apache CloudStack Collab 2016
Montreal. We will be starting with a round-table session around 1:30 pm EDT
(GMT -4).
You are all invited to join us via GoToMeeting [1] and contribute to the
list of topics you would like to see discussed [2].
M
Hi,
>From the #jenkins slack channel discussion this morning we kind a took a
quick action on getting our hands on domain registration for
apachecloudstack{.org,.net}
So, we also did some DNS updated until we have help from INFRA to use
cloudstack.org which to me make more sense.
So we added fe
nice idea Erik, it worth asking infra about this...
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> >
> > > Op 9 juni 2016 om 15:21 schreef Pierre-Luc Dion :
> > >
> > >
> > >
Hi Ron,
As far as I know, ICLA and CCLA is required for commiters, but not required
for non-commiters contributors. I don't know about all details, someone
else in the ML might have more details about this. For sure, you can be a
contributor without submitting code as a anyone in this ML is consid
I'm working on the release note, so I've installed rpm's from apt-get.eu;
the managemnt server was not able to start because of a missing column
(account.role_id), I'm not seing an alter tables for this column
in setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql but the creation of the table role is
there.
I did a
loyed database with a fresh install and it worked as well.
>
> Can you share details/steps on how to reproduce your issues? Or, can you
> try with a fresh install or a new upgrade test?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
> Sent:
look like I got it to work from 4.7.1 was probably my environment that was
broken...
thanks,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
wrote:
> I will retry an upgrade from 4.7.1 will see how it goes... a fresh
> install of 4.9.0 work fine.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at
Hi,
>From what I'm seeing we need to upgrade the MySQL connector for Python with
4.9.0 on CentOS.
Here is the suggested path, tested on CentOS6 [1]. This snipped will be
part of the upgrade and install instructions. Also, look like these steps
are not required on Ubuntu 14.04, did any one can con
ot a CloudStack packaging issue, that's how dpkg and apt work.
>
> Wido
>
> > ~ Rajani
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On August 9, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
> > wrote:
> > Op 8 augustus 2016 om 22:29 schr
We are also keeping an eye on the remote management VPN. Last time I've
tested the StrongSwan PR, it was not working for the remote MGT vpn,
site-to-site was working.
Look like some config would be missing in strongswan configuration. I'm
willing to test/provide configuration needed in strongswa
onfigs necessary to make that switch.
> Once there, we see how NAT behaves and deal with the issues that arise.
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthew Smart
> President
> Smart Software Solutions Inc.
> 108 S Pierre St.
> Pierre, SD 57501
>
> Phone: (605) 280-0383
>
To me, if we would like to offer LTS, we need to fix following core issues:
- how database version is handle, right now database structure is mixed
with upgrade*.sql files and some java code
- better test upgrade path, I'm not sure we test them properly :-S
I have to admit I'm not fan of LTS re
Hi,
I've observed on few system we've upgrade over the last months that they
don't have the same amount of global settings has opose to a fresh install
of cloudstack.
I have 3 scenarios
4.4.x to 4.7.x (484)
4.4.x to 4.7.x to 4.9.0 (494)
4.2.1 to 4.6.0 to 4.7.0 to 4.9.0 (499)
4.7.x (398)
in a
oceed with this but basically any upgraded
CloudStack have 15 missing Global Settings.
It's easy to replicate event with jetty.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've observed on few system we've upgrade over the last months that they
Hi John,
I would like to rise the following issue recently found that I think
affect any update past 4.6.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9489
I think it should be relatively easy to fix but I'm scared about the impact
of overriding costumized value. I'm testing this these days..
al settings, we can migrate them to use ConfigKey so
> they get created during upgrade/db-migration.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
> Sent: 02 September 2016 21:28:02
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrade
Hi,
we now have a nice URL pointing to the replacement jenkins of j.bac.o:
builds.cloudstack.org
I'll make sure the enable SSL for user authentication, whoever is commiter
that want admin access to Jenkins, let me know, if you have CI system that
we could leverage via a centralized portal, feel
Hi Jeroen,
You should need at least 1Gb but I don t think it provide a warning if you
don't have enough space.
On Sep 20, 2016 07:33, "Wei ZHOU" wrote:
> 2 GB ?
>
> 2016-09-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jeroen Baten :
>
> > Could it be that in /usr/share/cloudstack-common/
> > scripts/storage/secondary/
I'm not sure how it would help to containerized VR services, but it would
certainly help on maintaining them.
I really like the idea of using a configuration management tool on the VR
that would be responsible to maintain the VR at the expected state by
CloudStack.
At the moment on our side we ar
Hi Rohit,
Like it! Our VR system is due for some rethinking!
I don't have much points to add to issues you highlight, it seems pretty
complete.
Here are some more features or ideas that would be interesting to see in a
new VR system:
- Use or support for routing protocol, such as BGP or OSBP so
ues).
>
> Lastly, we already have this PR which aims to do automatic
> systemvmtemplate registeration/installation/seeding and handle upgrades
> (targetted for 4.16): https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4329 The
> PR also unifies the systemvm template use to be extended for CKS
p-api) however
> that is probably not supported for their lts/legacy release, we'll also
> face issue with installing/configuring custom packages (java etc) that we
> need for systemvm/VR.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
>
Hello,
I've just found that we have a go library for cloudstack [1],
I'm curious to know if we are using this lib in cloudmonkey and our
terraform driver?
Is it considered as a stable lib ?
Cheers,
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go
I've messing around with cloudstack-go
Did a fix that rohit merged yesturday for hostsservices, but this fix will
only work for acs4.15, I'd like to fix it for previous acs version too, but
look like the version of the SDK depend on acs version;
Example; for the hostservices, the host attribute m
+1 : marving ports to python3
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:37 AM Gabriel Bräscher
wrote:
> +1 Sounds good to me.
>
> I would propose someone organizing the hackathon by raising the topics and
> adding at a Kanban during the Hackathon, then we can split into teams if
> there are too many tasks/atte
fix some failing
> component tests. test frameworks and such is a good subject though!
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 4:09 PM Pierre-Luc Dion
> wrote:
>
> > +1 : marving ports to python3
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:37 AM Gabriel Bräscher
> > wrote
I like the notion of LTS every 2 years and having 1 or 2 regular releases
per year, like the Ubuntu model.
Typically, upgrading our cloud from a major release is a big level of
effort, especially around QA to make sure the upgrade does not affect
customers.
So, having to jump between LTS every ye
We've been looking at something similar on our side where we would have
installed telegraf on the VR template and telegraf would have been sending
data to a port forwarding on the hypervisor host.
I don't know how we could have the VR exposting Prometheus data securely;
outside of the customer net
86611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE)
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until October 1st, 2021.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Pearl Dsilva
>
>
>
>
--
*Pierre-Luc Dion*Lead Cloud Architect | Architecte infonuagique principal
t 888.796.8364 ext. 1403
c 514.880.7765
[image: LOGO-CloudDotCa-RGB (1) (1).png]
these projects will also validate/test the go-sdk).
>
> Unless there are any objections, do we agree to tag the cloudstack-go repo
> with tags against ACS releases using the approach PL started?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> *Fro
Good Initiative Rajsekhar !
I think this document should go into the admin-guide [1]. For sure the wiki
is easier to start with :-)
Thanks !
PL
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Rajsekhar K
wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> Thanks for your responses. I am sure we will be able to create a complete
> refer
When you have this issue, if you setup a Portforwarding for ssh for the VM,
does the PF rule work?
We observed similar issue where VR does not apply or receive configs pushed
by the management-server. I haven't really start investigate that but
wondering if you have similar issue. and usually a re
Will, ill take care of that server, but can you confirm the jenkins master
is not having disk full too?
Hi Rohit,
I can't recall where that version specific come from for ACS 4.5 with
VMware, I think it was from the CloudPlatform 4.5 release notes.
I never really tested ACS with VMware so I cannot really comment on which
version is required.
Anyone else would have an idea?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 4,
already existing VM?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Nux! wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> Hi,
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> I am yet to restart the VR, will do thi
We have a system currently running 4.7.0 which is connected to an
Active-Directory thru LDAP and we had no issues so far.
it got upgraded from: 4.2.1 to 4.6.0 to 4.7.0
Ilya, does your issues could be related to LDAP changes required from an
upgrade:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloud
Hi guys, we've been quiet lately, but we want to organize a collab event in
Canada, our target dates are June 2 and 3. We just cleared some
questionning regarding the planning and now ready to go forward.
Could an european one be postpone?
Il start a new thread in the mailing list...
On Mar 16, 2
CloudOps is hosting a Apache CloudStack conference event from June
1-3, 2016 with
developers and users to regroup and evolve the software and its
functionality. It has been a while since our wider community has gotten
together to collaborate and learn, and our aim is to get everyone together
over a
Hi,
Since we are going ahead with a CCCNA16 in Montreal, we would like to
revive the website http://cloudstackcollab.org/. The url is curently
pointing to linuxfoundation events site but our event and the one in
SaoPaolo on September will not use linuxfoundation services :-S
So we were thinking
Hi,
Sorry to step in late on that thread. I have a question for Jim, David,
Sam.
As it seams, a lot of us in the "CloudStack community" would love to work
with github features to speedup the project development cycle, The fact
that some other ASF projects are interested too. Would it be thinkabl
All,
We are pleased to announce that the registration for the CloudStack
Collaboration Conference North America 2016 is open. We would like to
invite you all to Montreal, Canada on June 2 and 3 to participate in this
conference. Registrations are now available, so head over to the evenbrite (
http
rm a round table about all things
going on in CloudStack, it is a TBD but also open to suggestion. Happy hour
might happen too.
Regards,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> All,
>
> We are pleased to announce that the registration for the CloudStack
> Collabor
2016 at 3:15 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Minor clarification,
>
> Has you will see on the event site, it's from June 1st to 3rd. Since we
> are expecting people traveling on June 1st we were planning to startup the
> event on the Wednesday (June 1st) late afternoon. It&
Hi,
I've "released" in Jira our version that got released over the last few
months, so now the only unreleased versions are: 4.9.0, 4.8.1, 4.7.2.
I've archived release that I don't think we will release: 4.4.5, 4.5.3 if
someone is planning to be RM on these we can unarchive them.
I've close some
Something that could be interesting also is to remove VR and systemVMs logs
from the cloudstack-management.log and have them into a separate files. I'm
still not sure of those logs are traps only when there is problems, if it's
the case it make sense to keep them in cloudstack-management.log.
Any
Congrats Simon!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Simon,
>
> Let’s keep up with the good work ;)
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > welcome, kiwi. Good work and keep going.
> >
> > On Thu, Ap
Thanks John for that initiative.
Good idea to start organizing teams and topics since we won't have much
time on site. As Will said the main theme would be around CI, and we are
working to get enought hardware and ressource so all teams could have their
own setup...
Cheers,
PL
On Thu, May 5, 2
Hi,
I've been trying to demystify the urban legend about available hardware
within Apache infrastructure that could be used as Continuous Integration
infrastructure for CloudStack builds.
So far the current status is that Apache have available hardware, few
servers which I don't have details.
Las
And also, I've just created: INFRA-11829
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to demystify the urban legend about available hardware
> within Apache infrastructure that could be used as Continuous Integration
> infrastruct
while waiting to have hardware available on Apache infra,
I'd like to setup a jenkins master on cloud.ca for now so we can phase out
jenkins.buildacloud.org.
I'm setting up a new jenkins server and shoud we take that oportunirty to
change the URL?
By something like builds.cloudstack.org ? clouds
+1 (binding)
Got it to work on osX-sierra.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE <
sigert.goemi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 5.3.3 release-candidate of CloudMonkey, with the following
Thanks Wido,
It's cool seeing update like this!
On Dec 20, 2016 15:48, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to give an update on my IPv6 progress since my last [0] update.
>
> The Wiki [1] still contains the most data about this, but the first PR [2]
> is already open which should
I'm looking for a way to collect metrics from VR's in a way that I would
call "aggressive" to collect CPU usage, disk, memory, network and VPN logs
in a way that I can almost have realtime data of them (every 15seconds).
My use case is to help troubleshoot network performance like haproxy and
VPNs
Hi,
It's per VPC or Guest Network, basically 8 per Virtual Router. We've
tested up to 4 on our side so far without issues.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Cloud List wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On below documentation:
>
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-
> administration/en/4
Hi Raja,
You don't need a custom setting.xml in Maven for cloudstack unless you want
to define a private maven repo such as nexus
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Raja Guru Thirumavalavan <
geeky.rajag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can some one please send me maven settings.xml for cloudstack
Hi,
In the context of deployment of CloudStack with VPCs,
What will happen to a cloud when upgrading to 4.10 that now use jdk8?
Does upgrading the management-server to 4.10 jdk8 and then keep the old VRs
run for a while that run on JDK7 will still work ?
Because If we upgrade the management-serv
t;>>> 2017-02-20 18:15 GMT+01:00 Will Stevens :
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regarding my question. Is it because of the version of Java that the
> >>>>> systemvm.iso is built on?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 20, 2017 11:58
Hi,
This is a nice idea and initiative, we have a similar project in our
backlog, we cloud help to improve this PR.
There is some issues to send logs to management-server:
* this current feature impose use of rsyslog
* support a single management server , would not work for a redundant
deploymen
Hi guys, it's been a while!
I'd like to know what would be the path to follow within the community to
submit a feature into cloudstack, but also to review our proposal on
offering a template that boots from the network.
Basic idea, is that there is some workload, specially for XenDesktop where
de
orage+%28Direct+Download%29+on+KVM
>
> https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-feature-first-look-direct-download-agnostic-of-the-storage-provider/
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2020 20:06
> T
Hi Evgeniy,
They are supported with XenServer in case it can help you.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Sven Vogel wrote:
> Not at the moment.
>
>
> __
>
> Sven Vogel
> Lead Cloud Solution Architect
>
> EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
> Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
> P +49 341 42649 - 99
> F +49 341 42649 - 98
It would be interesting if we could come up with a catalogue of api tests,
as serverspec [1] did for infrastructure tests.
if we would have some kind of library of tests, then the only things we
would define in our tests suite would be the order of
unit tests and pretty much no code.
I don't kno
1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> [1] https://markmail.org/message/mdgeahlabpbx3v22
>
>
> Regards.
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
--
*Pierre-Luc Dion*Lead Cloud Architect | Architecte infonuagique principal
t 888.796.8364 ext. 1403
c 514.880.7765
[image: LOGO-CloudDotCa-RGB (1) (1).png]
This is a very good idea ! Thanks Giles, and Rohit, for putting this
together!
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:43 AM Giles Sirett
wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> One of the biggest challenges with Cloudstack is learning its architecture
> and codebase - its big and its complicated. Onboarding new software
+1
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:06 AM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> +1 , on this new repo under Apache. Hope the community takes it forward,
> with further improvements and maintenance of this provider.
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
> On 15/04/21, 2:35 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote
Hello,
We've provided a PR for the remote management VPC to support IKEv2 using
SSL cert to auth the server and username/password for users [1].
The problem with OpenVPN is that it requires a custom client for some OSes
such as windows, compared to IKEv2; it's supported out of the box on
Windows,
Hello,
Daan, I agree we should provide capability to select the vpn solution to
use, the question would be, should it be a global setting generic for the
whole region or per VPC?
I think it should be a global setting to reduce the requirement complexity
of a region, but per VPC or customer(accoun
used would be awesome.
>
> I understand that OpenVPN is a great option and far adopted; however, I
> would be -1 if this would impact on removing support for Strongswan --
> which from what I understood is not the proposal, but saying anyway to be
> sure.
>
> Thanks for rais
btw, I like the idea of CloudStack offering OpenVPN as a solution !
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:40 AM Pierre-Luc Dion
wrote:
> Just to be sure, what CloudStack > v4.15 uses Strongswan/l2tp or
> strongswan/ikev2 ?
>
> Because l2tp became complicated to configure on native vpn
401 - 469 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
