Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot with XenServer 6.2.
Upgrade went smoothly, systemvm upgraded well
so far I've only found 2 missing label in the UI: (
label.add.isolated.guest.network, label.password.reset.confirm).
We need make sure to provide the systemvm template with the commit:
80
+1 (binding)
Did test upgrade from 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2, Management-server running
on CentOs 6.6.
The Release-notes as been updated.
PL
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot with XenServer 6.2.
>
> Upgrade went
Andrei,
I wouldn't recommend to downgrade, I did that in the past when we upgraded
to 4.2.1 and I end up with even more issues. For the maintenance mode
issue, can you verify that systemvm currently running (including VR) run as
4.4.2 ? I've saw behavior like this when upgrading to 4.4.x where
Cl
> Kind regards
>
> ----- Original Message -
>
> > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 February, 2015 2:09:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2
>
> > Andrei,
>
>
Apidocs for 4.5.0 is on the staging website, I'll do the push on the live
site once an RC will be approved.
The Release note is ready in the cloudstack-docs-rn branch 4.5, but it lack
in new features which I'm sure 4.5 does contain. so if anyone is aware of
new features that should be in the "What
4.4.3 never been released, will it? anyway, it's a blocker I guest.
did also found following issues that are not blocker and all related to UI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8232
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8188
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTA
I think I'm facing Nux issue with SSVM, Never been able to download a
template for XenServer on a NFS secondary storage.
It remain as "Installing Template" status.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
> > On 08-Feb-2015, at 11:44 pm, Nux! wrote:
> >
> > "ERROR [cloud.agent.
ww.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Sunday, 8 February, 2015 18:35:43
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3
>
> > I think I'm facing Nux issue with SSV
Geoff, as far as I know Basic Networking with Security group never worked
with XenServer + OVS, only with Bridge, please correct me if I'm wrong.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> When trying to add XenServers to a new 'Basic
Hi,
I'd like to know what SystemVM template we will use in ACS450, Jenkins'
ones or thoses from CloudPlatform 4.5.0 that are in the Release Notes of
CCP?
I think all tests made by the community have been made using latest 4.5.0
systemvm template from Jenkins, right?
Thanks,
sed Jenkins for the 4.5 system templates for my 4.5 testing.
> >
> > On Monday, February 9, 2015, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to know what SystemVM template we will use in ACS450, Jenkins'
> >> ones or thoses fr
For voting on new features why not use the voting capability of Jira for
new feature? at least it would give an idea if their is interest about new
features and improvement. test:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12330479 (logon required)
Regarding spec of new features they still ne
Congrats Wilder!
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> Excellent news, congrats Wilder!
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Paul Angus
> wrote:
>
> > Hey, Congratulations Wilder!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Paul Angus
> > Cloud Architect
> > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 |
Chip, is this mean -1 ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> RAT failed with:
>
> Unapproved licenses:
>
> framework/rest/.gitignore
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, wi
+1 (binding)
Did perform lot of tests against RC3, did upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5-RC4, no
issues so far.
If this RC pass the vote, can we do the GA from with a different commit ID
to include the license header flagged by Chip ?
PL
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Marcus wrote:
> This looks li
You can refer to Rohit's SAML feature, their is a button on the logon page
in acs4.5, it can be disabled thru GlobalSettings.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:44 PM, ilya musayev
wrote:
> I'm looking into a way of making ResetVM button disabled in some
> cloudstack environments. Ideally, i'd want it
;
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 6 March, 2015 13:29:28
> > Subject: Re: Disabl
I'd like to know who have access to cloudstack.apt-get.eu so we can upload
ACS4.5 systemvm-templates,
RC4 is going well and I'd like to update the doc so systemvm links does not
refer to jenkins system.
Thanks,
Can we release 4.5.0, and see how it could be fixed in 4.5.1 ?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Unfortunately I've been travelling and not had chance to test fully.
>
> I did manage to test last night and found this bug i
When the password is taken and acknowledge from the VR it should be
destroyed immediately from the VR and as it is currently, I think. Are you
planning to implement SSL capability as well since it as been brought on
the ML recently ?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
>
>
Hi,
I'm usually placing those types of notes in the General Upgrade Notes
(upgrade/upgrade_notes.rst), Is it make more sense to have that in the
fixed_issue? Although the 4.5 fixed_issue file is impressively large so
people might not go at the bottom of the page...
BTW thanks, that's great :-) !
Over the winter there was a Quality Improvement Initiative that was looking
at how to make contribution to CloudStack easier and improve quality of the
product. Basically it was a lot of discussion [2] about CI and how to use
GIT,...
It also look like github pull request as became quite popular, w
Just to confirm, I've ran a lot of tests against 4.5-rc3, using password
enabled templates inside VPC and it all work perfectly, including userdata
and sshkey, ssh reset, password reset,...
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> It will be all forgiven :) - if I can see real
I really like Sebastien concept of Container as workload because it could
be used into an existing cloud without introducing a new hypervisor, also,
it might be possible to reuse current networking features of cloudstack.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
> > On M
I've fixed the slave msaz-slave-01 so it can build centos7 rpms and add
the label cloudstack-buildslave-centos6 to coohq-slave-01.
coohq-slave-01 run Ubuntu 14.04 I hope it does not affect something.
some build jobs are back to green.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Ian Southam
wrote:
> Daa
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Karen Vuong to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that she have accepted.
Karen is doing a huge effort on promoting CloudStack and organizing
events such as CloudStack days, CloudStack collaboration conferences
a
That's nice! it would be triggered only when upgrade of DB occur while
upgrading a release, right? not everytime a cloudstack-management server is
restarted?
Where would you dump db files?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:10 PM, ilya wrote:
> It would be ideal if we can make this or similar script a
Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which
build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own
the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to
have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily
see 2
Tilak,
Take a look at devcloud4 from Ian Duffy[1], it use vagrant + virtualbox to
setup a nice test env locally. You might be able to run multiple instance
of the cloudstack management-server into VMs. devcloud4 does not use the
simulator as managed hypervisor, it deploy a XenServer VM, so it migh
t; > > >
> > > > Ws
> > > > On Mar 23, 2015 8:54 PM, "Tilak Raj Singh"
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > > > From: Tilak Raj Singh
> > > > > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2015
1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/
[2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> > Look like so
some addition inline:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> > I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought
> > and I'd like to have some input
I'm waking up this old thread.
I was reviewing some jenkins jobs and took a closer look at simulatorfast,
We currently have a jenkins job running every 20mins for the
simulatorfast, That seams great and seams to provide a good coverage and is
perform quite fast, although it's currently running on
member.
> You can publish your images there and delete the apachecloudstack org. I
> think it’s better to just use ‘cloudstack'
>
> > On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> > some addition inline:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM,
Rohit, by any chance , does this fix this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8231 ?
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Good work Rohit
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20
I'm wondering if I'm the only one not behing able to build RPMs from
noredis? I'm having this error:+ rm -rf
/data/lib/jenkins/workspace/CloudStack-4.4-RC_nodist_rpms/dist/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cloudstack-4.4.3-1.el6.x86_64/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/classes/vms
/var/tmp/r
.4 (latest). Please use the rpms
> that I shared, or use latest 4.4 for testing.
>
> > On 30-Mar-2015, at 9:27 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering if I'm the only one not behing able to build RPMs from
> > noredis? I'm having this
ditional build patches (no change
> to core cloudstack but only packaging).
>
> > On 31-Mar-2015, at 7:13 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> >
> > Rohit, I'm experiencing this rpmbuild issue with the RC branch, true that
> > it's working on 4.4 branch.
> > D
Hi,
I'm setting up a test env with the master branch and XenServer 6.5.0
VR are not starting I have the CPVM and SSVM running but VR failed to start
for guest network and VPC. the VR instance start and got shutdown right
after debian is booted. I've used templates from j.bac.o.
Does anyone is aw
> Can you please check the MS logs for the VR start.
> You might be getting exception for VR start due which the MS is stopping
> the router.
>
> Can you please send the management server logs.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> On 02-Apr-2015, at 12:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
Thanks for the clue, I'll update the doc for ACS 4.5. if you want to use
ACS + XS6.5 you should use CloudStack 4.5.x you can build package from the
4.5 git branch, 4.5.1 is currently in RC phase hopefully release in less
then a month.
Regards,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Keerthiraja SJ wro
For about 2 weeks we are having this build that is broken. does anyone
could have a look at it? is this cause by a recent commit ?
I'm not sure what this is and how to mitigate this...
Thanks
+1
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:58 AM Sebastien Goasguen
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy wr
d companies. If you are
>>>>>>>> not the
>>>>>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contac
ng:
> > >
> > > docker run -p 8080:8080 apachecloudstack/simulator
> >
> > so from there:
> >
> > docker exec -ti CONTAINER_ID bash
> >
> > and once in the container use Marvin to configure your zone.
> >
> >
> > >
> > &
Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J
Today during the CloudStackdays we did a round table about Release
management targeting the next 4.6 releases.
Quick bullet point discussions:
ideas to change release planning
- Plugin contribution is complicated because often a new plugin involve
change on the core:
- ex: storage
When working with multiple environments with various installation of
Cloudstack (in labs) the -SNAPSHOT tell me that it's the non released
version currently running. That's helpful once the release is GA to know
if's the the GA version in place or not.
Having the -SNAPSHOT remove the confusion ar
Here is my experience with pull request on github for documentation: as
non comiter it is very easy for a one time pull request. But, because ACS
github repo is a mirror, next PR from the same fork branch almost never
worked because initial PR add a merge commit which is not in the fork
branch. I
Rohit, I would much prefer something like Nate suggestions, at least when
working with cloudstack build from git source is easy to know using the
cloudstack version api call and rpm packages name.
Rohit, just be sure, what you are suggesting is ,as example, for branch 4.5
until 4.5.0 is GA, the v
gement/db
> >>>>> - install 4.4.1 systemvm
> >>>>> - do the manual db hotfix thing
> >>>>> - finally restart the systemvms so they use the 4.4.1 template
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does that cover it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nux!
> >>>>> www.nux.ro
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Original Message -
> >>>>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" >
> >>>>>> To: "dev" >
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2014 20:35:51
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Is the 4.4.0 template still necessary for upgrade
> 4.3.x - 4.4.1?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Nux! >
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> ual sys
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> that would be once you install the 4.4.1 templates, yes. remind me
> >>>>>> often we need to upgrade the systemvm upgrade mechs
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Daan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> > > > > Daan
>
--
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
ages/submodules and fixes pom.xml). People may
> want to tag built rpms/debs which they can do either by adding suffixes to
> those packages. We may also reintroduce having a plain text file that
> holds git commit SHA out of which a build was built and put it in some
> package like clou
I got this error when building 4.4.1 from git tag and tar file:
Results :
Failed tests:
runUploadSslCertBadkeyAlgo(org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServiceTest)
runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair(org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServiceTest)
Tests in error:
runUploadSslCertSelfSignedNoPassword
+1 (binding)
Quickly test against 4.2.1 and 4.4.1. autocompletion seams to work quite
well.
thanks !
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 5.3.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> h
Hi Daan,
could it be possible to merge hotfix/4.4-7822 and cherry-pick:
b04cc750652642e8e2593128c7c0f5de3ef6b0d7
into 4.4?
thanks,
PL
Nux, What is broken with systemvm ?
So far the only thing I see as problem with 4.4.1 is the manual db update
for the missing column.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
are you sure their is a space in the account name ? I would not expect an
account name with space to be valid.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Ilia Shakitko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was doing that call from the ROOT admin. The account I specified was the
> Domain Admin of its domain. Specifying the
make sense, in that case, can we create the version 4.4.2 in jira?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:53 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> because of the inevitable problems (people already consuming 4.4.1)
> we'd need to do this as 4.4.2
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > Since its alrea
-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> I j
+1 (binding)
Did a quick test.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Yes I think so. I just read the bylaws [1] again and you’re right this
> voting round would need two more +1 (binding) votes from PM
Hi Daan,
I thought I had fixed it but still causing problem. Jira: CLOUDSTACK-7822.
Please cherry-pick 88561e154f6d451d2437e7e6887417df6106c275 (from Frank
Zhang) which disabled tests. I will work with Syed to fix tests and
renabled them.
Thanks,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud
yes, I don't know why this commit do both but it as been push in master +
4.5.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J
Hi Daan,
We have 1 fix to push into 4.4.2 that we need related to swift, it's an
easy quick fix but we haven't committed yet , still under test.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> go ahead, no protocol carved in stone
-1
1. we were not able to build the 4.4 branch for the last two weeks, so
we haven't done tests against it.
2. there is not 4.4.2 release tag in jira, so I can't provide a proper
Release notes, this doen't justify a -1 ;)
3. we have a fixed issue, CLOUDSTACK-7887 that we would like to add
Hi Daan,
can you merge branch: hotfix/CLOUDSTACK-7887
Also coud it be possible to create a 4.4.2 version in Jira?
thanks
I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@
related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an RC
it would potentially involved more people in the test phases.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
> > On 16-Nov-2014, at 9:50 pm, Ian
testing this on OSX and so far the installation process is easy and
well documented (still few things missing :-P )!
[1]
https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/advanced#start-cloudstack
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*
rik Weber wrote:
> Den søndag 16. november 2014 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion
> følgende:
>
> > I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@
> > related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an
> RC
> > it would potentia
I'm trying to build 4.4.2 from 4.4 branch. I'm having the db deployment
error that schema-441to442.sql does not exist. Could it be the cause of the
problem you are seeing too ?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I run into a strange exception during the spring load phase. Di
ic are running from code on the host machine. Only a
> NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied.
>
> Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and binary-installation-basic.
>
>
> On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
> > Hi Ian,
> > I'm trying
Trying devcloud4 with 4.4 branch and I'm having this issue:
[WARNING]
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessor
Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba wrote:
> +1
>
> for:
>
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/
> <-- build 317
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/
> <-
does it only require to run jenkins as slave? or their is any other
particular requirements?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec
t do note I manually
> patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781.
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> > To: dev@
mysql
query...
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nux! wrote:
> I tried from 4.4.1; what problems are you seeing?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Pierre-Luc
I'm not really in favor of LTS support, it's a good idea, but not sure it
can be backed by the community?[open question here ;)]. I don't think it
fit in our current model for few reasons:
- Upgrade path might become impossible as patches become part of multiple
versions. We could end up with prob
What is your setup and zone type?
>
> Some logs might help, too.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
ot the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName:
> test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS ===
> > ok
> > Tests to change service offering of the Router after ... === TestName:
> test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc | Status : SUCCESS ===
> > ok
>
Good thanks, the release note is ready for 4.4.2.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28523/#review63318
---
Ship it!
CLOUDSTACK-7991
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Nov. 28, 2014, 8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28523/#review63319
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Nov. 28, 2014, 8:55 a.m
/integration/component/test_security_groups.py``
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Nov. 28, 2014, 8:55 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
I'm wondering if I should remove the upgrade instructions of 4.1.x, 4.0.x,
3.0.x and 2.2.14 from the 4.5.0 release notes. These upgrade instructions
are fairly outdated and has not been tested(at least in 4.4). They also
contain errors and some inconsistency.
Unless someone is willing to validate
> On Oct. 7, 2014, 7:08 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> > Hi Rayees,
> > I think hardcoding the jdk dir isnt right. Can you please fix this as per
> > the discussion on the other thread? RR: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25289/
> > mail thread: http://markmail.org/message/eun6jlgd4c27km3b
Rajani
valid, it
require your email address. There is also a conflict for the file:
``engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/VolumeDataStoreVO.java``
Could it be possible to rebase and resubmit a new patch ?
Thanks.
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On June 24, 2014, 5:36 a.m., Hiroki Ohashi
> On May 19, 2014, 10:42 a.m., Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Is it possible that someone is relying on the existing behaviour? I realise
> > that you've made a new method to mimic the existing behaviour, but that
> > will still break people's scripts unless they update them to call the new
> > met
from master
that remove conflict?
thanks
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Jan. 17, 2014, 11:06 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18480/#review63332
---
Ship it!
I guest we can close this one?
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On
added license header with commit: ed6016cf8ee655cb15796b8ffca9f6c29cf8d90d
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Feb. 2, 2014, 5:03 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://review
> On Dec. 1, 2014, 4:16 a.m., Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> > commited: b838436e58a6e7df89d960c7805edc3fd3ed91a4
> > also added license header with commit:
> > ed6016cf8ee655cb15796b8ffca9f6c29cf8d90d
Into master
Actually, here is the best thread to ask the question...
Does anyone validate upgrade instruction from 2.x, 3.x. 4.0.x, 4.1.x since
4.3.0 ?
Thanks,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Well, I've never heard some someone tested upgrading a 2.2.x, 3.x.x, 4.0.x
sk on the users list what to do, what is the answer?
>
> If it is "just follow the upgrade instructions for all consecutive
> releases and it'll be fine", keep it. Otherwise, remove it.
>
> My two cents :)
>
>
> cheers,
>
>
> Leo
>
> On Dec 1, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28523/#review63535
---
Pushed into master and 4.5 branches.
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Nov
Count me In!
I will help as much as possible on CI, git flow testing...
Pierre-Luc
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I am willing to help out in any way I can.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue
userdata once the
VM is created?
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:56 p.m., Jean-Francois Vincent wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
GTM if voice required although, wouldn't make more sense to use
#cloudstack-meeting as it keep record of discussions and is the regular
channel? either way, I will be in on 10 Dec 16 UTC
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Agreed
>
> > --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23991/#review64097
---
Ship it!
commited into master.
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On Dec. 5
to resubmit
a new patch? Thank you Vania.
- Pierre-Luc Dion
On July 8, 2014, 8:51 p.m., Vania Xu wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
Let's fixed the time off the ML: http://doodle.com/xhp57mymv7hyim55
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > having said so, I propose to set a date for our first (irc/goto) meeting;
> > wednesday 10 december 16:00 UTC?
> [Animesh] Can
RN just started, here are regular questions:
1. Do we need a new set of systemvmtemplate?
2. Any special consideration with 4.5?
3. Does new features from this filter is valid for the RN?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7739?filter=12329800
4. Does it really contain 188 fixed from
201 - 300 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
