Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug > (CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs > are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP > service. That bug affects th

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

ils, your basically telling all XEN infrastructure, too bad. no new s3 infrastructure for you, from my perspective this is both bad practice, and again, leaves XEN/XCP users wanting, and waiting again. > On 5/21/13 5:59 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: > > >On Mon, May 20, 2013

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 10:51 AM, John Burwell wrote: > > I would say that the only thing for an open source project worse than not > > releasing is releasing a poor quality release. A late release with high > > quality is soon forgotten

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi folks, > > Some time back I offered to be RM for 4.1.x , since then I took on the > GSoC effort and won't have time to be the RM. > > Therefore the position is up for grabs. > > Any takers ? > can we get a brief description of the r

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On May 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >wrote: > >

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:52:34AM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Chip Childers > > wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > &

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the > "Packt Book" [1] I would like to call a vote. > > Proposal: > > I propose to list CloudStack related books on our website [2]. The page > list

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: > Hi Guys, > > This is the last Gartner Report: > http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb > > Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a > good reason to include support for Orac

Re: [PROPOSAL] QuickCloud

it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as not to use resources required on the hosts Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or other FreeBSD pf box as the virtual router, and just have cloudstack comunicate to it however its probably outside the scope of this document, Im also

Re: [PROPOSAL] QuickCloud

then on the hypervisors > On 3/25/13 1:59 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: > > >it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as > >not to use resources required on the hosts > >Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or other FreeBSD p

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:51 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> > >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ?? > >id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and > >create > >say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that corr

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ? > Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

so clone quickcloud2 ??? On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in > order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out? > > > On 4/8/13 2:

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

t that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in > order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out? > > > On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.c

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

anch last Friday in > order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out? > > > On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> Can you

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Okay so apparently when i fire off cloudstack-management server it is what appears to be eating all the available memory and causing the laptop to swap so im not so sure this is viable at this moment unless i can get CS management to consume considerably less memory On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:19 P

Re: What is your setup?

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Just a general question > > What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? XEN XEN XEN. > > > - Maurice >

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can > freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a > release plan as soon as next week. > > Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future

Some of us would love to contribute, yet don't feel the requirement to sign-up for "sites" to simply post their feelings. That being said... heres mine in public.. remove the "dependency" on NFS as primary/secondary allow for more configurable storage options. Its one of the reasons why

Re: [JENKINS] Build errors

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey guys, > > Several builds have intermittent build errors at the moment. This is > appears to be caused by a problem in the maven system outside our control. > Several jar files we need are not downloaded properly and cause the build > to

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #430

later devlist this is BS On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:18 PM, wrote: > See > > -- > [...truncated 672 lines...] > Receiving objects: 89% (414381/461522), 287.56 MiB | 897 KiB/s > Receiving ob