Hi team
I have a doubt, why ACS allocate primary storage for latest snapshot VDI of
a volume?
The snapshot was transferred to secondary storage but continued on primary.
This is a problem because it uses space of SR (XenServer).
Physical space of snapshot is not a problem, the VDI have 211
base image and then creates a new CoW layer on top of it
where new writes go. Are you seeing more than 2 VDIs?
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Lotic Lists wrote:
> Hi team
>
>
>
> I have a doubt, why ACS allocate primary storage for latest snapshot
> VDI of a volum
Hi all
News about issue 9367?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9367
I need a volume with 6TB. If I create an extended volume with 3x 2TB that
issue affect the environment.
Env: XenServer 6.5, ACS 4.9.2, Guest Win2k12 R2 HVM
Thanks
Marcelo
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM
(HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017
Guys, what you think about enforce password policies for local users?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10082
Regards
Marcelo
tion of the issue it seems to be related to the
problem you are describing. However, I compared the classes that were changed
with PR (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1176) and they are the same
in ACS 4.9.2.0 and 4.9.3.0.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Lotic Lists wrote:
> Hi Rafa
4.9.3.0.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Lotic Lists wrote:
> I tested on a fresh environment, acs 4.9.3.0, xenserver 6.5 with all
> patches and primary storage NFS, we have same problem
>
> - Snapshot files
> [root@acs01 203]# ls -lh /exports/secondary/snapshots/2/6/ total 2.8G
>
.
If this is a huge problem for you right now, I suggest you looking for
companies that provide enterprise support for ACS.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Lotic Lists wrote:
> Hi Rafael
>
> Tested on ACS 4.5.2.2, 4.9.2.0, 4.9.3.0 and 4.10. All versions with
> same issue
>
> Des
gt;
> Can you try with any release between 4.6 to 4.8 and see if this bug is
> there?
>
> Basically, any release which contains commit
> 2c4ea503f92bcf9c611f409d5cdecb42b0115b69
> and missing commit 8a3fd10.
>
> On 02/11/17, 1:14 AM, "Lotic Lists" wrote:
&g
Problem to register ISO in all zones
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10349
Regards
Marcelo
aking the -1
option. That doesn’t explain your GUI issue, but may explain your CloudMonkey
run failure?
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 01/04/2018, 04:36, "Lotic Lists" wrote:
Problem to register ISO in all zones
https://issues.apa
Hi all
After upgrading ACS from 4.9.3 (openswan) to 4.11.2 (strongswan), all VPNs
with multiple networks have stopped working. Only one of the networks
declared in the encryption domain passed traffic.
rightsubnet=192.168.198.0/23,192.168.208.0/23,192.168.170.0/23,192.168.234.0
/23,192.168.
Hi devs.
What is the real status of the issue 8889[1] ?
Merged[2] but not distributed on release 4.9 [3]?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8889
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860
[3]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
13 matches
Mail list logo