Volume snapshot and primary storage space

2017-06-06 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi team I have a doubt, why ACS allocate primary storage for latest snapshot VDI of a volume? The snapshot was transferred to secondary storage but continued on primary. This is a problem because it uses space of SR (XenServer). Physical space of snapshot is not a problem, the VDI have 211

RE: Volume snapshot and primary storage space

2017-06-06 Thread Lotic Lists
base image and then creates a new CoW layer on top of it where new writes go. Are you seeing more than 2 VDIs? On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Lotic Lists wrote: > Hi team > > > > I have a doubt, why ACS allocate primary storage for latest snapshot > VDI of a volum

Issue 9367

2017-06-28 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi all News about issue 9367? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9367 I need a volume with 6TB. If I create an extended volume with 3x 2TB that issue affect the environment. Env: XenServer 6.5, ACS 4.9.2, Guest Win2k12 R2 HVM Thanks Marcelo

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

2017-07-13 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi Rohit. I would suggest the 1829 [1] It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM) [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829 -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017

[FEATURE REQUEST] Enforcing local password policies

2017-10-02 Thread Lotic Lists
Guys, what you think about enforce password policies for local users? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10082 Regards Marcelo

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

2017-10-31 Thread Lotic Lists
tion of the issue it seems to be related to the problem you are describing. However, I compared the classes that were changed with PR (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1176) and they are the same in ACS 4.9.2.0 and 4.9.3.0. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Lotic Lists wrote: > Hi Rafa

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

2017-11-01 Thread Lotic Lists
4.9.3.0. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Lotic Lists wrote: > I tested on a fresh environment, acs 4.9.3.0, xenserver 6.5 with all > patches and primary storage NFS, we have same problem > > - Snapshot files > [root@acs01 203]# ls -lh /exports/secondary/snapshots/2/6/ total 2.8G >

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

2017-11-01 Thread Lotic Lists
. If this is a huge problem for you right now, I suggest you looking for companies that provide enterprise support for ACS. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Lotic Lists wrote: > Hi Rafael > > Tested on ACS 4.5.2.2, 4.9.2.0, 4.9.3.0 and 4.10. All versions with > same issue > > Des

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

2017-11-07 Thread Lotic Lists
gt; > Can you try with any release between 4.6 to 4.8 and see if this bug is > there? > > Basically, any release which contains commit > 2c4ea503f92bcf9c611f409d5cdecb42b0115b69 > and missing commit 8a3fd10. > > On 02/11/17, 1:14 AM, "Lotic Lists" wrote: &g

4.11.0.0 - Error to Register ISO in All Zones

2018-03-31 Thread Lotic Lists
Problem to register ISO in all zones https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10349 Regards Marcelo

RE: 4.11.0.0 - Error to Register ISO in All Zones

2018-04-03 Thread Lotic Lists
aking the -1 option. That doesn’t explain your GUI issue, but may explain your CloudMonkey run failure? Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 01/04/2018, 04:36, "Lotic Lists" wrote: Problem to register ISO in all zones https://issues.apa

Workaround for StrongSwan with several rightsubnet's - ikev1

2019-01-18 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi all After upgrading ACS from 4.9.3 (openswan) to 4.11.2 (strongswan), all VPNs with multiple networks have stopped working. Only one of the networks declared in the encryption domain passed traffic. rightsubnet=192.168.198.0/23,192.168.208.0/23,192.168.170.0/23,192.168.234.0 /23,192.168.

Issue 8889

2016-12-02 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi devs. What is the real status of the issue 8889[1] ? Merged[2] but not distributed on release 4.9 [3]? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8889 [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860 [3] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas