[DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-01 Thread Hieu LE
Hi all, There are some problems while deploying a large amount of VMs in my company with CloudStack. All VMs are deployed from same template (e.g: Windows 7) and the quantity is approximately ~1000VMs. The problems here is low IOPS, low performance of VM (about ~10-11 IOPS, boot time is very high)

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-02 Thread Hieu LE
reating a nfs share out of ssd pool storage and > > create a primary storage in cloudstack out of it named as golden primary > > storage with specific tag like gold, and create a compute offering for > your > > template with the storage tag as gold, hence all the vm's you crea

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-03 Thread Hieu LE
e the storage-pool orchestration logic to take this new > scheme into account. > > Also, we'll have to figure out how this ties into storage tagging (if at > all). > > I'd be happy to review your design and code. > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Hieu LE wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-03 Thread Hieu LE
page for your design. > > Here is a link to applicable design info: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design > > Also, feel free to ask more questions and have me review your design. > > Thanks! > Mike > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:29 P

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-04 Thread Hieu LE
this. You should be good to go now. > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Hieu LE wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > > Could you please give edit/create permission on ASF Jira/Wiki confluence > ? > > I can not add a new Wiki page. > > > > My Jira

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-05 Thread Hieu LE
to local, I *think* that my approach is a little bit easier to customize and can have performance better than Intellicache (cause all IOPS are divided into golden PS and normal PS) > >>> 2. what if someone removes the golden primary storage containing the the >>> pare

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-05 Thread Hieu LE
27;s performance > > forever. > > > > 2. what if someone removes the golden primary storage containing the the > > parent VHD(template) where all the child VDH's in the root primary > storage > > are been pointed to ? > >if so, all vm's running w

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-05 Thread Hieu LE
, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Amit Das > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Hieu, > > >> > > >> Will it be good to include bulk operation of this feature? In > addition, > > >> does Xen support parallel execution of these operations

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-06 Thread Hieu LE
kow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Hieu, > > Would you be able to place these questions and answers in your design doc > so that we can more easily track them? > > Thanks! > Mike > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Hieu LE wrote: > > > Hi Todd, > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-09 Thread Hieu LE
access both > storage pools. > - New Xen Server plug-in for modifying VHD parent id. > > Is there some place for me to submit my design and code. Can I write a new > proposal in CS wiki ? > > [1]: > > http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xendesktop-rho/cds-choose-sche

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-10 Thread Hieu LE
; > > I have reviewed your design (making only minor changes to your Wiki). > > > > > > Please feel free to have me review your code when you are ready. > > > > > > Also, do you have a plan for integration testing? It would be great if > > you &g

Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-19 Thread Hieu LE
he.org/r/22799/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-19 Thread Hieu LE
3d2ec3cf1523ff40 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22799/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-19 Thread Hieu LE
Hi Tim, Mike, This patch apply for golden primary storage feature [1]. Please review it. [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Golden+Primary+Storage On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Hieu LE wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-19 Thread Hieu LE
24b ui/scripts/templates.js e12927c538ad0608337af3ef3d2ec3cf1523ff40 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22799/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-19 Thread Hieu LE
24b ui/scripts/templates.js e12927c538ad0608337af3ef3d2ec3cf1523ff40 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22799/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-23 Thread Hieu LE
planBaseDeployment, line 298, or basePsHostCheck function to check that host can communicate with pool. > > Thanks > > -tim > > > - Tim > > On June 20th, 2014, 3:46 a.m. UTC, Hieu LE wrote: > Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Tim Mackey. > By Hi

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-25 Thread Hieu LE
. >> >> Thanks! >> Mike >> >> Mike, I will update the manual test case cover in review board soon. I am also re-running all test to ensure this feature running well. > >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Hieu LE wrote: >> >>> Hi Tim and Mike, &

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-06-30 Thread Hieu LE
rformed. > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Hieu LE wrote: > >> Hi Tim and Mike, >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: >> >>> Hieu, >>> >>> It would also be good in your design doc and testing to vali

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-07-18 Thread Hieu LE
he.org/r/22799/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-07-20 Thread Hieu LE
that can communicate with base pool: Success. + Migrate to selected pool: Success. - Live migrate running VM to another host: Failed. (Checking result with command: vhd-util query -p -n or vhd-util check -n to see the parent VHD disk location. ) Thanks, Hieu LE

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-07-20 Thread Hieu LE
orry Mike, There are some troubles with my machines last week. I have updated new diff and adding integration tests. Fooling around with marvin is great but may be I need more times with it. Thanks! Hieu LE - Hieu ---

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

2014-07-20 Thread Hieu LE
d in for feature to be accepted. This was >> followed closely in the earlier releases and slowly this is being ignored. >> Can reviewers be more stringent regarding this merge criteria. >> >> Thanks >> /Sudha >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Tut