mvn clean install -Dnonoss -Dnoredist
package.sh -p noredist
Resulting packages installed on Centos 6.5 without the unused directory.
Thanks,
David Bierce
/cloud.spec 83c598b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20921/diff/
Testing
---
Build RPMs on CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 using master
mvn clean install -Dnonoss -Dnoredist
package.sh -p noredist
Resulting packages installed on Centos 6.5 without the unused directory.
Thanks,
David Bierce
That blog posted mentions new templates being created for previous versions of
Cloudstack. The post implies a few days and it has now been a month. Have new
templates been created and the blog post hasn’t been updated or are those still
pending release?
On May 6, 2014, at 8:18 AM, David Na
olume, volume was cleaned up from secondary stoage and database.
Thanks,
David Bierce
there is a duplicate I didn’t find, this issue seems to be neglected.
Thanks,
David Bierce
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/#review51442
---
- David Bierce
On Aug. 17, 2014, 3:02 a.m., David Bierce wrote
the table is
deprecated and should never have new data in it.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/#review51439
---------
/24779/diff/
Testing
---
On Cloudstack 4.2 4.3
Set cleanupurl to 30 seconds. Downloaded a template, cleanup remvoed it from
database, didn't remove the template.
Downloaded Volume, volume was cleaned up from secondary stoage and database.
Thanks,
David Bierce
> On Aug. 25, 2014, 9:12 p.m., David Bierce wrote:
> >
>
> Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Let me know if your patch should be applied to 4.3 as well, as I am
> preparing 4.3.1
It appears fixed in a refactor by Nitin Mehta for 4.3 so no merge for 4.3
operations be
handled by Java?
Thanks,
David Bierce
,
David Bierce
On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> If we could keep code like that all in Java, that would be my personal
> preference.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:42 AM, David Bierce
> wrote:
>
>> While investigating an issue with secondary s
after patched.
Tested against cloudstack 4.2.1
Centos 6.4
Patch is against 4.3 since 4.2+ is effected by the issue.
Thanks,
David Bierce
issue in all version of
cloudstack on CentOS/KVM as a hypervisor.
Review Request 25585: [CLOUDSTACK-2823] SystemVMs start fail on CentOS 6.4
Thanks,
David Bierce
Senior System Administrator | Appcore
Office +1.800.735.7104
Direct +1.515.612.7801
www.appcore.com
On Sep 12, 2014, at 1:23 PM
)
Updated Patch which includes a sleep
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/09/13/c612e257-c83e-4a8e-8970-44d078838db6__patch.diff
Thanks,
David Bierce
Good Idea. I’ve submitted an update with a little wait in the while so to not
stress out the CPU waiting. Looks like it missed against the 4.3.1 release,
should I also submit for 4.4.1?
Thanks,
David Bierce
Senior System Administrator | Appcore
Office +1.800.735.7104
Direct
Sorry for the spam. Apple mail decided apache dev list was the destination for
our internal mailing list. It has been fixed.
Thanks,
David Bierce
Senior System Administrator | Appcore
Office +1.800.735.7104
Direct +1.515.612.7801
www.appcore.com
We now have a mirror of cloudstack locally.
http://mirror.appcore.com/cloudstack/
Contains both cloudstack signed RPM and DEBs
/rhel for the rpm repo for YUM
/ubuntu for the deb repo for APT
This is also a mirror of the all the systemvms for all versions in /systemvms
Thanks,
David Bierce
herwise been
untouched. Is there a normal process to accept or reject patches rather than
letting them sit in limbo for a few months?
Thanks,
David Bierce
-
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/#review62374
---
On Aug. 27, 2014, 3:46 p.m., David Bierce wrote:
>
> ---
> This
pNFS is NFS v4.1 with a the ability to have the head end paralleled and HA, but
you’re still reliant on the backend doing any sort of replication. Adding
support the cloudstack way would be trivial if it was just verified the client
supported it on the hypervisor, and even then the deployments I
>>
>
> Be aware that CephFS should not be used for hosting virtual machines.
> RBD, the block device is much better for that job and already support
> with KVM since CloudStack 4.0
Today, yes, don’t use CephFS for virtual machines. We did try running CephFS
for virtualization and it was, not f
-proxy demon could even be a mostly drop in enchantment with some advanced
serial console features, but the agent could also be extended to handle the
authentication and proxy/websockifying.
Is this a horrible, awful idea?
David Bierce
elf. The new api
> call would be unnecessary if the proxy were integrated.
>
> I think it would be great if the console proxy were to get revamped to host
> novnc+websocket proxy. It would be faster and more featureful. Even just a
> websocket proxy would be nice, as people wo
23 matches
Mail list logo
