Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

It could enable a volume service for baremetal, but currently it is too tied to NetApp. On 9/18/13 11:35 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >I think it should be removed. > >--Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 1

Re: [Merge] Minimal Hyper-V Plugin

Thanks for the preliminary testing. Questions: 1. More for the community: should the C# code be in a separate repo? According to the merge request, mono and maven can be used to build the agent. 2. Packaging: how is the C# agent installed? 3. What does minimal mean? What works? What doesn't? Local

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

I don't think adding an API to CloudStack is particularly appropriate way to integrate with whirr? Whirr should *use* the CloudStack API, not add to it? On 9/20/13 1:09 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > >> >> The Nicira NVP plugin is also

Re: API extract exact name

Is this the same issue as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3080 On 9/20/13 2:33 PM, "Ian Duffy" wrote: >Hi, > >It possible extract a specific virtualmachine from listvirtualmachines >by giving a name name field? > >Basically, I want equality instead of like. I'm having an issue w

Re: SSHException('Error reading SSH protocol banner',) while sshing to a machine behind a load balancing rule

What tool/library are you using to perform the SSH? SSH is not a good way to test the algorithm. How are you going to test other stickiness methods? Best to use good old HTTP. On 9/22/13 9:30 PM, "Ashutosh Kelkar" wrote: >I am currently trying to validate the stickiness policy of a load >balanci

Re: [PROPOSAL] adding [SOLVED] tag in mailing list subject

Excellent suggestion On 9/23/13 6:50 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi, > >When the issues raised in dev/users mailing lists are solved by using >suggestions/solutions as replies >send by community members then the one who raised the issue please reply >to the thread by adding [SOLVED] tag. >

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

If you remove it, it will break the following APIs: createPool createVolumeOnFiler createLunOnFiler AssociateLun Here's how it is used: The steps are 1. create a volume pool using the createPool API (algorithm can be "leas

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

I still think this is the wrong way to implement the Whirr integration. On 9/23/13 6:45 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Darren Shepherd > wrote: > >> The only way this will get committed is if we either move to latest >>gson or >> jackson. Regardless, the outcome will be tha

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Logs? On 9/23/13 12:46 PM, "Indra Pramana" wrote: >Dear all, > >The script failed to restart the system VMs. See below. > >All my system VMs (except one virtual router) are in "Starting" state but >it never got started. Any idea how to resolve this issue? > >=== >nohup: ignoring input >/usr/bin/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) On 9/20/13 8:36 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > > > >I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > >Git Branch and Commit SH: >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs >/heads/4.2 >Commit: 69c459342c568e2400d57ee885

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

eep, > >I have uploaded the logs in pastebin here: > >http://pastebin.com/jy49jF4A > >Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > >Cheers. > > > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Logs? >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

Wow. Nice! On 9/24/13 6:04 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: >Hi, > >I am quite pumped to announce a Google Compute Engine (GCE) interface to >CloudStack. > >Ian Duffy, Darren Brogan and myself worked on this on github over the >last month. Our latest branch: > >https://github.com/NOPping/cloudstack-gce/tree/

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Ha! Prussians == Prasanna? Godawful autocorrect. On 9/24/13 6:47 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Darren, you can probably work with Prussians to get it through the bvt >suite. That would be a nice start. > >Cheers, > >Hugo > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 sep. 2013, at 09:06, Darren Shepherd >> wr

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

+1 (binding) On 9/25/13 10:13 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all! > >As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a >Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack. The code itself has been posted >to reviewboard [1]. The design has been documented by Pedro [2]. > >[1] https://review

Re: [Merge] Minimal Hyper-V Plugin

+1 to put this into a branch off of master. Can merge into master after unit tests for the agent API. On 9/24/13 12:37 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote: >On paternity leave, so I don't get to these emails right away... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chira

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. It is simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal does not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the AGPL. I think the idea is to have a tight monitoring loop that scales: so exec

Re: ubuntu LTS for system vm? and 64bit?

32-bit theoretically performs better on Xen. Debian is just more stable than Ubuntu, hence the preference. On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04 >and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any >techn

Re: Documentation on VPC?

CloudStack VPC is quite similar to AWS VPC, except for some of the differences listed here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vhHMAQ On 9/25/13 3:30 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >I've been trying to go through the GUI and do stuff with VPC and I'm >really quite lost. Are there any user docs

Re: ubuntu LTS for system vm? and 64bit?

I though I heard something about upgrading the template >for multicore networking or something like that. > >Darren > >> On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote: >> >> 32-bit theoretically performs better on Xen. >> Debian is just more stable

Re: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

I believe Darren's proposed Spring refactor will help greatly. On 9/26/13 7:41 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >I think its an artifact from the Spring stuff six months ago. We can >probably decrease that in the default tomcat conf now. >On Sep 26, 2013 6:11 AM, "Geoff Higginbottom" < >geoff.higgin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

al. Why >reinvent that part of it? > >--Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:28 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service mon

Re: ubuntu LTS for system vm? and 64bit?

That enabled running without a system vm. But you'd still need a VR if you wanted network services. On 9/26/13 12:47 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> >> >> On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: >>> Is there any technical r

Re: Review Request 14320: add boolean option httpModeEnabled to the service offering for use in haproxy conf

meone creating 2 offerings: one with HttpClose and one without HttpClose? - Chiradeep Vittal On Sept. 26, 2013, 7:01 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://rev

Re: Review Request 11981: Adding base support for NVP security groups to the NVP API

> On June 20, 2013, 6:40 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Minor nitpick : our code conventions recommend the method naming to not use > > underscore. so it's lowerCaseAndNoUnderscores() > > > > http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/coding-conventions.html > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel

Not to be a fanboi and all that and hating to divert this topic, but doing it anyway, I do like 'flat'. On 9/26/13 5:12 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >I don't agree. > >For the reference, take a look at OpenStack UI and compare it to ACS >specifically version 4.2 > > >- All mistakes in this messag

Re: Scalable Backup and Recovery

Ah I see. You mean a "scalable user experience". The actual scalability of the snapshot process itself is limited by available disk and network bandwidth. Also certain hypervisors have various quirks which stand in the way of an efficient solution. On 9/27/13 10:27 AM, "SuichII, Christopher" wro

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

t; they are essentially stateless? I don't know, but management server, >> local daemons, and other SysVMs making decisions seems like we are >> increasing complexity. >> >> --David >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote:

Re: Review Request 14320: add boolean option httpModeEnabled to the service offering for use in haproxy conf

define it zone wide every tenant has the same setting whilst you >want this to tune setting (like with maxConnections) for a tenant. > >regards, >Daan > > >On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >wrote: > >>This is an automatically generated e-mail

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provide Option to Quiesce VMs While Taking Snapshots

Is VM Quiescing sufficient to ensure consistency of the snapshot? On 9/30/13 2:43 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >CloudStack currently snapshots vm disks by taking hypervisor snapshots. >However, when implementing the storage subsystem API interface >takeSnapshot(), the VM associated with th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot

+1. On 9/30/13 2:31 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >The storage subsystem API currently has an interface for takeSnapshot() >and an associated externally facing API for takeSnapshot. There is also a >method on the primary data store interface for revertSnapshot(). However, >this method is un

Re: [PROPOSAL] SSVM Generic Copy

While SSVM is OK to understand the concept, it is more generically a transfer daemon which can run in a VM or not. For example, QuickCloud[1] takes the SSVM's daemon out and runs it on a standard Linux OS. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ On 9/30/13 2:37 PM, "SuichII, Christopher"

[POLL] Latency between Management Server and zones

[Apologize for the crosspost, but I think there may be answers from the dev perspective] [Also, this is poll / opinion question] What is the maximum latency / minimum bandwidth folks have between their Management Server and the hypervisor? What works? What needs to be tweaked? TIA

[DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

We have a couple of people trying to expose the advanced capabilities of the underlying physical resources to the end-user. In the case of Nicolas FOATA, he is trying to expose some of the advanced functions of XenServer/XCP, and in the case of Daan, he is trying to expose some feature of HAProx

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Got it. Any other OSS tool out there similar to monit? On 10/1/13 8:24 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. It >>is >> simply too gen

Wiki access

Apparently, edit access has been revoked for all. Who do we contact for edit permissions? TIA

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Chip, that makes perfect sense to me. On 10/2/13 1:10 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: >> I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever >>use newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the >>benefi

Re: Wiki access

;m using alena1108 as the example for committer / >> contributor permissions. >> >> So if you are not a committer, give your confluence ID in this thread >>and >> PMC folks can help get them added (make them look like alena's perms). >> >> >&g

Re: HA is broken on master

Perhaps as a result of this work: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/tYvlAQ I think Kelven is trying to separate the job state (starting, stopping) from the actual VM state. On 10/2/13 3:36 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Alex, > >In scheduleRestart() when it calls _itMgr.advanceStop() it used

Re: HA is broken on master

My bad. I thought this was merged into master, but it isn't. On 10/2/13 4:24 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Why is the work happening in master? > > >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> Perhaps as a result of this work: >> https:/

Re: System VM

I enabled cloudfront on this so that folks in S.America/Africa/Europe/Asia/Oceania can have better speeds. Just substitute d21ifhcun6b1t2.cloudfront.net for download.cloud.com On 10/2/13 4:21 PM, "Travis Graham" wrote: >Here are the correct links for 4.2.0: > >Xenserver : >http://download.cl

Re: Wiki access

Daan, it is at the 'Browse' drop down at the upper right. Heh On 10/3/13 10:33 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >I'm not seeing any links for editting permissions either. id == dahn > > >On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> May I get access to edit/add pages as well? >> My

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

posing >>>the >>> > abstract feature only to those instantiating a vpc, isn't it? This >>>last >>> > question probably touches on the reason you are addressing my >>>submission >>> > together with the ones from Nicolas I see only people

Re: Wiki access

t;> > > exclude space admin. I'm using alena1108 as the example for >>committer >> / >> > > contributor permissions. >> > > >> > > So if you are not a committer, give your confluence ID in this >>thread >> and >> &g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

hanks, >Jayapal > >On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller wrote: > >> supervisord maybe? >> >> - Original Message - >> >> From: "Chiradeep Vittal" >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:45:5

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

I've checked the Netscaler and HAProxy docs, this appears to be artifact of the HAProxy implementation (inability to support keep-alive). For a cloud operator that chooses Netscaler or F5 for load balancing, this won't make any sense. On 10/3/13 12:55 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Thu, Oct 3, 2

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I'm not getting any notifications of BVT test failures. Where do I subscribe? On 10/8/13 10:20 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT >(and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists >somewhere doing something, but

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

+1. We should get a call out to the community to see who is expecting to merge for 4.3. Although 10/31 is the feature freeze date, proposals and branches should be in already IMHO. On 10/8/13 9:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

ng the code is perfect, but so far its >not terribly bad :) > >Darren > >On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> I'm not getting any notifications of BVT test failures. Where do I >> subscribe? >> >> On 10/8/13 10:20 AM, "D

Re: [DISCUSS] Transaction Hell

+1 to option B (for a lot of the reasons enunciated by Darren). Also, let's get this in right away so that by 1/31/2014 we are confident about the change and fixed any bugs uncovered by the new scheme. On 10/9/13 10:29 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Pedro, > >From a high level I think we'd probab

Re: System VM template caching

http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Releas e_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html On 10/9/13 10:11 AM, "kel...@backbonetechnology.com" wrote: >We tested deleting the template on primary storage, and it failed to >regenerate. > >What is the documented method for regis

Re: Review Request 14320: add boolean option httpModeEnabled to the service offering for use in haproxy conf

oad balancer. This should be leveraged. >> >> Actually in the Schuberg Philis implementation it must. The solution >>that is >> now done at the actual site is hacked into the running VR. This will >>then >> lead to an emergency if the router is recreated for some

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove Setters from *JoinVO

If there's no compile errors then it should not require any tests. On 10/10/13 8:02 AM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >I went ahead and removed all setters from *JoinVOs this morning and >played around in my environment. There were no compile errors since >nobody called those setters, everything

[cloudmonkey] username / password support

Hi folks, I modified cloudmonkey to work off of username and password. Feedback and testing required. The code is in the branch username_password_support http://goo.gl/5xTgo5 Thanks -- Chiradeep

Re: wiki édit access

Done On 10/15/13 8:07 PM, "Srikanteswararao Talluri" wrote: >I need wiki edit access for the below mentioned account. >Username : talluri > > >Thanks, >~Talluri

Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support

%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw> >or >ryanlei750...@gmail.com > > > >On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I modified cloudmonkey to work off of username and password. Feedback >>and >> testing required. >> The code is in the branch username_password_support >> http://goo.gl/5xTgo5 >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Chiradeep >>

Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support

ail.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SW >>YpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVKkNHfn9F1Bn-vUWJnQ4.&URL=mail >>to%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw> >> or >> ryanlei750...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11

Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support

quests just like marvin. I tested out the changes >with a user account and everything works fine. But startup of >cloudmonkey seems to force one to put in the username, passwd in >cloudmonkey/config. > >On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:51:23AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> Sorry,

RE: [cloudmonkey] username / password support

y want. If this could be refactored as a reusable module Prasanna can use this for Marvin. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Sorry, urllib2 and cookiejar looked just too painful. > Totally agree, we should throw away painful t

Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support

Fixed pep8 and other issues (with flake8). Does this warrant a new release? On 10/16/13 11:13 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >Passwords can be changed too. No difference in security, IMO. > >Plus the api key option is always there. > >In fact I first wrote it as an opt

Re: S3 API broken in 4.2

Yeah, it was always a tech preview kind of thing. The basic operations used to work, but since most of the available client tools (s3cmd/boto/etc) had special workarounds for odd AWS behaviors (in the return behavior), they would have a hard time working with the S3 implementation in CloudStack whi

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

+1 On 10/21/13 11:11 AM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote: >As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of >source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated >with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based >VMs. > >The client's sourc

Re: LXC and SSVM/CPVM on the host

As far as I understand, in an LXC scenario, the system vms are expected to run on real hypervisors. You can always use the QuickCloud way to not use system vms at all. On 10/21/13 1:45 PM, "Francois Gaudreault" wrote: >Ok I think we have to look at this further. I'll stop hijacking other >thread

Re: How does HA work?

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/dwn8AQ On 10/23/13 10:51 AM, "Kelcey Jamison Damage" wrote: >I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat" method for HA, unless that's >changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage. > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Nux!" >To: d

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

32-bit vms also "generally" perform better on XenServer (depending on the workload). The issue with 32-bit Linux is that it has usually only has 800M for so for available for the kernel [1]. This limits the number of connections that can be tracked by the conntrack module to around 800/300 =~ 2.5 m

Re: Metadata URL location

For the VPC virtual router case this would this have to be done on all guest interfaces? Could we alias localhost on the VR to 169.254.169.254? For shared networks, basic zone and networks where the VR is not the default gateway, we would have to send another (169.254.0.0/16) route in the DHCP res

Re: LXC and SSVM/CPVM on the host

secondary storage, and router VMs. >> >> We discussed the possibility of creating System VMs for LXC. There >> was concern with the complexity and potential issues involving >> iptables for the router inside an LXC container. As an >> intermediat

Re: Metadata URL location

e to see us do this change. At least in the >KVM case, it would be real nice to be able to pickup the standard ubuntu >(or fedora) cloud qcow and have it run in CloudStack. > >Darren > >> On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote: >> >> For th

Re: Review Request 14914: Make commands.properties optional for non-ACS code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14914/#review27538 --- Ship it! - Chiradeep Vittal On Oct. 24, 2013, 10:06 p.m., Darren

Re: [Merge] hyperv branch to master

+1 On 10/28/13 4:41 AM, "Devdeep Singh" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to merge the support for Hyperv to the master branch. >Development for this has been done by Donal, Rajesh, Anshul and I on >branch [1]. The feature was proposed for merge earlier [3] but unit tests >for hyperv agent code were r

Re: [Merge] hyperv branch to master

That could be a decision to put off for later. The release process deals with single repos for now. The signing will come up during the build right? How do other OSS C# projects deal with it? Perhaps they release binaries in addition to source? On 10/29/13 9:35 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Mon,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OCCI Interface

Awesome On 11/5/13 5:06 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: >Hi, > >I am pleased to announce an OGF OCCI interface to CloudStack. > >Isaac Chiang contributed back to our ruby client and forked rOCCI-server >to make this happen. Many thanks to him. > >I wrote about it here: >http://buildacloud.org/blog/296-occi-

[PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) is an effort to utilize server virtualization in conjunction with industry standard servers, network hardware switches and storage hardware to achieve significant time and costs reductions in the Telecommunication industry. ETSI [1] has a group (NFV ISG [2]) t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

t;John Kinsella" wrote: >+1 > >On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> I volunteer you. >> >> We need to do this. >> >> -Sebastien >> >> On 5 Nov 2013, at 20:28, Chiradeep Vittal >>wrote: >> >>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

It may be an admin burden, but it has to be optional. There are other ways to achieve global sync (e.g., LDAP/AD/Oauth). A lot of service providers who run cloudstack have their own user database / portal. In their implementations the CloudStack database is not the master source of user records, bu

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

es during partitions. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem On 11/7/13 11:58 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> It may be an admin burden, but it has to be optional. There are other >>ways >> to achieve

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

p Childers >>wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: >>>> 2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal >>>> >>>>> While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to attend. >>>>> The particularly interest

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

I'll do it since I actually know some of the folks On 11/12/13 8:43 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Ok, > >when nothing there is nothing else to add I will send out this >tonight. Unless you want to make the contact yourself, Chiradeep. > >I'll put you and Nguyen in cc > >Daan > >On Tue, Nov 12, 201

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

VNF = virtualized network function (e.g., LB virtual appliance) NFV = network functions virtualization (the whole kit and caboodle) On 11/12/13 6:53 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: > >On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > >> OK, here's the draft of the L

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

oogle Spanner comes to mind) -- Chiradeep On 11/8/13 4:53 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >We are already (generally) AP for most infra changes really. I'd use that >model. Eventual consistency is better in this scenario. > >> On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Chiradeep Vitta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

There's also NFVI - Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure On 11/12/13 11:26 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Well, i just learned something and someone sure loves confusion through >acronyms > >-Sebastien > >On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:28, Chiradeep Vitta

Re: the plea to openstack

In the same vein (things to watch out for) http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-vid eos/presentation/state-of-the-stack On 11/6/13 8:34 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >http://stochasticresonance.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/openstack-a-plea/ > >I thought this was an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Is it possible that devs who missed the cutoff for 4.2 simply put it into 4.2.1? That is the feature was 90% done / tested, but missed. On 11/14/13 4:58 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Marcus: > >Is this is a -1? > >I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for >me (though I h

Re: CloudStack.next

+1 to IAM. An Autoscale service independent of Netscaler. I'd like to see the built-in GRE controller fully fleshed out as a distributed/cross-AZ virtual network provider. Make it the out-of-the-box virtual network provider instead of VLAN. Easier service vm insertion into virtual networks. Better

Re: Trunk interface to VM

You want to pass the vlan tags into a VM that is actually a XenServer? On 11/14/13 3:02 PM, "Francois Gaudreault" wrote: >Is there a way to assign a trunked interface to a VM running in CS? Like >assign the entire guest interface. We have a use case where we need to run >XenServer hosts within a

Re: SDN compat matrix

Also BigSwitch VNS 4.2 -- Chiradeep > On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my > presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like > to check it against your combine

Re: Trunk interface to VM

d of CS inside CS). Lets >say we do have devs with ambitious needs :) > >Francois >On 2013-11-15 9:46 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >wrote: > >> You want to pass the vlan tags into a VM that is actually a XenServer? >> >> On 11/14/13 3:02 PM, "Francois Ga

Re: CloudStack.next

Realhostip.com is not required. See: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX133468 But I agree that realhostip should not be made the default (default should be http). On 11/16/13 2:30 AM, "Nux!" wrote: >On 12.11.2013 23:41, Steve Wilson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3

Re: [DISCUSS] Specific information for hypervisor

Thanks Nicolas for opening the discussion. Since it is in the offering, I guess the user won't be able to see it (which is a good thing). Is it a generic key/value set you want to send down? Can you take us through the flow of how the PCI passthrough would work? I would imagine the Allocator wou

Re: Windows support for KVM

I don't really understand the issue. What is the difference between 8 and 1 Why does Windows see only 4 cores in the first case? Is it because the 8 cores are split across physical sockets? On 11/18/13 6:55 AM, "Arnaud Gaillard" wrote: >Hello, > >A few days ago I created a new Jira t

Re: [LXC]How to start System VM

See this discussion: http://goo.gl/Kj0rNr On 11/18/13 2:03 PM, "Frank Zhang" wrote: >I have successfully added a LXC host in ACS4.2, however, the system vm >didn't come up. Is there any specific instruction to make SSVM up? >Thanks

Re: About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

st network in the create advanced zone wizard. > >And, the field "vnet" is null in database table "physical_network". > >How to specify this parameters? > >-- >From: "Chiradeep Vittal" >Sent: Friday,

Re: stackmate ToDo

Hi Dharmesh, You got the code structure right. Are you available on IRC (#cloudstack-dev) so we could discuss more? I am in the process of putting a web interface on stackmate. I am in PDT time zone. On 5/20/13 6:36 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Dharmesh, > >Adding Chiradeep to this thread, since

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

+1 On 5/20/13 1:15 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >All, > >As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug >(CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs >are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP >service. That bug affects the system VM

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

May I humbly suggest that the configuration (SG + Advanced + VMWare) was never supported and the end user got themselves into an unfortunate situation by using an unsupported configuration (even if the software let them do it). I have perused both 2.2.13 and 2.2.14 install guides and it is quite cl

Re: CLOUDSTACK-2554: Yet another blocker?

Also, why would the 4.2 system vm template block 4.1 ? On 5/20/13 12:40 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 06:38:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 06:28:38PM +, Koushik Das wrote: >> > The problem is that there is no default ctor in >> > XcpSer

Re: About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

ep to specify the vnet range in the create >advanced >zone wizard. > >Is it have some preprocess before specify this range ? > >-----原始郵件- >From: Chiradeep Vittal >Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 12:45 AM >To: Garnet Tang ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: A

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

;>> I'm +0 on this, dont want to hold up a release with a neg 1 vote. My >>>> opinion is that time sync is critical piece for system vm's. Having >>>>the >>>> wrong time can lead to system vm's booting and waiting for manual >>>> in

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we pause merges into master until 4.1 is out the door?

I don't see limited interest. It seems that bugs are trickling in every day and they are being taken up as they come in. Is there any blocker without any action for more than a few days? The only one I can see CLOUDSTACK-2463. That one is baffling to me and several others -- because the configurati

Re: About XAPI task queue

Are you looking for information on how XAPI does async processing? http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/VM_Startup http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XAPI_Dispatch On 5/21/13 1:52 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote: >no one can explain it for me? > > >2013/5/10 Nguyen Anh Tu > >> Hi forks, >> >> I'm working on CS + XCP. I

Re: About XAPI task queue

Also http://docs.vmd.citrix.com/XenServer/4.0.1/sdk/ch04.html#id2538486 On 5/21/13 10:12 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >Are you looking for information on how XAPI does async processing? >http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/VM_Startup > >http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XAPI_Dispatch &

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >