Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
chrxmvtik commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536081039 Hi @CodeBleu sorry for the offtop, but I just wanted to know, how you managed to make `details` work. When I specified custom compute service offering an

Re: CloudStack 5?

2024-12-11 Thread Rene Moser
.oO(...oh boy, what have I started...) Although I'd like to see more ‘major releases’ where we show that ‘things’ can break, our release strategy and feature integration has worked pretty well. It looks silly to discuss weather 4.21 or 5.0. I just want to point out that at some point between

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
chrxmvtik commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536257655 > @chrxmvtik What version of TF and TF Cloudstack provider you using? > > Any more info of your "custom offering" might be helpful too. Of course:

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
CodeBleu commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536429474 @chrxmvtik if you can use [CloudMonkey](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey) ( cmk ) it would be helpful to see the other info that the UI doesn't

Re: CloudStack 5?

2024-12-11 Thread Bryan Lima
Hello, René I don't think you should apologize, we are a community after all, and we are bound to disagree at some point. This discussion is very important to this project and it will have to be made at some time in the future, so why not now? As Pearl said, we will need time and effort to mak

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
chrxmvtik commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536534852 > @chrxmvtik if you can use [CloudMonkey](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey) ( cmk ) it would be helpful to see the other info that the UI doesn

Re: [I] Can't scale non-fixed offerings [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
CodeBleu commented on issue #149: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/149#issuecomment-2536533390 Closing this as it should actually be under Apache/Cloudstack repo anyway. Here is an[ existing issue](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6865) in tha

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
CodeBleu commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536698257 > > @chrxmvtik if you can use [CloudMonkey](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey) ( cmk ) it would be helpful to see the other info that the UI does

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
CodeBleu commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2536837437 @chrxmvtik I just tested with an `unconstrained` offering and get the same error as you when trying to update an existing instance, but if you create the insta

Re: [I] Issue with Details in cloudstack_instance resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-12-11 Thread via GitHub
chrxmvtik commented on issue #148: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/148#issuecomment-2537107279 > @chrxmvtik I just tested with an `unconstrained` offering and get the same error as you when trying to update an existing instance that had a different offer

RE: CloudStack 5?

2024-12-11 Thread Alex Mattioli
Agree with you 100% and I think this is a very valid discussion. -Original Message- From: Rene Moser Sent: 11 December 2024 06:51 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack 5? .oO(...oh boy, what have I started...) Although I'd like to see more ‘major releases’ where we