ugenk opened a new pull request, #428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428
In upgrade manuals, in all debian/ubuntu examples there is incorrect apt-get
command used.
`apt-get upgrade` by itself does not requires any parameters.
Upgrade of particular package
DaanHoogland commented on PR #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428#issuecomment-2317199022
@ugenk I think the proper way is to `apt-get update ` actually,
what do you think? `apt-get install ` would assume it is a new
package.
--
This is an automated m
ugenk commented on PR #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428#issuecomment-2317204780
nope, you can check the man page, and also actual results (see the list of
the packages going to be upgraded):
```
ns1:~# apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Do
ugenk commented on PR #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428#issuecomment-2317208998
```
upgrade
upgrade is used to install the newest versions of all packages
currently installed on the system from the sources enumerated in
/etc/apt/
DaanHoogland commented on PR #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428#issuecomment-2317236938
@ugenk not `upgrade`, but `update` is the proper command.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
rohityadavcloud opened a new pull request, #429:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/429
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
rohityadavcloud commented on code in PR #429:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/429#discussion_r1735958382
##
source/adminguide/backup_and_recovery.rst:
##
@@ -28,13 +28,17 @@ The following providers are currently supported:
- VMware with Veeam Bac
kiranchavala commented on PR #419:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/419#issuecomment-2317498827
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
blueorangutan commented on PR #419:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/419#issuecomment-2317504155
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/419.
(QA-JID 254)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
blueorangutan commented on PR #419:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/419#issuecomment-2317501886
@kiranchavala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
ugenk commented on PR #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/428#issuecomment-2317691097
again nope, `update` just updates the cache of package lists. proper command
is `install`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
Hi,
See my inline reply
> Is this going to be a new network? Or can existing VPC networks upgrade
to Routed Mode?
You need to create a new network offering, and a new network.
> Since every VM will get to have its own Public IP, does it mean every VM
can have its own firewall rules now?
every
Hi Bryan,
What's your use case for 50 autoscale groups in 1 VR? When designing the
feature we never envisioned more than 2 or 3.
In NAT mode you should be able to get some 3gpbs through the VR, in ROUTED mode
then some 6-7gbps. Those numbers do go down (considerably sometimes) with the
number
Thanks for sharing. Interesting
How many cpu and memory does you VR have ?
-Wei
On Thursday, August 29, 2024, Bryan Tiang wrote:
> Hi Alex and Wei Zhou,
>
> Thanks for the input, so it seems this new feature is more beneficial for
> those who are currently using Shared Networks.
>
> We have 50
rajujith opened a new pull request, #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/430
Fixing the incorrect mention of Hyper-V
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
rajujith commented on PR #429:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/429#issuecomment-2320070748
I would also recommend listing the supported B&R providers in the
compatibility matrix along with this one.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
16 matches
Mail list logo
