Re: [RELEASE][4.18]

LS, small update, I didn´t quite make it this weekend, I merged the last major feature, 2FA this morning but we have some regressions in the UI [1][2] and there are integration tests failing [3], I think we better address those before creating an RC. I would like to ask the tungsten fabric contribu

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rohityadavcloud merged pull request #293: User two factor authentication

rohityadavcloud merged PR #293: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/293 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] harikrishna-patnala commented on pull request #238: Update service offering section with new compute offering and disk offering changes

harikrishna-patnala commented on PR #238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/238#issuecomment-1427731973 Hi @DaanHoogland can you please consider merging this PR as well, this is missed last time. The upstream PR is already merged https://github.com/apache/clou

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland commented on pull request #41: [ON HOLD FEATURE NOT READY] add getDiagnosticsData API and UI documentation

DaanHoogland commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/41#issuecomment-1427814953 not sure if this is still applicable, but if it is it will need an overhaul. closing. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland closed pull request #41: [ON HOLD FEATURE NOT READY] add getDiagnosticsData API and UI documentation

DaanHoogland closed pull request #41: [ON HOLD FEATURE NOT READY] add getDiagnosticsData API and UI documentation URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/41 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an

Re: [DISCUSSION] Management of the database's "VIEW"s

> > Thank you for the replies, guys. > > I agree using frameworks (ORM and/or OOQ) might facilitate CloudStack's > developers' life. Given the complexity of the project and the whole > analysis and discussion necessary, it would require a lot of effort and > time to implement it, as Daan mentioned;

Re: [DISCUSSION] Management of the database's "VIEW"s

I think I messed up with the format of my last email. Here follows the message in the correct format: --- Thank you for the replies, guys. I agree using frameworks (ORM and/or OOQ) might facilitate CloudStack's developers' life. Given the complexity of the project and the whole analysis and disc