Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17

2022-01-31 Thread Boris Stoyanov
+1, I can help with triage/testing and any other business Nicolas, let me know if you need any additional hands. Bobby. From: Ivet Petrova Date: Friday, 28 January 2022, 16:11 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 Nicolas, Just to men

[GitHub] [cloudstack-terraform-provider] DaanHoogland commented on issue #31: Failure to add secondary IP to a NIC for a VM in a project

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland commented on issue #31: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/31#issuecomment-1025620436 @Pearl1594 is this a cloudstack issue? I.E. does the API allow the action that the tf provider can't? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git S

[GitHub] [cloudstack-terraform-provider] Pearl1594 commented on issue #31: Failure to add secondary IP to a NIC for a VM in a project

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
Pearl1594 commented on issue #31: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/31#issuecomment-1025625833 I was able to do it directly on ACS, so I believe it's a limitation on the provider end - only when the scope is within a project. The issue I believe is that w

[GitHub] [cloudstack-terraform-provider] Pearl1594 edited a comment on issue #31: Failure to add secondary IP to a NIC for a VM in a project

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
Pearl1594 edited a comment on issue #31: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/31#issuecomment-1025625833 @DaanHoogland I was able to do it directly on ACS, so I believe it's a limitation on the provider end - only when the scope is within a project. The issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.4.0

2022-01-31 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
Thanks for all testing and votes. May I request a few more PMC members to test and vote here, we have 2 binding votes till now. Regards, Harikrishna From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 1:11 PM To: dev Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.4.0

2022-01-31 Thread Vladimir Petrov
+1 I tested all resources (create/modify/destroy operations) on KVM, XCPNG 8.2 and VMWare 6.7u3 and ACS versions 4.14. 4.15 and 4.16. I think it's working pretty fine and it will be a great milestone in the ACS - Terraform integration. Best wishes, Vladimir Harikrishna Patnala wrote: Hi Al

Not able to autoscale kubernetes cluster

2022-01-31 Thread Rishabh Rapatwar
Hi all, I am trying to autoscale kubernetes cluster, but it's not working. Following are the logs of cluster-autoscaler pod in kube-system: I0131 17:01:11.537869 1 client.go:175] NewAPIRequest response status code:200 I0131 17:01:11.538288 1 cloudstack_manager.go:88] Got cluster : &{c

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17

2022-01-31 Thread Rohit Yadav
Sounds good to me, thanks for volunteering Nicolas. Regards. From: Boris Stoyanov Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 13:58 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 +1, I can help

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.4.0

2022-01-31 Thread Boris Stoyanov
+1 (binding) I’m basing my vote on Vladi’s testing because I did not had a chance to look at it. From: Vladimir Petrov Date: Monday, 31 January 2022, 18:34 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org , dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.4.0 +1 I

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17

2022-01-31 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Sounds good. Thaks, Nicolas. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 19:42 Rohit Yadav wrote: > Sounds good to me, thanks for volunteering Nicolas. > > > Regards. > > > From: Boris Stoyanov > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 13:58 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; > us...@cloudstac

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] shwstppr opened a new pull request #262: ipv6: support for isolated nw, vpc tiers

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
shwstppr opened a new pull request #262: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/262 Feature PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5786 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] shwstppr commented on pull request #262: ipv6: support for isolated nw, vpc tiers

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
shwstppr commented on pull request #262: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/262#issuecomment-1026490926 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #262: ipv6: support for isolated nw, vpc tiers

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #262: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/262#issuecomment-1026491404 @shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #262: ipv6: support for isolated nw, vpc tiers

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #262: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/262#issuecomment-1026491787 Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/262. (SL-JID 184) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #262: ipv6: support for isolated nw, vpc tiers

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #262: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/262#discussion_r796313733 ## File path: source/plugins/ipv6.rst ## @@ -199,3 +202,83 @@ each of the VMs. Use DUID-LL to set up dhclient. iface eth0 i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.4.0

2022-01-31 Thread Suresh Anaparti
+1 Performed some VM and Network operations on KVM in ACS 4.16.0, works fine. I've noticed same issue as Rohit, first run failed to create firewall rules and the management server log indicates that the router is still starting (so need to wait a while before applying the firewall rules). Reg