harikrishna-patnala commented on issue #21:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/21#issuecomment-981411662
@synergiator on the first try of creating port forwarding rule, I did not
find any issue it got successfully created.
Then I tried few more scena
davidjumani opened a new pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/23
Modded version of https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/21
Allows backward compatibility of Managementserverid of both int64 and string
data types
--
This is an automated message
davidjumani commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/21#issuecomment-981429451
@psycofdj I'm unable to edit this PR, so created another one with these
commits along with the type name change from CSLong to ManagementServerId in
#23
--
This is an
rhtyd commented on pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/23#issuecomment-981430623
@davidjumani how have we tested this? (apart from the unit test)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
davidjumani commented on pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/23#issuecomment-981436559
@rhtyd Yes, ran a couple of tests targetting the ManagementServerId with
both int and string data types in the response JSON
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
psycofdj commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/21#issuecomment-981446386
Alright I shall close this PR then. Thanks @davidjumani
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
psycofdj closed pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/21
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
davidjumani edited a comment on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/21#issuecomment-981429451
@psycofdj I'm unable to edit this PR, so created another one with these
commits along with the type name change from CSLong to UUID in #23
--
This is an automate
harikrishna-patnala commented on issue #20:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/20#issuecomment-98147
@synergiator I'm also not aware of this but on quick search on google, came
to know this error comes from terraform core when it finds that legacy SDK
rhtyd commented on pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/23#issuecomment-981493465
Alright @psycofdj @davidjumani thanks for coming to some solution that
satisfies both your requirements.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
rhtyd merged pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/23
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
rhtyd commented on issue #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/issues/15#issuecomment-981494227
Perhaps this is no longer an issue now, can you check and confirm @nishiokay
@synergiator ? Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
harikrishna-patnala commented on issue #19:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/19#issuecomment-981497293
Thanks @synergiator for the suggestion, I'll keep this ticket open for
tracking so that we can work on it for next release.
Other issue I could s
All,
During CCC21 hackathon, I explored the feasibility of a 2FA framework and a
TOTP (time-based OTP) plugin that can be used with Google Authenticator, MS
Authenticator, Authy etc.
I've used ideas of TOTP based 2FA PoC to put together a design doc for
discussion:
https://cwiki.apache.org/con
davidjumani opened a new pull request #24:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/24
Added as part of
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/13
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
davidjumani commented on issue #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/issues/15#issuecomment-981553649
This appears to be an issue with parsing the listTemplate API response,
@nishiokay could you provide the response to the listTemplate response with the
templateid 450ec62f-16b1
davidjumani edited a comment on issue #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/issues/15#issuecomment-981553649
This appears to be an issue with parsing the listTemplate API response,
@nishiokay could you :
- List the template (which has child templates) via the sdk
- Provide
harikrishna-patnala commented on issue #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/18#issuecomment-981568225
@synergiator I checked the other ticket on cloudstack-go and you are saying
it is not reproducible now. Is it still a problem deploying a VM using
terr
synergiator commented on issue #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/18#issuecomment-981628455
This data is from API 4.11 (a patched fork of it though); with the terraform
provider I can reproduce this. Will run another unit test for cloudstack-go to
con
Hi All,
In 4.16 we introduced an enhancement that provided support for auto upgrades,
where in one wouldn't have to register the systemVM template prior upgrading
their environments. This however led to an increased size of the
cloudstack-management package as the systemVM templates for all the
20 matches
Mail list logo
