Re: Question about SolidFire plugin with KVM hypervisor

HI Slavka, Based on the code, it would be 'QCOW2' format for KVM, did you notice any discrepancies there. Regards, Suresh On 15/07/21, 10:14 PM, "Slavka Peleva" wrote: Hi all, Is there someone of you who uses the CS 4.15.1.0 or latest with SolidFire primary storage over a KVM hy

Re: Question about SolidFire plugin with KVM hypervisor

Hi Slavka, We use it. Talk about slack. Cheers Sven __ Sven Vogel Senior Manager Research and Development - Cloud and Infrastructure EWERK DIGITAL GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 99 F +49 341 42649 - 98 s.vo...@ewerk.com www.ewerk.com Geschäftsführer: Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik

Re: Question about SolidFire plugin with KVM hypervisor

Hi, Suresh, Sven, Yes, based on code and I think that it's QCOW2, but wanted to be sure :) There is a problem with shrinking the volumes for the block storage plugins (like StorPool) which are keeping the volumes' format as QCOW2 but the actual format is RAW. That's why I'm trying to find out if t

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] sureshanaparti commented on pull request #217: Added vmware disk provisioning types

sureshanaparti commented on pull request #217: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/217#issuecomment-881289289 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL a

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #217: Added vmware disk provisioning types

blueorangutan commented on pull request #217: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/217#issuecomment-881289712 @sureshanaparti a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Ap

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #217: Added vmware disk provisioning types

blueorangutan commented on pull request #217: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/217#issuecomment-881290347 Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/217. (SL-JID 113) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

Meet the CloudStack Community - Rohit Yadav

Hi all, Hope you are having a nice and sunny Friday! I am happy to share that we have a new video from the Meet the CloudStack Community Series! Meet Rohit Yadav, a PMC member of the project. Watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNYls4_zFks Share the video on Twitter: https://t

Re: Question about SolidFire plugin with KVM hypervisor

May be, you can set the volume format to 'RAW' (which is the actual format) when using StorPool plugin, and retry the operation. Regards, Suresh On 16/07/21, 2:10 PM, "Slavka Peleva" wrote: Hi, Suresh, Sven, Yes, based on code and I think that it's QCOW2, but wanted to be sure :)

Re: Question about SolidFire plugin with KVM hypervisor

Yes, I know Suresh :) but our plugin isn't in CS; there is one check in CS if the volumes are in RAW format to set as Hypervisor OVM, which limits the whole functionality. (this a workaround) if (format == ImageFormat.RAW) { // Currently, KVM only suppoorts RBD images of type RAW.

CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Hello everyone, I am happy to announce that our community will organise the CloudStack Collaboration Conference as a Virtual Event. The event will happen from 9th of November to 12th of November 2021. We will work to update the website and do an online registration, which will be announced in th

RE: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Hi Ivet - this is great - thank you for getting this going. As much as I'd prefer to actually *see* everybody, an online conference is a very good second best Great to see the CFP open already. However, I notice that there's no deadline on the CFP - from experience we need a deadline to focus p

RE: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Hi Ivet - this is great - thank you for getting this going. As much as I'd prefer to actually *see* everybody, an online conference is a very good second best Great to see the CFP open already. However, I notice that there's no deadline on the CFP - from experience we need a deadline to focus

Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Hi there, How about sponsoring this Event? Ch Sven __ Sven Vogel Senior Manager Research and Development - Cloud and Infrastructure EWERK DIGITAL GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 99 F +49 341 42649 - 98 s.vo...@ewerk.com www.ewerk.com Geschäftsführer: Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Op 15-07-2021 om 20:49 schreef Kristaps Cudars: Hi Wido, DHCPv6 is not an option? It is poorly implemented in many Operating Systems. Address obtaining does not work. I have seen it fail too many times. It enables feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 in context of VR. IPv6 != IPv4. I

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Op 16-07-2021 om 05:54 schreef Hean Seng: Hi Wido, My initial thought is not like this, it is the /48 at ISP router, and /64 subnet assign to AdvanceZoneVR, AdvanceZoneVR responsible is distribule IPv6 ip (from the assigned /64 sunet) to VM, and not routing the traffic, in the VM that g

Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Giles, if you wouldn't mind, I think it would be generally appreciated if you organized a small committee of people to review the talks as you have in the past. Thanks for all the hard work everyone. Cheers, *Will Stevens* Chief Technology Officer c 514.826.0190 On Fri

Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2021 (9-12 November) - Call For Speakers

Hi Giles, Good reminder for he deadline. I will September 20th. I agree that PMCs have the best experience to make a great selection of talks. Support the idea. Please, organise it and let me know if you need anything else to be done. Kind regards, On 16 Jul 2021, at 13:57, Giles Sirett

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Hi Wido, In current setup, each Cloudstack have own VR, so in this new IPv6 subnet allocation , each VR (which have Frr) will need to have peering with ISP router (and either BGP or Static Route) , and there is 1000 Acocunts, it will 1000 BGP session with ISP router , Am I right for this ? or

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Op 16-07-2021 om 16:42 schreef Hean Seng: Hi Wido, In current setup, each Cloudstack have own VR, so in this new IPv6 subnet allocation , each VR (which have Frr) will need to have peering with ISP router (and either BGP or Static Route) , and there is 1000 Acocunts, it will 1000 BGP sessi

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Hi Wido, Your proposal is to sacrifice ability to reassign IPv6 to instance, have internal domain prefix, and list/db in ACS what IPv6 has been assigned to what instance and go with RA and SLAAC. For route signaling to switch use BGP/OSPFv3 or manual pre-creation. Option with RA and managed fl