Happy New Year to all.
Sorry, I can't add RBD primary storage when I deploy with 4.15 RC3
CloudStack: 4.15 RC3
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.01
DB: MYSQL 8.0.22
CEPH: 15.2.8
libvirt:6.0.0
hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1
Add main memory to report the following error:
2021-01-03 13:15:32,605 DEBUG [cloud.agent.
davidjumani commented on issue #909:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/909#issuecomment-753749118
@hstan77 Do you mean this ?
I did a fresh install test of RC3 for a VMware env:
- ACS management server on CentOS 7
- 2x ESXi 6.5 hosts
- Advanced networking zone
Performed the following tests:
- CRUD operations on templates and ISOs
- VM & volume lifecycle tests
- Live VM migration & s
*Hello,*
I am install CT using basic zone, so all is ok and ping instance from my
local network.
So I decide setup Advanced zone, Can I setup Advanced zone without WAN
interface as like instance ping from my local network. Is it possible or
not. (with vLAN or without vLAN)
Sytemvm got ip f
Jerry,
- Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
- Did you fresh install or upgrade?
@list is there any RDB user that can advise on the missing configuration
causing the NumberFormatException, please?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 1:25 PM li jerry wrote:
> Happy New Year to all.
>
>
> Sor
- Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
- Did you fresh install or upgrade?
No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades
I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running
/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStorag
looks good Jerry,
Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and
should go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry wrote:
> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
> - Did you fresh install or u
Hi Jerry,
I've tested 4.15RC3 by creating and adding a new ceph storage pool (ceph
version 15.2.7 (88e41c6c49beb18add4fdb6b4326ca466d931db8) octopus (stable))
using both legacy and new UI and it seems to work okay, the only problem could
be if you accidentally give a wrong secret in which case
I'm creating PR to fix this.
I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be
unable to be added.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Daan Hoogland
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
收件人: users
抄送: dev
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
looks good Jerry,
Are you making a P
rhtyd commented on issue #909:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/909#issuecomment-753807269
Thanks for explaining @hstan77 this looks like security groups only feature
that isn't supported in new UI, you can use legacy UI or API for the use-case
until we address thi
rhtyd edited a comment on issue #909:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/909#issuecomment-753807269
Thanks for explaining @hstan77 this looks like security groups only feature
that isn't supported in new UI, you can use legacy UI or API for the use-case
until we addr
sureshanaparti commented on issue #904:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/904#issuecomment-753808163
Verified.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12028987/103511279-bd1b4100-4e8c-11eb-9070-e0576b079012.png";>
---
sureshanaparti closed issue #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/904
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
Hi Jerry,
Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the
port, should we still consider it a blocker then?
Regards.
From: li jerry
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: 回复: [VOTE] A
Thanks for the PR Jerry,
Can you try Rohit's way. He seems to provide a way, making this not a
blocker.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:22 AM li jerry wrote:
> I'm creating PR to fix this.
>
> I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to
> be unable to be added.
>
> -邮件
rhtyd edited a comment on issue #909:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/909#issuecomment-753807269
Thanks for explaining @hstan77 this looks like security groups only feature
that isn't supported in new UI, you can use legacy UI or API for the use-case
until we addr
Hi Rohit
Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;
After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created
successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be
displayed.
So I'm sure it's not the wrong key.
Please note that:
In the ou
20 matches
Mail list logo
