Hi Yiping,
“In the course of last three years, we found many features are NOT implemented
for this deployment mode, or API's not working properly. So be warned!”
>> Since you have some time served on this setup it would be great if you can
>> share those issues, and ideally log Github issues f
Thanks for the details Nicolas. I do think the picture is clear(er?) now.
At least, now I understand what you are doing.
BTW: It is a very interesting feature ;)
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying Nicolas. I just wanted to make sure that there
> wasn't
+1 for this feature Nicolas. As Will had mentioned, snapshots are not
backups. snapshots just ensure crash consistency but don’t necessarily
guarantee data consistency. My question is that whether there is going to
be a 3rd party backup solution integration that will serve as a reference?
Thanks,
Hi All,
I've created a 4.11.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artefacts up for
testing and a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.1.0-RC20180611T1504
Commit: bcf602c7cd4ab662a7c4f208dee32fb8513e26c8
Source
Thanks guys.
Yes, we are planning the integration with Veeam as a plugin within this
framework.
Kind regards,
Nicolas
De: Syed Ahmed
Enviado: lunes, 11 de junio 11:19
Asunto: Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework
Para: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
+1 for this feature Nicolas. As Will had m
It's been a long time, honestly, I have to take a long trip down my memory to
remember the circumstance where we had problems.
On 6/11/18, 2:01 AM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
Hi Yiping,
“In the course of last three years, we found many features are NOT
implemented for this deployment
Hello Devs,
When we deployed cloudstack 4.11.0 into production, we found that the UFW rules
for the KVM host overrides the firewall rules set by the user in cloudstack.
This prevented network access to the VMs on most ports.
We followed the guide on this page for the advanced zone – ubuntu.
htt
