As we are already using a list management server API calls to handle the
scripting of the shutdown/upgrade/start, I manually backported the code:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2578
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ron, that i
Can we list the options and their voting numbers? I am a bit confused
right now.
I like the one that is left aligned under the text and keeps the logo on
the right full size.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 10:41 PM Nitin Maharana,
wrote:
> +1 for the third option. I think It would even look good if we
I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The
tally so far is the following:
- Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1
vote (Rafael)
- Option 2 (a new section called “Apache events”)- 1 vote (Gabriel)
- Option 3 (Banner aligned
I like option 3 the best.
On 4/17/18, 12:43 PM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
A biased +1 for option 3 from me.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 17/04/2018, 19:42, "Rafael Weingärtner"
wrote:
Third option (suggested by Dag) -
htt
My vote is for 3.
On 4/18/18, 5:13 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:
I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The
tally so far is the following:
- Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1
vote (Rafael)
- Opt
I vote 4
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 7:13 AM Rafael Weingärtner, <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The
> tally so far is the following:
>
>- Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1
>vote (Ra
Hello Folks,
Today I was going to upload new keys to transifex and translate some
strings proposed in [1]. It looks a little messy the Transifex resources.
As I user, when I get there, I have no idea where I should work. Can we
have/use a single resource file there? If we only use the
“4.10_message
Can somebody add me to the Spanish team? I am not able to add myself.
Or, can someone port the keys updated here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2571/files?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Folks,
> Today I was going to u
I wish that there was this much excitement about the problems in the
installation docs!
Lets make a decision and live with layout for a few weeks and see how
placement number 3 affects the community and how many people who did not
plan to go to ApacheCon decide to go because of the placement o
Done. Site updated.
If we feel that it requires changes, we can do so later.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I wish that there was this much excitement about the problems in the
> installation docs!
>
> Lets make a decision and live with layout for a few weeks and see how
All,
I could not find any history around 'why' we MARK or CONNMARK packets in mangle
table in VRs? I found an issue in case of VPCs where `MARK` iptable rules
failed hair-pin nat (as described in this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514)
The valid usage I found was wrt VPN_STA
Hi,
Below are the uses of marking packets.
1. Marking is required to route the packets into correct interface in case
additional public interfaces in VR.
2. Packets with VPN marking are accepted in first place of NAT POSTROUTING.
Without marking these packets source ip will be replaced with sou
Hi Jayapal,
Thanks for replying. Can you point me to the code/rules that use the marking
for packet routing (in case of additional public nics) in latest 4.11 or master
branch? Don't we have routing tables and nat rules for routing across
interfaces?
This started from reviewing Rafael's PR,
Nevermind, found the use of custom routing tables. In case someone want to
refer, hints are here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514#issuecomment-382510915
Jayapal and others - I've another one, is there a way to do routing without
marking packets at all, even in case of VRs with a
Rohit,
My comments inline.
On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:52 AM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Nevermind, found the use of custom routing tables. In case someone want to
refer, hints are here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514#issuecomment-382510915
Jayapal and o
15 matches
Mail list logo
