Reading all the reactions I am getting wary of all the possible solutions
that we have.
We do have a fragile VR and Remi's way seems the only one to stabilise it.
It also answers the question on which of my two tactics we should follow.
Wido's abjection may be valid but services that are not star
It seems sensible to me to have ONE VR, and I like the idea of that we all VRs
are 'redundant-ready', again supporting the ONE-VR approach.
The question I have is:
- how do we handle the transition - does it need ACS 5.0?
The API and the UI separate the VR and the VPC, so what is the most logica
ONE-VR approach in ACS 5.0. It is time to plan for a major release and
break some things...
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:17 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
> It seems sensible to me to have ONE VR, and I like the idea of that we all
> VRs are 'redundant-ready', again supporting the ONE-VR approach.
>
> The q
On 02/06/2018 02:47 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of different
> code paths: VPC versus non-VPC, VPC versus redundant-VPC, etc. That's why you
> cannot simply switch from a single VPC to a redundant VPC for example.
>
>
Kris
My bad - I was working from a summary list
Kind regards
Giles
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Kris Sterckx [mailto:kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net]
Sent: 06 February 2018 12:
+1 too
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rene Moser"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 February, 2018 10:11:45
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
> On 02/06/2018 02:47 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>> Hi D
I have pushed a fix for this on PR 2448. Can you please test it?
From: Nux!
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 10:25:07 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Refusing to design this network, the physical isolation type is
not BCF_SEGMENT
Thanks Nicolas, much appreciated.
Once yo
Hi all,
A feature has been introduced on 4.11.0 allowing to register templates
bypassing secondary storage using a new option 'Direct Download'. It allows
templates to be directly downloaded into primary storage at VM deployment time.
It is an experimental feature and it is currently supported
That's a great feature I think, thanks Nicolas for pushing it!
Marc-Aurèle
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> A feature has been introduced on 4.11.0 allowing to register templates
> bypassing secondary storage using a new opti
