kristian,
these sound like serious regressions. Do you have a fix or did you analyse
the code yet?
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created issue in jira 2 month ago.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141
>
> In version 4.10 VR pass
Hi All,
I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603
Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4
Source release (checks
Yes, I know. I made that that's why i asked. This fix isn't in 4.10 but is
in 4.11.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
>
> We made lot testing but did´nt had time to dig code this time.
> There was similar VR password management related and fixed issue
> https://issues.apac
Kristian,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
>>
> ...
As for this one:
> Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged
>> > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR
>> > New instance will get then old ro
I suggest you discuss it on the vote thread for RC1 Kristian.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
>
> This fix is only for smaller part of password management..
> Is´t possible that someone have look VR password distribution with
> instance creation ?
--
Daan
All,
I've updated master to 4.12.0.0-SNAPSHOT, it may accept feature PRs now. They
should use the 4.12 milestone: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/4
If you've sent a bugfix (and acceptable enhancement [1]) PR, kindly change the
base branch to 4.11 and milestone to 4.11.1:
https
Hi!
Ok, as my PR for the maven standard structure does a lot of file moves, I'm
putting it as a first PR to accept if people agree to:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2283
I still have to rebase and fix the conflict, which will be done shortly.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yad
I think a PR with a single commit and a large number of files will be ok, if we
make sure each usage of CS StringUtils functions is replaced by the Apache ones
and their code removed from CS StringUtils. I also think that another PR could
be created to move those functions mentioned by Rafael wh
Sure.
It doesn't seem to be a systematic failure.
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 15 January 2018
Hi,
I'm just trying out 4.11 RC1 with a new network config.
I have created a bridge and used it for 2 separate guest networks (ie traffic
labels).
See http://img.nux.ro/M7V-Selection_313.png
Everything went ok, except when trying to create the very first network I am
getting this error:
"Tags a
Hello,
Just installed 4.11 RC1 and following some tests with a single HV I tried
adding another, but only to get the error in the subject.
http://img.nux.ro/R7x-Selection_314.png
More logs here http://tmp.nux.ro/s3J-guid-cluster-err.txt
The management server does not even attempt to contact tha
What hypervisor is and version is that Lucian?
I'm seeing some weird (similar) stuff with ubuntu 16.04, but it doesn't seem to
like 4.10 either, so I thought it was something I was doing wrong.
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garde
Hi,
CentOS 7 hypervisors, all of them , configured similarly.
The thing is, the management server does not even attempt to connect to it,
tcpdump outputs nada.
It just spits out that error.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> Fr
Ok, I solved it.
The install was a bit bumpy because of the problem in my other email re
VLAN/VXLAN, so maybe that's what caused it.
I checked cloud.cluster table and my cluster was missing the "guid", it was
NULL.
I've generated a uuid and updated the table and I was able to add the rest of
th
Hi,
I see there's a new HA engine for KVM and IPMI support which is really nice,
however it seems hit and miss.
I have created an instance with HA offering, kernel panicked one of the
hypervisors - after a while the server was rebooted via IPMI probably, but the
instance never moved to a runnin
Daan,
Now that master is open for merges again, can we get a feedback here? It
might be interesting to find a consensus and a standardize way of working
for everybody before we start merging things in master again …
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:40 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.co
If the new approach is adopted, we will likely have to change the
functionality of the 'tools' here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/git
Especially 'git-pr' creates merges with the "would be deprecated" style, so
we will probably want to adapt our tracked tooling to conform
Hey guys,
I'm no Ubuntu Guru, so I want to check that I have this right
Our documentation says:
--
On Ubuntu: modify /etc/default/libvirt-bin
Add "-l" to the following line
libvirtd_opts="-d"
so it looks like:
libvirtd_opts="-d -l"
---
I've fou
On 01/15/2018 09:06 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote:
> Daan,
>
> Now that master is open for merges again, can we get a feedback here? It
> might be interesting to find a consensus and a standardize way of working
> for everybody before we start merging things in master again …
+1 to allow merge c
Hi,
I noticed a problem related to hostnames/IP addressing on KVM with RC1 for 4.11.
I have a single Basic Zone with KVM (no other hypervisor type in use). My two
KVM hosts are running on Ubuntu 14.04.
All system VMs come up and I create a new VM whose root disk resides on NFS
(alongside the r
Hi Tim,
As long as it work, since it's only used to for the initial instruction set
at the VR boot so eth0 can be configure, I think xenstore would work just
fine.
unless you are saying we could just not rely on xenstore in terms of
reliability?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | C
Hi Paul;
Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd installed and it directly controls libvirtd
process so if you add -d to /etc/default/libvirt-bin file libvirtd tries to
control to its self and then you have problem, you could not
stop/start/restart libvirtd service via systemd. Only adding -l flag to
libvirtd_opt
On 01/16/2018 06:36 AM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote:
Hi Paul;
Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd installed and it directly controls libvirtd
process so if you add -d to /etc/default/libvirt-bin file libvirtd tries to
control to its self and then you have problem, you could not
stop/start/restart libvirtd
23 matches
Mail list logo
